Recent advances in forensic anthropology: decomposition research

References

• Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, et al. New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Yrbk Phys Anthropol. 2008;51:33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirley NR, Wilson RJ, Meadows Jantz R. Cadaver use at the University of Tennessee's Anthropological Research Facility. Clin Anat. 2011;24:372–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidoli GM, Steadman DW, Devlin JB, et al. History and development of the first anthropology research facility, Knoxville, Tennessee. In: Schotsmans EMJ, Marquez-Grant N, Forbes SL, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the depositional environment. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2017. p. 463–475.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Method and theory of forensic taphonomic research. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bugajski K, Dautartas AM, Meadows Jantz L, et al. A comparison of insect activity on different carrion types at the Anthropological Research Facility (ARF) in Knoxville, Tennessee. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci. 2018;23:561.
   Google Scholar
• Keough N, Myburgh J, Steyn M. Scoring of decomposition: a proposed amendment to the method when using a pig model for human studies. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:986–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuszewski S, Konwerski S, Fratczak K, et al. Effect of body mass and clothing on decomposition of pig carcasses. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128:1039–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland A, Myburgh J. Steyn M, et al. The effect of body size on the rate of decomposition in a temperate region of South Africa. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231:257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancher JP, Aitkenhead-Peterson JA, Farris T, et al. An evaluation of soil chemistry in human cadaver decomposition islands: potential for estimating the postmortem interval (PMI). Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:130–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechal JL, Crippen TL, Tarone AM, et al. Microbial community functional change during vertebrate carrion decomposition. PLoS One. 2013;8:11:e79035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binly C. Body donations on the rise at US medical schools. Associate Press, August 17; 2016. Washington Times. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott DJ. The Forensic Anthropology Research Facility at Texas State University: factors affecting forensic case interpretation and forensic taphonomy research in central Texas. In: Sorg MH, Haglund WD, Marden K, editors. Forensic taphonomy. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2018. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M. Temperature affects microbial decomposition of cadavers [Rattus rattus] in contrasting soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2008;40:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondor EB, Tremblay MN, Tomberlin JK, et al. The ecology of carrion decomposition. Nat Ed Knowledge. 2012;3:21.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott DJ. The forensic anthropologist as broker for cross-disciplinary taphonomic research related to estimating the postmortem interval in medicolegal death investigations. In: Boyd CC, Boyd DC, editors. Forensic anthropology: theoretical framework and scientific basis. New York (NY): Wiley; 2018. p. 251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Tomberlin JK, Mohr R, Benbow ME, et al. A roadmap for bridging basic and applied research in forensic entomology. Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:401–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton PS, Cunningham SA, Lindenmayer DB, et al. The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia. 2013;171:761–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow ME, Tomberlin JK, Tarone AM. Introduction to carrion ecology, evolution, and their applications. In: Benbow ME, Tomberlin JK, Tarone AM, editors. Carrion ecology, evolution, and their applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2018. p. 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften. 2007;94:12–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Finn JA. Ephemeral resource patches as model systems for diversity-function experiments. Oikos. 2001;92:363–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen TL, Singh B. Forensic and decomposition microbiology. In: Tomberlin JK, Benbow ME, editors. Forensic entomology: international dimensions and frontiers. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015. p. 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Reed HB Jr. A study of dog carcass communities in Tennessee, with special reference to insects. Am Midl Nat. 1958;59:213–245.
   Google Scholar
• Payne JA. A summer carrion study of the baby pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus. Ecology. 1965;46:592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez WC, Bass WM. Insect activity and its relationship to decay rates of human cadavers in East Tennessee. J Forensic Sci. 1983;28:423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriquez WC, Bass WM. Decomposition of buried bodies and methods that may aid in their location. J Forensic Sci. 1985;30:836–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones AM, et al. Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34:607–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway A. The process of decomposition: a model from the Arizona-Sonoran Desert. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt JD, et al. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1236–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass AA. The elusive universal post-mortem interval formula. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorg MH. Developing regional taphonomic standards. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Grant Report, 2008-DN-BX-K177; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bates LN, Wescott DJ. Comparison of decomposition rates between autopsied and non-autopsied human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;261:93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megyesi MS, Nawrocki SP, Haskel NH. Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem interval from decomposed human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald CM, Oxenham M. Modelling time-since-death in Australian temperate conditions. Australian. J Forensic Sci. 2009;41:27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleiber DS, Meckel LA, Siegert CC, et al. Accumulated decomposition score (ADS): an alternative method to TBS for quantifying gross morphological changes associated with decomposition. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci. 2017;23:206.
   Google Scholar
• Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadows L. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micozzi MS. Postmortem change in human and animal remains: a systematic approach. Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gill-King H. Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Goff ME. Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;49:21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love JC, Marks MK. Taphonomy and time: estimating the postmortem interval. In: Steadman DW, editor. Hard evidence: case studies in forensic anthropology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson; 2003. p. 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiethering MH, de Wit JC, Cuppers HGAM, et al. Modeling of bacterial growth with shifts in temperature. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogg GP, Zak DR, Ringelberg DB, et al. Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1997;61:475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Tibbett M. Taphonomic mycota: fungi with forensic potential. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48:168–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton V, Moffatt C, Simmons T. Quantifying the temperature of maggot masses and its relationship to decomposition. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Daalen MA, de Kat DS, Oude Grotebevelsborg BFL, et al. An aquatic decomposition scoring method to potentially predic the postmortem submersion interval of bodies recovered from the North Sea. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart BH, Ueland M. Decomposition in aquatic environments. In: Schotsmans EMJ, Marquez-Grant N, Forbes SL, editors. Taphonomy of human remains: forensic analysis of the dead and the decompositional environment. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2017. p. 235–249.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M. Moisture can be the dominant environmental parameter governing cadaver decomposition in soil. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;200:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Dent BB, Stuart BH. The effect of soil type on adipocere formation. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL. Potential determinants of post-mortem and postburial interval. In: Tibbett M, Carter DO, editors. Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2008. p. 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott DJ, Steadman DW, Miller N, et al. Validation of total body score/accumulated degree day model at three human decomposition facilities. Forensic Anthropol. 2018a;1(3):143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Lennartz AN. Assessing patterns of moisture content in decomposing, desiccated, and mummified tissue: a baseline study [thesis]. San Marcos (TX): Texas State University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haefner JN, Wallace JR, Merritt RW. Pig decomposition in lotic aquatic systems: the potential use of algal growth in establishing a post-mortem submersion interval (PMSI). J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:330–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Wallace JR. The role of aquatic insects in forensic investigations. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL, editors. Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010. p. 271–319.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton V, Lagden A, Moffatt C, et al. Predicting the post-mortem submersion interval for human remains recovered from UK waterways. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:302–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobaugh KL, Schaeffer SM, DeBruyn JM. Functional and structural succession of soil microbial communities below decomposing human cadavers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf JL, Xu ZZ, Weiss S, et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition. Science. 2016;351:158–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde ER, Haarmann DP, Lynee AM, et al. The living dead: bacterial community structure of a cadaver at the onset and end of the bloat stage of decomposition. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf JL, Carter DO, Knight R. Characterization of bacterial and microbial eukaryotic communities [including fungal] associated with corpse decomposition using Next Generation Sequencing. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Grant Report 2011-DN-BX-K533; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Javan GT, Finley SJ, Abidin Z, et al. The thanatomicrobiome: a missing piece of the microbial puzzle of death. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016:10:3389/fmicb.2016.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechal JL, Crippen TI, Benbow ME, et al. The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughput metagenomic sequencing. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128:193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damann FE, Williams DE, Layton AC. Potential use of bacterial community succession in decaying human bone for estimating postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley SJ, Pechal JL, Benbow ME, et al. Microbial signatures of cadaver gravesoil during decomposition. Microb Ecol. 2016;71:524–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz P, Dannaoui E, Gehl A, et al. Molecular identification of fungi found on decomposed human bodies in forensic autopsy cases. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:785–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomberlin JK, Crippen TL, Tarone AM, et al. A review of bacterial interactions with blow flies [Diptera: Calliphoridae] of medical, veterinary, and forensic importance. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2017;110:19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks ER, Bulling MT, Barnes KM. Microbial effects on the development of forensically important blow fly species. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keh B. Scope and applications of forensic entomology. Annu Rev Entomol. 1985;30:137–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts EP. Problems in estimating the postmortem interval in death investigations. J Agric Entomol. 1992;9:245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Catts EP, Goff ML. Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:253–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campobasso CP, Di Vella G, Introna F. Factors affecting decomposition and Diptera colonization. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;120:18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchenko MI. Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;120:89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Joy JE, Liette NL, Harrah HL. Carrion fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larval colonization of sunlit and shaded pig carcasses in West Virginia, USA. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;164:183–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons T, Cross PA, Adlam RE, et al. The influence of insects on decomposition rate in buried and surface remains. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:889–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros-Souza AS, Ferreira-Keppler RL, de Brito Agra D. Calliphoridae [Diptera: Brachycera] in urban area under natural conditions in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Entomo Brasilis. 2012;5:99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Archer M. Comparative analysis of insect succession data from Victoria [Australia] using summary statistics versus preceding mean ambient temperature models. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:404–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defilippo F, Bonilauri P, Dottori M. Effect of temperature on six different developmental landmarks within the pupal stage of forensically important blowfly Calliphora vicina [Robineau-Desvoidy] [Diptera: Calliphoridae]. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:1555–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero U, León-Cortés JL. Beetle succession and diversity between clothed sun-exposed and shaded pig carrion in a tropical dry forest landscape in Southern Mexico. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;245:143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farwig N, Brandl R, Siemann S, et al. Decomposition rate of carrion is dependent on composition not abundance of the assemblages of insect scavengers. Oecologia. 2014;175:1291–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechal JL, Benbow ME, Crippen TL, et al. Delayed insect access alters carrion decomposition and necrophagous insect community assembly. Ecosphere. 2014c;5:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kumar Garg R, Gaur JR. Various methods for the estimation of the post mortem interval from Calliphoridae: a review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2015;5:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tarone AM, Singh B, Picard CJ. Molecular biology in forensic entomology. In: Tomberlin JK, Benbow ME, editors. Forensic entomology: international dimensions and frontiers. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015. p. 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD, Reay DT, Swindler DR. Canid scavenging/disarticulation sequence of human remains in the Pacific Northwest. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34:587–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund WD. Dogs and coyotes: postmortem involvement with human remains. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD. Scattered skeletal remains: search strategy considerations for locating missing teeth. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 383–394.
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun TA, Rathbun BC. Human remains recovered from a shark’s stomach in South Carolina. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman DW, Worne H. Canine scavenging of human remains in an indoor setting. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173:78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves NM. Taphonomic effects of vulture scavenging. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:523–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault TL, Olson ZH, Beasley JC, et al. Mesopreators dominate competition for carrion in an agricultural landscape. Basic Appl Ecol. 2011;12:268–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A. Animal scavengers as agents of decomposition: the postmortem succession of Louisiana wildlife [master’s thesis]. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley MK, Hamilton MD, Giordano A. Spatial patterning of vulture scavenged human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbs GR, Martin DC. Geographic variation in the taphonomic effect of vulture scavenging: a case for southern Illinois. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:S20–S25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demo C, Cansi ER, Kosmann C, et al. Vultures and other scavenger vertebrates associated with man-sized pig carcasses: a perspective in forensic taphonomy. Zoologia. 2013;30:574–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck J, Ostericher I, Sollish G, et al. Animal scavenging and scattering and the implications of documenting the deaths of undocumented border crossers in the Sonoran Desert. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:S11–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharr LR. Using GPS tracking and long-term decomposition studies to investigate vulture scavenging and flight patterns in relation to a forensic anthropology facility in Texas [dissertation]. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ballejo F, Fernández FJ, Montalvo CI, et al. Taphonomy and dispersion of bones scavenged by New World vultures and caracaras in Northewestern Patagonia: implications for the formation of archaeological sites. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2016;8:305–315.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong Y, Meadows Jantz L, Smith J. Investigation of seasonal scavenging patterns of raccoons on human decomposition. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:467–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young A, Stillman R, Smith MJ, et al. Applying knowledge of species-typical scavenging behavior to the search and recovery of mammalian skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;61:458–466.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis KN. The effects of clothing on vulture scavenging and spatial distribution of human remains in central Texas [master’s thesis]. San Marcos (TX): Texas State University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD. Application of taphonomic models to forensic investigations [dissertation]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1445–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, et al. Necrosearch revisited: further multidisciplinary approaches to the detection of clandestine graves. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 497–509.
   Google Scholar
• Watson CJ, Forbes SL. An investigation of the vegetation associated with grave sites in Southern Ontario. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2008;41:199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Tibbett M. Microbial decomposition of skeletal muscle tissue (Ovis aries) in sandy loam soil at different temperatures. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:1139–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caccianiga M, Bottacin S, Cattaneo C. Vegetation dynamics as a tool for detecting clandestine graves. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:983–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle LE, Carter DO, Forbes SL. Measurement of ninhydrin reactive nitrogen influx into gravesoil during aboveground and belowground carcass (Sus domesticus) decomposition. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;193:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray B, Anderson DT, Wescott DJ, et al. Survey and insights into unmanned aerial vehicle-based detection and documentation of clandestine graves and human remains. Hum Biol. 2018. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescott DJ, Anderson DT, Moorhead R, et al. A forensic anthropology user interface for automating search using remotely sensed data from unmanned aerial vehicles: preliminary findings. Poster presented at: American Association of Physical Anthropologists; 2018 April 11–14; Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Kalacska M, Bell LS. Remote sensing as a tool for the detection of clandestine mass graves. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2006;39:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kalacska ME, Bell LS, Sanchez-Aofeifa A, et al. The application of remote sensing for detecting mass graves: an experimental animal case study from Costa Rica. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacks MER. The use of near-infrared remote sensing in the detection of clandestine human remains [master’s thesis]. San Marcos (TX): Texas State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vass AA. Odor mortis. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;222:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraballo NI. Identification of characteristic volatile organic compounds released during the decomposition process of human remains and analogues [dissertation]. Miami (FL): Florida International University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson CV, et al. Decompositional odor analysis database. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:760–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson MN, et al. Odor analysis of decomposing buried human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:384–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statheropoulos M, Spiliopoulou C, Agapiou A. A study of volatile organic compounds evolved from the decaying human body. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;153:147–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekeirsschieter J, Verheggen FJ, Gohy M, et al. Cadaveric volatile organic compounds released by decaying pig carcasses (Sus domesticus L.) in different biotopes. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Perrault KA, Stefanuto PH, et al. Comparison of the decomposition VOC profile during winter and summer in a moist, mid-latitude (Cfb) climate. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosier E, Loix W, Develter W, et al. Time-dependent VOC-profile of decomposed human and animal remains in laboratory environment. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:164–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua NV, Megyesi MS. A look into the past, present, and future of decomposition research and the estimation of the postmortem interval. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci. 2015;20:93.
   Google Scholar
• Henssge C, Madea B. Estimation of the time since death. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:182–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd JH, Castner JL, editors. Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Amendt J, Goff ML, Campobasso CP, et al., editors. Current concepts in forensic entomology. New York (NY): Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Budowle B, Schutzer SE, Breeze RG, et al., editors. Microbial forensics. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Academic Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tomberlin JK, Benbow ME, editors. Forensic entomology: international dimensions and frontiers. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DO, Tomberlin JK, Benbow ME, et al., editors. Forensic microbiology. New York (NY): Wiley; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbs GR, Connor M, Bytheway JA. Interobserver reliability of the total body score system for quantifying human decomposition. J Forensic Sci. 2016;62:445–451.
   Google Scholar
• Sears AM. Decomposition in central Texas and validity of a universal postmortem interval formula [master’s thesis]. San Marcos (TX): Texas State University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cockle DL, Bell LS. Human decomposition and the reliability of a 'Universal' model for post mortem interval estimations. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;253:136.e1–136e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckling JK, Spradley MK, Godde K. A longitudinal study on human outdoor decomposition in central Texas. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope MA. Differential decomposition patterns of human remains in variable environments of the Midwest [thesis]. Tampa (FL): University of South Florida; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra SC. Qualifying and quantifying the rate of decomposition in the Delaware River Valley region [master’s thesis]. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Myburgh J, L’Abbe EN, Steyn M, et al. Estimating the postmortem interval [PMI] using accumulated degree-days (ADD) in a temperate region of South Africa. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229:165e1–165e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates LN, Wescott DJ. Not all degree days are equal in the rate of decomposition: the effect of season of death on the relationship between gross postmortem decomposition and accumulated degree days. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci. 2017;22:178
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys MK, Panacek E, Green W, et al. Comparison of protocols for measuring and calculating post-mortem submersion intervals for human analogs in fresh water. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:513–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Donno A, Campobasso CP, Santoro V, et al. Bodies in sequestered and non-sequestered aquatic environments: a comparative taphonomic study using decompositional scoring system. Sci Justice. 2014;54:439–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch-Aird J, Moffatt C, Simmons T. Decomposition rate and pattern in hanging pigs. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:1155–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenthal A, Moffatt C, Simmons T. Differential decomposition patterns in charred versus un-charred remains. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud JP, Moreau G. A statistical approach based on accumulated degree-days to predict decomposition-related processes in forensic studies. J Forensic Sci. 2010;56:229–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt C, Simmons T, Lynch-Aird J. An improved equation for TBS and ADD: establishing a reliable postmortem interval framework for casework and experimental studies. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:S201–S206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd CC, Boyd DC. Epilogue: theory and science in forensic anthropology: avenues for further research and development. In: Boyd CC, Boyd DC, editors. Forensic anthropology: theoretical framework and scientific basis. New York (NY): Wiley; 2018. p. 325–327.
   Google Scholar