Publication Cover
Arab Journal of Urology
An International Journal
Volume 18, 2020 - Issue 2
1,326
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Voiding Dysfunction/Female Urology

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence

, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 78-87 | Received 02 Sep 2019, Accepted 21 Dec 2019, Published online: 04 Feb 2020

References

  • Hunskaar S , Lose G , Sykes D , et al. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int. 2004;93:324–330.
  • Onder G , Carpenter I , Finne-Soveri H , et al. Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:5.
  • Brocklehurst JC. Urinary incontinence in the community: analysis of a MORI poll. Br Med J. 1993;306:832–834.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration . FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. [updated 2008 Oct 20 ; cited 2019 Dec] . Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/102008-surgicalmesh.html
  • Foley E. An artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1947;58:250–259.
  • Foley E . An artificial sphincter and method. US Patent: 2455859. 1948.
  • Scott FB , Bradley WE , Timm GW . Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1974;112:75–80.
  • Marshall VF . Stress incontinence in the female. In: Marshall FF , editor. Operative urology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co.; 1991. p. 169–172.
  • Dmochowski RR , Blaivas J , Gormley EA , et al. Update of AUA guideline for the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183:1906–1914.
  • Jacquetin B . Can a very simple test justify using a new intervention in stress urinary incontinence? The ulmsten prosthetic suburethral support. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1998;27:215–216.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Urinary incontinence in women: management. Clinical Guidlinie [CG171) Published date September 2013. [update 2015 Nov ; cited 2019 Dec] . Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg171
  • Chung E . A state of art review on the evolution of the urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: past, present and future innovations. J Med Eng Technol. 2014;38:328–332.
  • Kim SP , Sarmast Z , Daignault S , et al. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol. 2008;179:1912–1916.
  • Phé V , Benadiba S , Rouprêt M , et al. Long term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014;113:961–967.
  • Moher D , Liberati A , Tetzlaff J , et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
  • Abrams P , Andersson KE , Birder L , et al. Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:213–240.
  • Tricard T , Jochum F , Bergerat S , et al. Outcomes of open artificial urinary sphincter in women with stress urinary incontinence: long-term follow up. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1756287219874676.
  • Gondran-Tellier B , Boissier R , Baboudjian M , et al. Robot-assisted implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter, the AMS-800, via a posterior approach to the bladder neck in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. BJU Int. 2019;124:1077–1080.
  • Peyronnet B , Capon G , Belas O , et al. Robot-assisted AMS-800 artificial urinary sphincter bladder neck implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2019;75:169–175.
  • Ferreira C , Brychaert PE , Menard J , et al. Laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: mid-term outcomes. Int J Urol. 2017;24:308–313.
  • Biardeau X , Rizk J , Marcelli F , et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience. Eur Urol. 2015;67:937–942.
  • Fournier G , Callerot P , Thoulouzan M , et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: initial results. Urology. 2014;84:1094–1098.
  • Costa P , Poinas G , Ben Naoum K , et al. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:753–758.
  • Trolliet S , Mandron E , Lang H , et al. Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with severe urinary stress incontinence. Prog Urol. 2013;23:877–883.
  • Vayleux B , Rigaud J , Luyckx F , et al. Female urinary incontinence and artificial urinary sphincter: study of efficacy and risk factors for failure and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;59:1048–1053.
  • Chung E , Cartmill RA . 25-year experience in the outcome of artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106:1664–1667.
  • Mandron E , Bryckaert PE , Papatsoris AG . Laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter implantation for female genuine stress urinary incontinence: technique and 4-year experience in 25 patients. BJU Int. 2010;106:1194–1198.
  • Rouprêt M , Misraï V , Vaessen C , et al. Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: a single-centre preliminary experience. Eur Urol. 2009;57:499–504.
  • Ngninkeu BN , van Heugen G , Di Gregorio M , et al. Laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter in women for type III incontinence: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 2005;47:793–797.
  • Thomas K , Venn SN , Mundy AR . Outcome of the artificial urinary sphincter in female patients. J Urol. 2002;167:1720–1722.
  • Wells GA , Shea B , O’Connell D , et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000. [cited 2019 Dec] . Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
  • Chartier-Kastler E , Van Kerrebroeck P , Olianas R , et al. Artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a technique for insiders? BJU Int. 2011;107:1618–1626.
  • Roupret M , Chartier-Kastler E , Richard F . Artificial urinary sphincters in women: indications, techniques, results. Prog Urol. 2005;15:489–493. [Article in French].
  • Lee R , Te AE , Kaplan SA , et al. Temporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2009;181:2622–2627.
  • Light JK , Scott FB . Management of urinary incontinence in women with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1985;134:476–478.