Publication Cover
Arab Journal of Urology
An International Journal
Volume 20, 2022 - Issue 2
2,198
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy as first-line definitive therapy for patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 71-80 | Received 16 Aug 2021, Accepted 31 Oct 2021, Published online: 30 Mar 2022

References

  • Lughezzani G, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2010 [accessed 2021 Jan 9];58:687–700. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283810006974.
  • Gallina A, Chun FK, Suardi N, et al. Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;101:1513–1518.
  • Cooperberg MR, Cowan J, Broering JM, et al. High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007. World J Urol. 2008;26:211–218.
  • Shariat SF, Kattan MW, Vickers AJ, et al. Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1555–1584.
  • Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–2012.
  • Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–605.
  • Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
  • Yasui M, Sakaguchi M, Jikuya R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of surgery and radiotherapy for survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a population-based coarsened exact matching retrospective cohort study. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:150.
  • Zhou X, Jin K, Qiu S, et al. Comparing effectiveness of radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(34):e21642.
  • Muralidhar V, Mahal BA, Butler S, et al. Combined external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiation therapy for Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer. J Urol. 2019;202:973–978.
  • Knipper S, Palumbo C, Pecoraro A, et al. Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 9-10 at biopsy: a population-based analysis. Urol Oncol. 2020;38:79.e9–79.e14.
  • Yin M, Zhao J, Monk P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of surgery versus external beam radiation with/without brachytherapy in high-risk localized prostate cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;9:27–34.
  • Berg S, Cole AP, Krimphove MJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75:552–555.
  • Jayadevappa R, Lee DI, Chhatre S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for high-risk prostate cancer patients. J Urol Oncol. 2019;37:574.e11–574.e18.
  • Reichard CA, Hoffman KE, Tang C, et al. Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for high- and very high-risk prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic experience of patients eligible for either treatment. BJU Int. 2019;124:811–819.
  • Ennis RD, Hu L, Ryemon SN, et al. Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with similar survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1192–1198.
  • Tilki D, Chen MH, Wu J, et al. Surgery vs radiotherapy in the management of biopsy Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer and the risk of mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:213–220.
  • Jang TL, Patel N, Faiena I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2018;124:4010–4022.
  • Kishan AU, Cook RR, Ciezki JP, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost and disease progression and mortality in patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer. JAMA. 2018;319:896–905.
  • Robinson D, Garmo H, Lissbrant IF, et al. Prostate cancer death after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based observational study. Eur Urol. 2018;73:502–511.
  • Markovina S, Meeks MW, Badiyan S, et al. Superior metastasis-free survival for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;3:190–196.
  • Gu X, Gao X, Cui M, et al. Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer: a population-based, propensity score matched study. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1061–1067.
  • Feldman AS, Meyer CP, Sanchez A, et al. Morbidity and mortality of locally advanced prostate cancer: a population based analysis comparing radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation. J Urol. 2017;198:1061–1068.
  • Ciezki JP, Weller M, Reddy CA, et al. A comparison between low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation, external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation, and radical prostatectomy with or without adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97:962–975.
  • Yamamoto S, Masuda H, Urakami S, et al. Patient-perceived satisfaction after definitive treatment for men with high-risk prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Urology. 2015;85:407–413.
  • Merino T, San Francisco IF, Rojas PA, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term follow-up. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:530.
  • Hoffman RM, Koyama T, Fan KH, et al. Mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:711–718.
  • Sun M, Sammon JD, Becker A, et al. Radical prostatectomy vs radiotherapy vs observation among older patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparative effectiveness evaluation. BJU Int. 2014;113:200–208.
  • Westover K, Chen M-H, Moul J, et al. Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;110:1116–1121.
  • Kibel AS, Ciezki JP, Klein EA, et al. Survival among men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol. 2012;187:1259–1265.
  • Abdollah F, Schmitges J, Sun M, et al. Comparison of mortality outcomes after radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Int J Urol. 2012;19:836–844.
  • Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Viterbo R, et al. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:2883–2891.
  • Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ. 2014;348:g1502.
  • Taguchi S, Fukuhara H, Shiraishi K, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer: comparison of patient outcomes including mortality. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141123.
  • Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RC, et al. EAU guidelines: prostate cancer; 2020. [cited 2020 Dec 25]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/.
  • Motlagh RS, Abufaraj M, Mori K, et al. The efficacy and safety of relugolix compared with degarelix in advanced prostate cancer patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. Online ahead of print. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.002.
  • Dearnaley DP, Saltzstein DR, Sylvester JE, et al. The oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist relugolix as neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy to external beam radiotherapy in patients with localised intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 2 trial. Eur Urol. 2020;78:184–192.
  • Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012;380:2018–2027.
  • Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2924–2930.
  • Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009;181:956–962.
  • Laukhtina E, Sari Motlagh R, Mori K, et al. Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2021;39(11):4085–4099.
  • Sari MR, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity among prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2021. Online ahead of print. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03810-6.