Publication Cover
Arab Journal of Urology
An International Journal
Volume 18, 2020 - Issue 3
1,612
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology/ Reconstruction

An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following radical prostatectomy: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 136-141 | Received 28 Jan 2020, Accepted 15 Mar 2020, Published online: 17 Apr 2020

References

  • Azubuike SO, Muirhead C, Hayes L, et al. Rising global burden of breast cancer: the case of sub-Saharan Africa (with emphasis on Nigeria) and implications for regional development: a review. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:63.
  • Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: analysis of the European cancer observatory. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1164–1187.
  • Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–137.
  • Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302:1557–1564.
  • Pompe RS, Beyer B, Haese A, et al. Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems. BJU Int. 2018;122:801–807.
  • Hiess M, Ponholzer A, Lamche M, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of complications used for radical prostatectomy [Article in German]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2014;164:297–301.
  • Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K, et al. Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:536–542.
  • Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1368–1375.
  • Eddy DM. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA. 1990;263:441–443.
  • Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71:618–629.
  • Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54:785–793.
  • Robles L, Slogoff M, Ladwig-Scott E, et al. The addition of a nurse practitioner to an inpatient surgical team results in improved use of resources. Surgery. 2011;150:711–717.
  • Merhe A, Hout M, Haidar NA, et al. Is age an independent risk factor for perioperative mortality and morbidity after radical prostatectomy? Analysis of the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database. Arab J Urol. 2020. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2020.1721165.
  • Sood A, Kachroo N, Abdollah F, et al. An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following radical cystectomy: data from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. Urology. 2017;103:91–98.
  • Wakeam E, Hyder JA, Tsai TC, et al. Complication timing and association with mortality in the American college of surgeons’ national surgical quality improvement program database. J Surg Res. 2015;193:77–87.
  • Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louie R, et al. Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg. 2013;258:10–18.
  • Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, et al. Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2010;252:183–190.
  • Sood A, Abdollah F, Sammon JD, et al. An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program (ACS-NSQIP). World J Urol. 2015;33:2031–2038.