Study of surgical feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic surgery in malignant rectal tumors

References

• Kong M, Chen H, Shan K, et al. Comparison of survival among adults with rectal cancer who have undergone laparoscopic vs open surgery: a meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210861. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela C, Kim NK. Surgical treatment of low-lying rectal cancer: Updates. Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):395–424. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00927.0132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xynos E, Tekkis P, Gouvas N, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO). Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29(2):103–126. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delibegovic S. Introduction to total mesorectal excision. Med Arch. 2017;71(6):434–438. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.434-438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):982–989. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–218. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34(6):498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, et al. Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(5):675–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Cologne KG. Laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer-the new standard? Front Oncol. 2020;10:1239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexner SD. Further validation of the wexner incontinence score: a note of appreciation and gratitude. Surgery. 2021;170(1):53–54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney DE, Coffey JC. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW, Kang SB, Hao J, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(7):569–577. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00094-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Cao G, Chen B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years. Int J Surg. 2017;39:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH, de Campos FG, et al. Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003;58(3):133–140. doi: 10.1590/S0041-87812003000300002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(8):1211–1215. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9170-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–1355. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milone M, Manigrasso M, Burati M, et al. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, et al. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1485–1502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang FW, Zhou ZY, Wang HL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(22):9985–9996. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.22.9985
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the alacart randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–1363. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, et al. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People’s Republic of China. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(5):950–957. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f13a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wang W, et al. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 2013;183(2):524–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2009;33(8):1750–1756. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0079-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(8):963–968. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d3677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Woods WG, et al. A meta analysis comparing side to end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14(2):113–123. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0576-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si C, Zhang Y, Sun P. Colonic J-pouch versus Baker type for rectal reconstruction after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(12):1428–1435. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.845905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, et al. Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(5):391–395. doi: 10.1007/s00423-004-0499-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):603–612. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne CM, Solomon MJ, Young JM, et al. Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: short-term outcomes of 513 consecutive patients and predictors of successful treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):417–427. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0846-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar