Recent advancements in the analysis of bone microstructure: new dimensions in forensic anthropology

References

• Kerley ER. The microscopic determination of age in human-bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1965;23:149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowsey J. Studies of Haversian systems in man and some animals. J Anat. 1966;100:857–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist J, Damsten O. A modification of Kerley's method for the microscopic determination of age in human bone. J Forensic Sci. 1969;14:205–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh IJ, Gunberg DL. Estimation of age at death in human males from quantitative histology of bone fragments. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1970;33:373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost H. Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Res. 1969;3:211–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA, et al. Skeletal tissue mechanics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Burr DB. Targeted and nontargeted remodeling. Bone. 2002;30:2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RB. Is all cortical bone remodeling initiated by microdamage? Bone. 2002;30:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amprino R. A contribution to the functional meaning of the substitution of primary by secondary bone tissue. Acta Anat (Basel). 1948;5:291–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robling AG, Stout SD. Histomorphometry of human cortical bone: applications to age estimation. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR, editors. Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson DD. The core technique in the determination of age at death of skeletons. J Forensic Sci. 1979;24:902–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout SD, Paine RR. Brief communication: histological age estimation using rib and clavicle. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992;87:111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout SD. The use of bone histomorphometry in skeletal identification: the case of Francisco Pizarro. J Forensic Sci. 1986;31:296–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Treatment of osteoporoses by manipulation of coherent bone cell-populations. Clin Orthop Relat R. 1979;143:227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Metabolism of bone. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:864–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Cortical bone volume and mass. Calcif Tissue Res. 1972;10:252.
   Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Osteon population density method of measuring Haversian bone formation rates. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1968;29:133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Tetracycline bone labeling in anatomy. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1968;29:183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen MF. Histologic estimation of age at death using the anterior cortex of the femur. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991;84:171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer S, Lazenby R, Chiang J. Brief communication: cortical remodeling data are affected by sampling location. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995;96:89–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier M, Ubelaker DH. A comparison of two methods for the microscopic determination of age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1977;46:391–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout SD, Gehlert SJ. Effects of field size when using Kerley's histological method for determination of age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982;58:123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder C. Evaluating the use of quantitative bone histology to estimate adult age at death. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Narasaki S, Laughlin SB. Intracortical bone remodeling rate differences in 3 mongoloid populations – dietary factors hypothesis. J Anthropol Soc Nip. 1990;98:178.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer S. Cortical bone age estimates from historically known adults. Z Morphol Anthropol. 1992;79:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ott SM, Oleksik A, Lu YL, et al. Bone histomorphometric and biochemical marker results of a 2-year placebo-controlled trial of raloxifene in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern DM, Ubelaker DH. Differentiating human from nonhuman bone microstructure. In: Crowder C, Stout SD, editors. Bone histology: an anthropological perspective. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Burr DB, Martin RB. Errors in bone remodeling: toward a unified theory of metabolic bone disease. Am J Anat. 1989;186:186–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currey JD. The many adaptations of bone. J Biomech. 2003;36:1487–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder C, Andronowski JM, Dominguez VD. Bone histology as an integrated tool in the process of human identification. In: Latham K, Bartelink E, Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. 1st ed. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Burr DB, Allen MR. Bone morphology and organization. Basic and applied bone biology. London (UK): Elsevier; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Currey JD. The structure of bone tissue. Bones: structure and mechanics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Morris Z, Crowder C. Evaluation of Histomorphometrics: Osteon Population Density. Annual Meeting of the Southern Anthropological Society; 2005; Chattanooga, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Cho H, Stout SD, Madsen RW, et al. Population-specific histological age-estimating method: a model for known African-American and European-American skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich JT, Crowder C, Pinto DC. Proposal and validation of definitions for intact and fragmented osteons. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists; 2012; Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper DML, Turinsky A, Sensen C, et al. Effect of voxel size on 3D micro-CT analysis of cortical bone porosity. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;80:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison KD, Cooper DM. Modalities for visualization of cortical bone remodeling: the past, present, and future. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwenhoeck, A. Microscopical observations of the structure of teeth and other bones: made and communicated, in a letter by Mr. Anthony Leeuwenhoeck. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1677–1678;12:1002–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapper A, Reumann K, Meyer W. The architecture of growing compact bone in the dog: visualization by 3D-reconstruction of histological sections. Ann Anat. 2002;184:229–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hert J, Fiala P, Petrtyl M. Osteon orientation of the diaphysis of the long bones in man. Bone. 1994;15:269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrtyl M, Hert J, Fiala P. Spatial organization of the Haversian bone in man. J Biomech. 1996;29:161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albu I, Georgia R, Urlea G, et al. Comparative data on the Haversian Canal System in the human and horse femur. Acta Anat. 1984;120:5.
   Google Scholar
• Vasciaveo FBE. Vascular channels and resorption cavities in the long bone cortex the Bovine bone. Acta Anat. 1961;47:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Harris WH. The three-dimensional anatomy of Haversian systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:419–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterio DC. The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc-Oxford. 1984;134:127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson HJG. Steriology of arbitrary particles. J Microsc. 1986;143:3–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tappen NC. Three-dimensional studies on resorption spaces and developing osteons. Am J Anat. 1977;149:301–332.
   Google Scholar
• Stout SD, Brunsden BS, Hildebolt CF, et al. Computer-assisted 3D reconstruction of serial sections of cortical bone to determine the 3D structure of osteons. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999;65:280–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boushey DR, Stultz WA. The preparation of human cross-sections. Anat Rec. 1983;207: 379–383.
   Google Scholar
• Augat P, Reeb H, Claes LE. Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1356–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CH, Burr DB. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone. 1993;14: 595–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meulen MC, Jepsen KJ, Mikic B. Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. Bone. 2001;29:101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, et al. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller R, Ruegsegger P. 3-Dimensional finite-element modeling of noninvasively assessed trabecular bone structures. Med Eng Phys. 1995;17:126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah B, Gross GJ, Dufresne TE, et al. Three-dimensional microimaging (MR mu I and mu CT), finite element modeling, and rapid prototyping provide unique insights into bone architecture in osteoporosis. Anat Rec. 2001;265:101–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fajardo RJ, Ryan TM, Kappelman J. Assessing the accuracy of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography of primate trabecular bone by comparisons with histological sections. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;118:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan TM, Ketcham RA. Femoral head trabecular bone structure in two omomyid primates. J Hum Evol. 2002;43:241–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan TM, Ketcham RA. The three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone in the femoral head of strepsirrhine primates. J Hum Evol. 2002;43:1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn G, Schultz M, Muller R, et al. Diagnostic value of micro-CT in comparison with histology in the qualitative assessment of historical human postcranial bone pathologies. Homo. 2007;58:97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper DML, Thomas CDL, Clement JG. Technological developments in the analysis of cortical bone histology: the third dimension and its potential in anthropology. In: Crowder C, Stout SD, editors. Bone histology: an anthropological perspective. Boca Ranton (FL): CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco SM, Saint C, LeBlanc PJ, et al. Maternal consumption of hesperidin and Naringin flavanones exerts transient effects to Tibia bone structure in female CD-1 offspring. Nutrients. 2017;9:E250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basillais A, Bensamoun S, Chappard C, et al. Three-dimensional characterization of cortical bone microstructure by microcomputed tomography: validation with ultrasonic and microscopic measurements. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbach D, Lakshmanan S, Peyrin F, et al. Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. J Biomech. 2012;45:2264–2270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimal Q, Raum K, Gerisch A, et al. A determination of the minimum sizes of representative volume elements for the prediction of cortical bone elastic properties. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011;10:925–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z, et al. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone. 1997;21:453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerebours C, Thomas CD, Clement JG, et al. The relationship between porosity and specific surface in human cortical bone is subject specific. Bone. 2015;72:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly E. Methods for assessing bone quality: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2128–2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco SM, Saint C, LeBlanc PJ, et al. Nutritional programming of bone structure in male offspring by maternal consumption of citrus flavanones. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;18:671–682.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco SM, Saint C, Longo AB, et al. Repeated irradiation from micro-computed tomography scanning at 2, 4 and 6 months of age does not induce damage to tibial bone microstructure in male and female CD-1 mice. Bonekey Rep. 2017;6:855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter Y, Thomas CD, Clement JG, et al. Variation in osteocyte lacunar morphology and density in the human femur – a synchrotron radiation micro-CT study. Bone. 2013;52:126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter Y, Thomas CDL, Clement JG, et al. Femoral osteocyte lacunar density, volume and morphology in women across the lifespan. J Struct Biol. 2013;183:519–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andronowski JM, Mundorff AZ, Pratt IV, et al. Evaluating differential nuclear DNA yield rates and osteocyte numbers among human bone tissue types: a synchrotron radiation micro-CT approach. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;28: 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andronowski JM, Pratt IV, Cooper DML. Occurrence of osteon banding in adult human cortical bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;164:635–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter Y, Suchorab JL, Thomas CD, et al. Normal variation in cortical osteocyte lacunar parameters in healthy young males. J Anat. 2014;225:328–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu S, Rao DS, Palnitkar S, et al. Reduced iliac cancellous osteocyte density in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1657–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu S, Rao DS, Palnitkar S, et al. Relationships between osteocyte density and bone formation rate in human cancellous bone. Bone. 2002;31:709–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth D, Gibson GJ, Fyhrie DP. Sexual dimorphism and age dependence of osteocyte lacunar density for human vertebral cancellous bone. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005;282:157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Mullender MG, Huiskes R, Versleyen H, et al. Osteocyte density and histomorphometric parameters in cancellous bone of the proximal femur in five mammalian species. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:972–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu S, Fyhrie DP, Palnitkar S, et al. Histomorphometric assessment of Haversian canal and osteocyte lacunae in different-sized osteons in human rib. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003;272:520–525.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhern DM, Ubelaker DH. Differences in osteon banding between human and nonhuman bone. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46:220–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, et al. Non invasive measurement of trabecular architecture by 3D-pQCT discriminates osteopenic women with and without fractures. J Bone Min Res. 2005;20:S91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, et al. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5045–5055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald HM, Nishiyama KK, Hanley DA, et al. Changes in trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture at peripheral sites associated with 18 months of teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waarsing JH, Day JS, van der Linden JC, et al. Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone. 2004;34:163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinck RJ, Campbell GM, Boyd SK. Radiation effects on bone architecture in mice and rats resulting from in vivo micro-computed tomography scanning. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:888–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouxsein ML. Bone quality: where do we go from here? Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:S118–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon CL, Lang TF, Augat P, et al. Image-based assessment of spinal trabecular bone structure from high-resolution CT images. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8:317–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourion-Arsiquaud S, Lukashova L, et al. Fourier transform infrared imaging of femoral neck bone: reduced heterogeneity of mineral-to-matrix and carbonate-to-phosphate and more variable crystallinity in treatment-naive fracture cases compared with fracture-free controls. J Bone Min Res. 2013;28:150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenberg D, Boonen S. The bone quality framework: determinants of bone strength and their interrelationships, and implications for osteoporosis management. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 1975;8:393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkovitz LA, Sparke P, Henwood MJ. Pediatric DXA: clinical applications. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazin D, Chappard C, Combes C, et al. Diffraction techniques and vibrational spectroscopy opportunities to characterise bones. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris MD, Mandair GS. Raman assessment of bone quality. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2160–2169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkus O, Adar F, Schaffler MB. Age-related changes in physicochemical properties of mineral crystals are related to impaired mechanical function of cortical bone. Bone. 2004;34:443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadeleta SJ, Boskey AL, Paschalis E, et al. A physical, chemical, and mechanical study of lumbar vertebrae from normal, ovariectomized, and nandrolone decanoate-treated cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Bone. 2000;27:541–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschalis EP, Shane E, Lyritis G, et al. Bone fragility and collagen cross-links. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:2000–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo WWK, Bajaj M, Mosely M, et al. Quantitative bone US measurements in neonates and their mothers. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38: 1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinacci A, Moro GE, Boehm G, et al. Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of osteopenia in preterm infants. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149:307–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereda L, Ashmeade T, Zaritt J, et al. The use of quantitative ultrasound in assessing bone status in newborn preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2003;23:655–659.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDevitt H, Tomlinson C, White MP, et al. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone in preterm and term neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F341–F342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritschl E, Wehmeijer K, De Terlizzi F, et al. Assessment of skeletal development in preterm and term infants by quantitative ultrasound. Pediatr Res. 2005;58:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad I, Nemet D, Eliakim A, et al. Body composition and its components in preterm and term newborns: a cross-sectional, multimodal investigation. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HL, Tseng HI, Yang SN, et al. Bone status and associated factors measured by quantitative ultrasound in preterm and full-term newborn infants. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88:617–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rack B, Lochmuller EM, Janni W, et al. Ultrasound for the assessment of bone quality in preterm and term infants. J Perinatol. 2012;32:218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littner Y, Mandel D, Mimouni FB, et al. Bone ultrasound velocity of infants born small for gestational age. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18:793–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson C, McDevitt H, Ahmed SF, et al. Longitudinal changes in bone health as assessed by the speed of sound in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2006;148:450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemet D, Dolfin T, Wolach B, et al. Quantitative ultrasound measurements of bone speed of sound in premature infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2001;160:736–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonnelli S, Montagnani A, Gennari L, et al. Feasibility of quantitative ultrasound measurements on the humerus of newborn infants for the assessment of the skeletal status. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:541–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanovitz I, Dolfin T, Friedland O, et al. Early physical activity intervention prevents decrease of bone strength in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;112:15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specker BL, Schoenau E. Quantitative bone analysis in children: current methods and recommendations. J Pediatr. 2005;146:726–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield MA, Craven JD, Huddleston A, et al. Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in human cortical bone in vivo – estimation of its potential value in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and metabolic bone-disease. Radiology. 1981;138:701–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SC, Coan BS, Bouxsein ML. Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone. 1997;21:119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmi G, Adams J, Link TM. Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1837–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldes AJ, Rimon A, Keinan DD, et al. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. Bone. 1995;17:363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, et al. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA. Perspectives – ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8:517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:7–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouxsein ML, Boardman KC, Pinilla TP, et al. Ability of bone properties at the femur, forearm, and calcaneus to predict the structural capacity of the proximal femur during a sideways fall. J Bone Min Res. 1995;10:S178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson PHF, Lowet G, Cheng XG, et al. Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus. Bone. 1997;20:219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njeh CF, Saeed I, Grigorian M, et al. Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:1337–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouxsein ML, Coan BS, Lee SC. Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia. Bone. 1999;25:49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet. 1996;348:511–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Ross PD, Yates AJ, et al. Prediction of fracture risk by radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound: a prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998;63:380–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, et al. Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone. 1995;16:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson PW, Taylor J, Oliver R, et al. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45–75 years. J Clin Densitom. 1998;1:219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans D, Srivastav S, Singal C, et al. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Min Res. 1999;14:644–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al. A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmant M, Kolta S, Roux C, et al. In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;35:912–919.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, et al. Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:411–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans D, Fuerst T, Duboeuf F. Quantitative ultrasound bone measurement. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding KT, Nix DA, Bachrach LK. Comparison of calcaneus ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in children at risk of osteopenia. J Clin Densitom. 2003;6:7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright LL, Glade MJ, Gopal J. The use of transmission ultrasonics to assess bone status in the human newborn. Pediatr Res. 1987;22:541–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altuncu E, Akman I, Yurdakul Z, et al. Quantitative ultrasound and biochemical parameters for the assessment of osteopenia in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:401–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littner Y, Mandel D, Cohen S, et al. Bone ultrasound velocity of appropriately grown for gestational age concordant twins. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21:269–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiallourides M, Savoia M, May J, et al. Tibial speed of sound in term and preterm infants. Biol Neonate. 2004;85:225–228.
   Google Scholar
• Littner Y, Mandel D, Mimouni FB, et al. Bone ultrasound velocity curves of newly born term and preterm infants. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2003;16:43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigo J, De Curtis M. Disorders of calcium, phosphorus and magnesium metabolism. Neonat Perinat Med. 2006;8:1492–1523.
   Google Scholar
• Gursoy T, Yurdakok M, Hayran M, et al. Bone speed of sound curves of twin and singleton neonates. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2008;21:1065–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanovitz I, Dolfin T, Regev R, et al. Bone turnover markers and bone strength during the first weeks of life in very low birth weight premature infants. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:58–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDevitt H, Tomlinson C, White MP, et al. Changes in quantitative ultrasound in infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation over the first 2 years of life: influence of clinical and biochemical changes. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007;81:263–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercy J, Dillon B, Morris J, et al. Relationship of tibial speed of sound and lower limb length to nutrient intake in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:381–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansug N, Yildirim SA, Canda E, et al. Changes in quantitative ultrasound in preterm and term infants during the first year of life. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79:428–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadik Z, Price D, Diamond G. Pediatric reference curves for multi-site quantitative ultrasound and its modulators. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:857–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love JC, Soto-Martinez ME. Development of a method to evaluate bone health of infants and young children in the medical examiner setting and emergency department. Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences: Texas Center for the Judiciary-Children's Justice Act; 2015.
   Google Scholar