References
- Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issue. 1946; 2: 34–46.
- Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005; p. 281.
- Cohen L, Manion K, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 6th ed. New York: Routhledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2007.
- SAS Institute. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's guide. Cary: SAS Institute; 2004.
- Joubert G, Ehrlich R. Epidemiology: a research manual for South Africa. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
- Boddy C. A rose by any other name may small as sweet but “group discussion” is not another name for a “focus group” nor should it be. Qualitative Market Research. 2005; 8 (3): 248–255.
- University of the Free State. Assessment policy. UFS [homepage on the Internet]. 2006. c2011. Available from: http://www.ufs.ac.za/documents/ufsfacts/policies/assessmentpolicy
- University of the Free State. General institutional rules and regulations for advanced and postgraduate qualifications. UFS [homepage on the Internet]. 2011. Available from: http:www.ufs.ac.za/dl/userfiles/Documents/00000/48_eng.pdf
- University of the Free State. 2011. Faculty of Health Science: postgraduate degrees and diplomas yearbook. UFS [homepage on the Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://apps.ufs.ac.za/dl/yearbooks/151_yearbook_eng.pdf
- Colleges of Medicine of South Africa. Fellow of the College of Family Physicians regulations. CMSA [homepage on the Internet]. c2011. Available from: http://www.collegemedsa.ac.za/view_exam.aspx?examid=102
- Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15 (9): 1277–1288.
- Pathirage C, Haigh R, Amaratunga D, Baldry D. Enhancing the quality and consistency of undergraduate dissertation assessment. Quality Assurance in Education. 2007; 15 (3): 271–286.
- Bettany-Saltikov J, Kilinc S, Stow K. Bones, boys, bombs and booze: an exploratory study of the reliability of marking dissertations across disciplines. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2009; 34(6): 621–639.
- Matthews L. Dissertations: issues in guidance, supervision and assessment. Newcastle: British Library, Northumbria University, 2007; p. 1–29.
- Levy Y Ellis TJ. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Information Science Journal. 2006; 9: 181–211.
- Webster F, Pepper D, Jenkins A. 2000. Assessing the undergraduate dissertation. 2000. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2000; 25(1): 71–80.
- Hand L, Clewes D. Marking the difference: an investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2000; 25(1):5–21.