Comparison of standard- and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones

References

• Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M. Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol. 2012;26:6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, et al. The guy’s stone score – grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78:277–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016;196:1161–1169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganpule AP, Naveen Kumar Reddy M, Sudharsan SB, et al. Multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculus. Asian J Urol. 2020;7:94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM, et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J Urol. 2007;177:576–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18:715–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating staghorn stones: 10 years of experience of a tertiary-care centre. Arab J Urol. 2012;10:324–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S, et al. Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review from the European association of urology urolithiasis guidelines panel. Eur Urol. 2017;72:220–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of microperc, miniperc, and ultraminiperc. World J Urol. 2015;33:235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElSheemy MS, Elmarakbi AA, Hytham M, et al. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukreja RA. Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15-30 mm)? World J Urol. 2018;36:285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24:1075–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, et al. The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Cui Z, Zeng T, et al. Comparison of 1-stage with 2-stage multiple-tracts mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of staghorn stones: a matched cohorts analysis. Urology. 2016;87:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guohua Z, Zhong W, Li X, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a novel single session approach via multiple 14-18Fr tracts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:124–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu W, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts in a single session in treating staghorn calculi. Urol Res. 2011;39:117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases. J Endourol. 2013;27:1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R, Li S, Zhao H, et al. [Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn calculi in patients by mini-tract and standard-tract] [Article in Chinese]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37:840–843.
   Google Scholar
• Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008;53:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman Y, Harraz AM, El-Nahas AR, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era? Urology. 2013;81:723–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadgi S, El-Nahas AR, Darrad M, et al. Safety and efficacy of a single middle calyx access (MCA) in mini-PCNL. Urolithiasis. 2020;48:541–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G, et al. Miniperc? No, thank you! Eur Urol. 2007;51:810–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelhafez MF, Amend B, Bedke J, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study of the management of small and large renal stones. Urology. 2013;81:241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokov D, Manka L, Beck A, et al. Only size matters in stone patients: computed tomography controlled stone-free rates after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2019;103:166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, He Z, Wu K, et al. Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience. J Endourol. 2009;23:1693–1697.
   Google Scholar
• Guler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, et al. Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:289–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar