References
- Eckerlund I, Gerdtham UG. Estimating the effect of cesarean section rate on health outcome. Evidence from Swedish hospital data. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 1999; 15(1): 123–35.
- Kilsztajn S, Carmo MS, Machado LC Jr, Lopes ES, Lima LZ. Caesarean sections and maternal mortality in Sao Paulo. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132(1): 64–9.
- Matshidze KP, Richter LM, Ellison GT, Levin JB, McIntyre JA. Caesarean section rates in South Africa: evidence of bias among different “population groups”. Ethn Health 1998; 3(1–2): 71–9.
- Tshibangu KC, De Jongh MA, De Villiers DJ, Du Toit JJ, Shah SMH. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector—3 year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital. S Afr Med J 2002; 92(12): 956–9.
- Snyman, L. Is the high caesarean section rate a cause for concern? Obstet Gynaecol Forum 2002; 12(2): 8–13.
- Lewis G. The sixth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Why mothers die. 2000–2002.
- London: RCOG Press; 2004. p. 38.
- Price MR, Broomberg J. The impact of the fee-for-service reimbursement system on the utilisation of health services. Part III. A comparison of caesarean section rates in white nulliparous women in the private and public sectors. S Afr Med J 2004; 78(3): 136–8.
- Read JS, Newell ML. Efficacy and safety of caesarean delivery for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005479. D0I: 10.1002/14651858.CD005479.
- O'Leary CM, De Klerk N, Keogh J, et al. Trends in mode of delivery during 1984–2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? Br J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 114(7): 855–64.
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
- Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginal birth after caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19(1): 117–30.
- Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77(3): 465–70.
- McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(10): 689–95.
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Clinical Guideline 13. Caesarean Section. London: NICE; 2004.
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, William AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356(9239): 1375–83.
- Bateman C. Rendering unto Caesar? S Afr Med J 2004; 94(10): 800–2.
- Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizan JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium- and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth 2006; 33(4): 270–7.
- Villar J, Carroli G, Zavalea N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. Br Med J 2007; 335(7628): 1025.
- Moodliar S, Moodley J. Complications following caesarean delivery at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa. Obstet Gynaecol Forum 2004; 14(3): 21–6.