Publication Cover
Arab Journal of Urology
An International Journal
Volume 18, 2020 - Issue 2
1,040
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Stones/Endourology

Inter-observer variability amongst surgeons and radiologists in assessment of Guy’s Stone Score and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score: A prospective evaluation

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 118-123 | Received 04 Aug 2019, Accepted 31 Oct 2019, Published online: 18 Dec 2019

References

  • Mishra S , Sharma R , Garg C , et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108:896–899.
  • Thomas K , Smith NC , Hegarty N , et al. The Guy’s Stone Score - grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78:277–281.
  • Okhunov Z , Friedlander JI , George AK , et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology. 2013;81:1154–1159.
  • Smith A , Averch TD , Shahrour K , et al. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2013;190:149–156.
  • Jeong CW , Jung JW , Cha WH , et al. Seoul national university renal stone complexity score for predicting stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65888.
  • Mandal S , Goel A , Kathpalia R , et al. Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy’s Stone Score: a single-center experience. Indian J Urol. 2012;28:392–398.
  • Sinha RK , Mukherjee S , Jindal T , et al. Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy’s Stone Score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:349–353.
  • Vicentini FC , Marchini GS , Mazzucchi E , et al. Utility of the Guy’s Stone Score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology. 2014;83:1248–1253.
  • Sfoungaristos S , Lorber A , Gofrit ON , et al. External validation and predictive accuracy assessment of Guy’s Stone Score as a preoperative tool for estimating percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. J Endourol. 2015;29:1131–1135.
  • Ingimarsson JP , Dagrosa LM , Hyams ES , et al. External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy’s Stone Score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria. Urology. 2014;83:45–49.
  • Noureldin YA , Elkoushy MA , Andonian S. External validation of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:190–195.
  • Akhavein A , Henriksen C , Syed J , et al. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome. Urology. 2015;85:69–73.
  • Choo MS , Jeong CW , Jung JH , et al. External validation and evaluation of reliability and validity of the S-ReSC scoring system to predict stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e83628.
  • Noureldin YA , Elkoushy MA , Andonian S. Which is better? Guy’s versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2015;33:1821–1825.
  • Ş K , Aydemir H , Halis F , et al. Value of preoperative stone scoring systems in predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68:353–357.
  • Bozkurt IH , Aydogdu O , Yonguc T , et al. Comparison of guy and clinical research office of the endourological society nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 437 cases. J Endourol. 2015;29:1006–1010.
  • Labadie K , Okhunov Z , Akhavein A , et al. Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery. J Urol. 2015;193:154–159.
  • Tailly TO , Okhunov Z , Nadeau BR , et al. Multicenter external validation and comparison of stone scoring systems in predicting outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2016;30:594–601.
  • Okhunov Z , Helmy M , Perez-lansac A , et al. Interobserver reliability and reproducibility of s.T.o.N.e. Nephrolithometry for renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27:1303–1306.
  • Billis A , Guimaraes MS , Freitas LL , et al. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. J Urol. 2008;180:548–552.
  • Keays MA , Guerra LA , Mihill J , et al. Reliability assessment of society for fetal urology ultrasound grading system for hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2008;180(Suppl):1680–1682.
  • Bujang MA , Baharum N . A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci. 2017;12:1–11.
  • DeLong ER , DeLong DM , Clarke-Pearson DL . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845.
  • McHugh ML . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.
  • Wu WJ , Okeke Z . Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:459–469.
  • Singla A , Khattar N , Nayyar R , et al. How practical is the application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy scoring systems? Prospective study comparing Guy’s Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. score and the clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) nomogram. Arab J Urol. 2017;15:7–16.