DNA identification of compromised samples with massive parallel sequencing

References

• INTERPOL-guidelines. 2013. www.interpol.int.
   Google Scholar
• Butler JM, McCord BR, Jung JM, et al. Rapid analysis of the short tandem repeat HUMTH01 by capillary electrophoresis. Biotechniques. 1994;17:1062–1064, 1066, 1068 passim.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton TM, Whitaker JP, Maguire CN. Identification of bodies from the scene of a mass disaster using DNA amplification of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;76:7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegle JS, Su Y, Corcoran KP, et al. Application of automated DNA sizing technology for genotyping microsatellite loci. Genomics. 1992;14:1026–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM, Hill CR. Biology and genetics of new autosomal STR loci useful for forensic DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Rev. 2012;24:15–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børsting C, Mogensen HS, Morling N. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7:345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børsting C, Morling N. Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;18:78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børsting C, Morling N. Mutations and/or close relatives? Six case work examples where 49 autosomal SNPs were used as supplementary markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5:236–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canturk KM, Emre R, Kınoglu K, et al. Current status of the use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in forensic practices. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014;18:455–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips C, Santos C, Fondevila M, et al. Inference of ancestry in forensic analysis I: autosomal ancestry-informative marker sets. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1420:233–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh S, Liu F, Wollstein A, et al. The HIrisPlex system for simultaneous prediction of hair and eye colour from DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7:98–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobrino B, Carracedo A. SNP typing in forensic genetics: a review. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;297:107–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Churchill JD, Schmedes SE, King JL, et al. Evaluation of the Illumina® Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;20:20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel R, Santos C, Phillips C, et al. A SNaPshot of next generation sequencing for forensic SNP analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;14:50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshauer DH, Davis CP, Holt C, et al. Massively parallel sequencing of forensically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms using TruSeq™ forensic amplicon. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Chow HY, Siegel D, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of Illumina's forensic STR and SNP kits on MiSeq FGx. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0187932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampmann ML, Buchard A, Borsting C, et al. High-throughput sequencing of forensic genetic samples using punches of FTA cards with buccal swabs. Biotechniques. 2016;61:149–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung KH, Osier MV, Kidd JR, et al. ALFRED: an allele frequency database for diverse populations and DNA polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:361–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:1299–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandell I, Samara R, Tillmar AO. A SNP panel for identity and kinship testing using massive parallel sequencing. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:905–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez JJ, Phillips C, Børsting C, et al. A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification. Electrophoresis. 2006;27:1713–1724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Fang R, et al. SNPs for a universal individual identification panel. Hum Genet. 2010;127:315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund G, Lodestad I, Nilsson H, et al. Experiences from DNA analysis in Sweden for the identification of tsunami victims. Progress Forensic Genet. 2006;11:744–746.
   Google Scholar
• Kling D, Tillmar AO, Egeland T. Familias 3 — Extensions and new functionality. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;13:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelius K, Karlsson AO, Holmlund G. STR data for the AmpFℓSTR Identifiler loci from Swedish population in comparison to European, as well as with non-European populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;2:e49–e52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling D, Egeland T, Tillmar AO. FamLink—a user friendly software for linkage calculations in family genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6:616–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Puente M, Phillips C, Santos C, et al. Evaluation of the Qiagen 140-SNP forensic identification multiplex for massively parallel sequensing. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;27:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira V, Mogensen HS, Børsting C, et al. Evaluation of the Precision ID Ancestry Panel for crime case work: a SNP typing assay developed for typing of 165 ancestral informative markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;27:138–145.
   Google Scholar
• Zang S, Bian Y, Chen A, et al. Developmental validation of a custom panel including 273 SNPs for forensic application using Ion Torrent PGM. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;27:50–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger AC, Alvarez ML, Davis CP, et al. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;27:52–70.
   Google Scholar
• Apaga DL, Dennis SE, Salvador JM, et al. Comparison of two massively parallel sequencing platforms using 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification. Sci Rep. 2017;7:398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar