The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI): recent developments and future prospects

References

• United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction: United Nations; 2018 [14/02/18].
   Google Scholar
• Kiv S, Douthit N, Shack A, et al. Epidemiology and history of natural disasters and mass casualties. In: Wolfson N, Lerner A, Roshal L, editors. Orthopedics in disasters: orthopedic injuries in natural disasters and mass casualty events. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2016. p. 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Redmond A. Individual preparedness in disaster response. In: Wolfson N, Lerner A, Roshal L, editors. Orthopedics in disasters: orthopedic injuries in natural disasters and mass casualty events. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2016. p. 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Hill T. Disaster victim identification: a review. Minerva Medicolegale. 2009;129:35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens PJ. Investigation of mass disaster. In: Mant AK, editor. Modern trends in forensic medicine no. 3. London: Butterworths; 1973. p. 170–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bikker J. Identification of missing persons and unidentified remains in disaster victim identification recommendations and best practice. In: Mallett X, Blythe T, Berry R, editors. Advances in forensic human identification. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francis; 2014. p. 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Hill A, Briggs C, et al. Missing persons – missing data: examining the need for the collection of ante-mortem dental records of missing persons. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:386–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons T, Skinner M, editors. The accuracy of ante-mortem data and presumptive identification: appropriate procedures, application and ethics. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 2005; Seattle: AAFS.
   Google Scholar
• Eitzen D, Zimmermann A. Setting up an off-site emergency mortuary facility (EMF) to deal with a DVI incident: disaster victim management (DVM). Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011;8:189–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byard RW, Cooke C, Leditsche J. Practical issues involved in setting up temporary mortuaries after mass disasters. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2006;2:59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo LS, Lai PS, Saidin MH, et al. Cling film plastic wrap: an innovation for dead body packaging, preservation and transportation by first responders as a replacement for cadaver body bag in large scale disasters. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;285:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cosmo S, Barbera JA. Rapid disaster victim identification in mass fatality incidents: decision support tool to facilitate human remains identification. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6:277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slooten K. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levison J. Israeli response to mass death. Disaster Prev Manage: Int J. 2011;20:485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HH, Maat GJR. The Dutch approach in disaster victim identification. J Med Leg Droit Med. 2016;59:85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Black S, Sunderland G, Hackman L, et al., editors. Disaster victim identification: experience and practice. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Merli C, Buck T. Forensic identification and identity politics in 2004 post-tsunami Thailand: negotiating dissolving boundaries. Hum Remains Violence. 2015;1:3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder A. “Locals within locals”: cultural sensitivity in disaster aid. Anthropol Today. 2008;24:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Sahelangi P, Novita M. Role of dentists in Indonesian disaster victim identification operations: religious & cultural aspects. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30:60–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byard RW, Winskog C. Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification (DVI) exercises. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winskog C, Tonkin A, Byard RW. The educational value of disaster victim identification (DVI) missions—transfer of knowledge. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:84–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuliar Y, Knudsen PJT. Role of forensic pathologists in mass disasters. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:164–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma AK, Kumar S, Rathore S, et al. Role of dental expert in forensic odontology. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014;5:2–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tengrove HG. Forensic odontology in disaster victim identification. In: Taylor JA, Kieser JA, editors. Forensic odontology: principles and practice. London: A. Taylor and Jules A. Kieser; 2016. p. 286–335.
   Google Scholar
• Berketa JW, James H, Lake AW. Forensic odontology involvement in disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelius J, Lindblom B. DNA analysis in disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TJ, Huel R, Davoren J, et al. Application of novel “miniamplicon” STR multiplexes to high volume casework on degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics. 2007;1:175–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sozer AC. DNA analysis for missing person identification in mass fatalities. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR, et al. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007;1:3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidler M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, et al. Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification—advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;169:118–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh M, Reeves P, Scott S. When disaster strikes; the role of the forensic radiographer. Radiography. 2004;10:33–43.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell C, Iino M, Mansharan K, et al. Contribution of postmortem multidetector CT scanning to identification of the deceased in a mass disaster: experience gained from the 2009 Victorian bushfires. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder TD, Kraehenbuehl M, Gotsmy WF, et al. Radiologic identification of disaster victims: a simple and reliable method using CT of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e132–e138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundorff AZ, Black S, Blau S, et al. Disaster Victim Management—the role of the anthropologist. In: Payne-James J, Byard RW, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. 2nd ed. London (UK): Elsevier; 2016. p. 288–304.
   Google Scholar
• Sledzik P, Mundorff AZ. Forensic anthrology in disaster responce. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London (UK): Routlegde; 2016. p. 477–495.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart TD, editor. Personal identification in mass disasters. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser J. Silence of the limbs – reinventing forensic anthropology. HOMO – J Comp Hum Biol. 2009;60:247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black S. Disaster anthropology: the 2004 Asian tsunami. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London (UK): Routlegde; 2016. p. 507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S. It’s all about the context: reflections on the changing role of forensic anthropology in medico-legal death investigations. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2018;8:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen A, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ. Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Congram D, Fondebrider L, Fernandez E. The interconnectedness of missing persons as a problem and as a solution. In: Congram D, editor. Missing persons: multidisciplinary prespectives on the disappeared. Toronto (Canada): Canadian Scholar's Press; 2016. p. 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S. Missing persons investigations and identification: issues of scale, infrastructure, and political will. In: Morewitz SJ, Sturdy Colls C, editors. Handbook of missing persons. Switzerland: Springer; 2016. p. 227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Dirkmaat DC. Forensic anthropology at the mass fatality incident (commercial airliner) crash scene. In: Dirkmaat DC, editor. A companion to forensic anthropology. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 2012. p. 136–156.
   Google Scholar
• Dirkmaat DC, Olson GO, Klales AR, et al. The role of forensic anthropology in the recovery and interpretation of the fatal-fire victim. In: Dirkmaat DC, editor. A companion to forensic anthropology. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 2012. p. 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Mundorff AZ. Integrating forensic anthropology into disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkes MJ. The role of forensic anthropology in mass disaster resolution. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989;60:A18–A25.
   Google Scholar
• Mundorff AZ. Anthropologist-directed triage: three distinct mass fatality events involving fragmentation of human remains. In: Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains. New York (NY): Springer; 2008. p. 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Briggs C. The 2009 Victorian Bushfires disaster: the role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int. 2010;205:29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen M, Márquez-Grant N, Janaway R, editors. Forensic archaeology: a global perspective. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Interpol disaster victim identification guide. Lyon, France: Interpol; 2018. Available from: https://www.interpol.int/How-we-work/Forensics/Disaster-Victim-Identification-DVI
   Google Scholar
• Anson T, Trimble M. The role of the biological anthropologist in mass grave investigations. In: Oxenham M, editor. Forensic approaches to death, disaster and abuse. Bowen Hills (Australia): Australian Academic Press; 2008. p. 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Warnasch SC. Forensic archaeological recovery of a large‐scale mass disaster scene: lessons learned from two complex recovery operations at the world trade center site. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:584–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupras TL, Schultz JJ, Wheeler SM, et al. Forensic recovery of human remains: archaeological approaches. London (UK): CRC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Osterholtz A, Kathryn MB, Martin DL, editors. Commingled and disarticulated human remains: working toward improved theory, method, and data. New York (NY): Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Adams BJ. Commingled human remains: methods in recovery, analysis, and identification. Boston (MA): Academic Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas RM, Ubelaker DH, Byrd JE. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:952–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst CV, Soler A, Fenton TW. Personal identification in forensic anthropology. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2013. p. 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman L. Forensic anthropology and missing persons investigations. In: Morewitz SJ, Sturdy Colls C, editors. Handbook of missing persons. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2016. p. 415–425.
   Google Scholar
• Nawrocki SP, Latham KE, Bartelink EJ. Human skeletal variation and forensic anthropology. In: Latham KE, Bartelink EJ, Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. London (UK): Academic Press; 2018. p. 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Latham KE, Bartelink EJ, Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. London (UK): Academic Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dedouit F, Savall F, Mokrane F-Z, et al. Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Swift L, Flavel A. “Virtual anthropology” and radiographic imaging in the forensic medical sciences. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016;6:31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brough AL, Rutty GM, Black S, et al. Post-mortem computed tomography and 3D imaging: anthropological applications for juvenile remains. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallis J. The role of radiography in disaster victim identification. In: Errickson D, Thompson T, editors. Human remains: another dimension. London (UK): Academic Press; 2017. p. 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Robertson S, Johnston M. Disaster victim identification: new applications for postmortem computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascho D, Philipp H, Flach PM, et al. Standardized medical image registration for radiological identification of decedents based on paranasal sinuses. J Forensic Legal Med. 2018;54:96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RE, Kogon SL. Dental radiology considerations in DVI incidents: a review. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau S, Ranson D, O'Donnell C. An atlas of skeletal trauma in medico-legal contexts. London (UK): Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Messmer JM, Fierro MF. Personal identification by radiographic comparison of vascular groove patterns of the calvarium. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1986;7:159–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto JL, Tortosa C, Bedate A, et al. The 11 March 2004 Madrid terrorist attacks: the importance of the mortuary organisation for identification of victims. A critical review. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:517–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludes B. Attentats du 13 novembre à Paris: premières considérations. Rev Med Legale. 2016;7:2–4. French.
   Google Scholar
• Iino M, Aoki Y. The use of radiology in the Japanese tsunami DVI process. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2016;4:20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalders MC, Adolphi NL, Daly B, et al. Research in forensic radiology and imaging; identifying the most important issues. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2017;8:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman KL, Janssen MCL, Stull KE, et al. Dutch population specific sex estimation formulae using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;286:268.e1–268.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, et al. Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;195:148–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman KL, Dobbe JGG, Stull KE, et al. The geometrical precision of virtual bone models derived from clinical computed tomography data for forensic anthropology. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131:1155–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitchon ML, Hoppa RD. Assessing age-related morphology of the pubic symphysis from digital images versus direct observation. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viner MD, Alminyah A, Apostol M, et al. Use of radiography and fluoroscopy in disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2015;3:141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassed R, Bott E. Application of post‐mortem computed tomography to forensic odontology. In: Taylor JA, Kieser JA, editors. Forensic odontology: principles and practice. London (UK): A. Taylor and Jules A. Kieser; 2016. p. 419–437.
   Google Scholar
• Algee-Hewitt BFB, Goldberg A. Better together: thinking anthropologically about genetics. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016;160:557–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen AA, Gerretsen RR, Maat GJ. Femur, rib, and tooth sample collection for DNA analysis in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4:15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston E, Stephenson M. DNA profiling success rates from degraded skeletal remains in Guatemala. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:898–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundorff A, Davoren JM. Examination of DNA yield rates for different skeletal elements at increasing post mortem intervals. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;8:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundorff AZ, Daroven J, Weitz S. Developing an empirically based ranking order for bone sampling: examining the differential DNA yield rates between human skeletal elements over increasing post mortem intervals. Washington (DC): Department of Justice; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wright K, Mundorff A, Chaseling J, et al. An evaluation of the Thai Tsunami Victim Identification DNA operation. Forensic Sci Policy Manage: Int J. 2015;6:69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen AM, Smith VA, Ramos V, et al. Primary and secondary skeletal blast trauma. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:6–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck A, Briggs CA. The role of the anthropologists in disaster victim identification: case studies from the 2002 and 2004 terrorist attacks in Bali, Indonesia. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London (UK): Routlegde; 2016. p. 520–531.
   Google Scholar
• Weeratna JB, Shrestha R, Augustinus D, et al. Management of fragmentary human remains in mass disasters and catastrophes. Asia Pacific Medico-Legal Agencies (APMLA); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Quatrehomme G, Toupenay S, Delabarde T, et al. Forensic answers to the 14th July 2016 terrorist attack in Nice. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133:277–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikker J. Disaster victim identification. In: Greene KS, Alys L, editors. Missing persons: a handbook of research. New York (NY): Routledge; 2016. p. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Carli P, Pons F, Levraut J, et al. The French emergency medical services after the Paris and Nice terrorist attacks: what have we learnt? Lancet. 2017;390:2735–2738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig R, Rothschild M. International standards in cases of mass disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:197–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black SM, Walker G, Hackman L, et al. Disaster victim identification: the practitioner's guide. Dundee: Dundee University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kahana T, Hiss J. Identification of human remains: forensic radiology. J Clin Forensic Med. 1997;4:7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sledzik PS. Forensic anthropology in disaster response. In: Blau S, Ubelaker D, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archeology. 2nd ed. In: Blau S, Ubelaker D, editors. New York (NY): Routledge; 2009. p. 477–495.
   Google Scholar
• Telmon N, Gaston A, Chemla P. Application of the Suchey–Brooks method to three-dimensional imaging of the pubic symphysis. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wink AE. Pubic symphyseal age estimation from three-dimensional reconstructions of pelvic CT scans of live individuals. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:696–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau S, Briggs CA. The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:29–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen AM, Crowder CM. Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:1211–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd CC, Boyd DC, editors. Forensic anthropology: theoretical framework and scientific basis. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerle EH, Konigsberg LW, Jantz RL, et al. Analysis of age-at-death estimation through the use of pubic symphyseal data. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:558–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konigsberg LW, Ross AH, Jungers LW. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and medicine. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2006. p. 317–331.
   Google Scholar
• Langley-Shirley N, Jantz RL. A Bayesian approach to age estimation in modern Americans from the clavicle. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:571–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figura BJ. Advances in disaster victim identification. In: Latham KE, Bartelink EJ, Finnegan M, editor. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. London (UK): Elsevier; 2018. p. 333–341.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijning-van Dongen CJ, Slooten K, Burgers W, et al. Bayesian networks for victim identification on the basis of DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. 2009;2:466–468.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons TJ, Huel RLM. DNA and missing persons identification: practice, progress and perspectives. In: Amorim A, Budowle B, editors. Handbook of forensic genetics: biodiversity and heredity in civil and criminal investigation. Hackensack (NJ): World Scientific; 2017. p. 337–376.
   Google Scholar
• Budowle B, Ge J, Chakraborty R. Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications. Invest Genet. 2011;2.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson B, Vignaux GA, Berger CEA. Interpreting evidence: evaluating forensic science in the courtroom. London (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman DW, Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner S, Ellingham STD. Two halves make a whole: both first responders and experts are needed for the management and identification of the dead in large disasters. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya J, Shrestha R, Shrestha PK, et al. When protocols become fairy tales and gods remain buried under: excerpts from the diary of forensic experts at Ground Zero during the Mega Quake that hit Nepal. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2017;38:5–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner S, Tidball-Binz M. Humanitarian forensic action—its origins and future. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerell J. Facts and figures: Asian Tsunami Disaster. The New Scientist; 2005. Available from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9931-facts-and-figures-asian-tsunami-disaster/
   Google Scholar
• Chankaew P, Sagolj D. Hundreds of victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami have still not been identified. Business Insider; 2014. Available from: http://www.businessinsider.com/r-exclusive-thai-police-see-little-hope-of-putting-names-to-about-370-tsunami-victims-2014-12
   Google Scholar
• Cordner S. Humanitarian forensic science. The Academy: Past, Present and Future: A Symposium for Lawyers, Forensic Scientists, Medical Professionals and Others; 21/11/17; University of Technology, Sydney (UTS); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo LS, Aziz S, Mahmood MS. Beyond DVI: future identification, research and archiving. Forensic Sci Criminol. 2016;1:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cordner S, Coninx E, Kim H-J, et al., editors. Management of dead bodies after disasters: a field manual for first responders. Geneva (Switzerland): PAHO/WHO/ICRC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan OW, Sribanditmongkol P, Perera C, et al. Mass fatality management following the South Asian tsunami disaster: case studies in Thailand, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2006;3:809–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera C, Briggs C. Guidelines for the effective conduct of mass burials following mass disasters: post-Asian tsunami disaster experience in retrospect. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa Y. Quake-ravaged Japan digs mass graves. Reuters. 2011. Available from: https://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE72M1JF20110323
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri L, Mazzarelli D, Bertoglio B, et al. Challenges in the identification of dead migrants in the Mediterranean: the case study of the Lampedusa shipwreck of October 3rd 2013. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;285:121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drawdy SM, Katzmarzyk C. The missing files: the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross. In: Congram D, editor. Missing persons: multidisciplinary perspectives on the disappeared. Toronto (Canada): Canadian Scholar's Press; 2016. p. 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kranioti E, Paine R. Forensic anthropology in Europe: an assessment of current status and application. J Anthropol Sci. 2011;89:71–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. Forensic anthropology teaching practice. In: Williams A, Cassella JP, Maskell PD, editors. Forensic science education and training: a tool-kit for lectures and practitioner trainers. London (UK): John Wiley; 2017. p. 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble C, MacKinnon G. New standards for professional practice in forensic anthropology introduced in the United Kingdom. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2014;46:125–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DK, Park KH, Ko JS, et al. The role of forensic anthropology in the examination of the Daegu subway disaster (2003, Korea). J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:513–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Leditschke J, Bassed R, et al. Mortuary operations following mass fatality natural disasters: a review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13:67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black S, Hackman L. Disaster victim identification: process in United Kingdom. London (UK): Wiley Online Library; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Hewson I, Lain R. The role of the forensic odontologist in disaster victim identification: lessons for management. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:44–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutty GN, Rutty JE. Did the participants of the mass fatality exercise Operation Torch learn anything? Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:88–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H. Learning from UK disaster exercises: policy implications for effective emergency preparedness. Disasters. 2014;38:846–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen L, Juhl M, Solheim T, et al. Odontological identification of fire victims-potentialities and limitations. Int J Legal Med. 1995;107:229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassed R, Leditschke J. Forensic medical lessons learned from the Victorian Bushfire Disaster: recommendations from the Phase 5 debrief. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:73–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassed RB, Hill AJ. The use of computed tomography (CT) to estimate age in the 2009 Victorian Bushfire Victims: a case report. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 1-3:48-51.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaan RJ. Dental identification of the Victorian bushfire victims. Aust Dent J. 1984;29:105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner SM, Woodford N, Bassed R. Forensic aspects of the 2009 Victorian bushfires disaster. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lain R, Taylor J, Croker S, et al. Comparative dental anatomy in disaster victim identification: lessons from the 2009 Victorian Bushfires. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:36–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar