Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances

References

• Sweet D. Forensic dental identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201:3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan OW, Sribanditmongkol P, Perera C, et al. Mass fatality management following the South Asian tsunami disaster: case studies in Thailand, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTERPOL. DVI Guide. 2018. [cited 2019 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics/Disaster-Victim-Identification-DVI
   Google Scholar
• Tsokos M, Lessig R, Grundmann C, et al. Experiences in tsunami victim identification. Int J Legal Med. 2006;120:185–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTERPOL. Tsunami Evaluation Working Group. The DVI response to the South East Asian Tsunami between December 2004 and February 2006. 2010. [cited 2019 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.interpol.int/es/content/download/588/file/INTERPOL%20Tsunami%20Evaluation%20Working%20Group.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Hewson I, Lain R. The role of the forensic odontologist in disaster victim identification: lessons for management. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:44–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blenkin M, Taylor J. Age estimation charts for a modern Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221:106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlQahtani SJ, Hector MP, Liversidge HM. Brief communication: the London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;142:481–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, Part 1. Dental identification. Br Dent J. 2011;210:219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berketa JW, James H, Lake AW. Forensic odontology involvement in disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco A, Willems G, Souza PH, et al. The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:1277–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Jain AK. Longitudinal study of fingerprint recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:8555–8560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran R, Chapman J, Tennant M, et al. Detection of tooth-colored restorative materials for forensic purposes based on their optical properties: an in vitro comparative study. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64:254–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stow L, James H, Richards L. Australian oral health case notes: assessment of forensic relevance and adherence to recording guidelines. Aust Dent J. 2016;61:236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, Part 2. Major disasters. Br Dent J. 2011;210:269–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya J, Shrestha R, Shrestha PK, et al. When protocols become fairy tales and gods remain buried under: excerpts from the diary of forensic experts at ground zero during the mega quake that hit Nepal. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2017;38:5–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner S, Ellingham STD. Two halves make a whole: both first responders and experts are needed for the management and identification of the dead in large disasters. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajapati G, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, et al. Role of forensic odontology in the identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viner MD, Robson J. Post-mortem forensic dental radiography—a review of current techniques and future developments. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2017;8:22–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton A, Alminyah A, Apostol MA, et al. Forensic odontology radiography and imaging in disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2016;6:28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran R, Walsh LJ, Forrest A, et al. Forensic applications: fluorescence properties of tooth-coloured restorative materials using a fluorescence DSLR camera. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;273:20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest AS, Wu HY. Endodontic imaging as an aid to forensic personal identification. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LF. Inadequate record keeping by dental practitioners. Aust Dent J. 2015;60:497–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manica S. A new website to aid the interpretation of antemortem dental records: www.internationaldentalcharts.org. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2014;32:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peck S, Peck L. Tooth numbering progress. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:83–84.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest AS. Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiam SL. A note on digital dental radiography in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6:197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Trochesset DA, Serchuk RB, Colosi DC. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:510–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen E, Doyle E. Dental post-mortem computed tomography for disaster victim identification: a literature review. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2018;13:5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boas FE, Fleischmann D. CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imag Med. 2012; 4:229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: a comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int. 2017;48:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps AI. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;120:895–903.e1.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyan A, Clark RK, Radford DR. Denture identification marking should be standard practice. Br Dent J. 2014;216:615–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan CN. Estimating the skull-to-camera distance from facial photographs for craniofacial superimposition. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:850–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C, Lofthouse A. The use of craniofacial superimposition for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;252:187 e1–187 e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsalamah S, Alqahtani S, Aschheim K, et al. Towards a unified blockchain-based dental record ecosystem for disaster victims identification. 5th International Conference on Health Informatics and Medical Systems; 2019 Dec 5–7. Las Vegas (NV): CSREA Press; 2019. p. 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen Torpet L. DVI System International: software assisting in the Thai tsunami victim identification process. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2005;23:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wright K, Mundorff A, Chaseling J, et al. A new disaster victim identification management strategy targeting “near identification-threshold” cases: experiences from the Boxing Day tsunami. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;250:91–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiam SL, Page M, Higgins D, et al. Validity of forensic odontology identification by comparison of conventional dental radiographs: a scoping review. Sci Justice. 2019;59:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan B, Alminyah A, Cala A, et al. Use of post-mortem computed tomography in disaster victim identification. Positional statement of the members of the Disaster Victim Identification Working Group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging; May 2014. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2014;2:114–116.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell C, Iino M, Mansharan K, et al. Contribution of postmortem multidetector CT scanning to identification of the deceased in a mass disaster: experience gained from the 2009 Victorian bushfires. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidler M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, et al. Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification—advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169:118–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brough AL, Morgan B, Rutty GN. Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and disaster victim identification. Radiol Med. 2015;120:866–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Crop A, Casselman J, Van Hoof T, et al. Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference? Neuroradiology. 2015;57:841–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder TD, Kraehenbuehl M, Gotsmy WF, et al. Radiologic identification of disaster victims: a simple and reliable method using CT of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e132–e138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam T, Kaufmann R, Ebert L, et al. Differentiation of dental restorative materials combining energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and post-mortem CT. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14:163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder TD, Thali YA, Rashid SNA, et al. Validation of post mortem dental CT for disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imag. 2016;5:25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork MB, Kvaal SI. CT and MR imaging used in age estimation: a systematic review. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2018;1:14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Taneva ED, Johnson A, Viana G, et al. 3D evaluation of palatal rugae for human identification using digital study models. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7:244–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibelli D, De Angelis D, Pucciarelli V, et al. Application of 3D models of palatal rugae to personal identification: hints at identification from 3D-3D superimposition techniques. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:1241–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneva E, Evans C, Viana G. 3D evaluation of palatal rugae in identical twins. Case Rep Dent. 2017;2017:2648312.
   Google Scholar
• Braga S, Caldas IM. Study of palatal rugae pattern following orthodontic treatment. Austral J Forensic Sci. 2016;48:305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa AG, Allouh MZ, Alshehab RM. Morphological changes in palatal rugae patterns following orthodontic treatment. J Forensic Leg Med. 2015;31:19–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Azri AR, Harford J, James H. Awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in Australia: are they keeping forensically valuable dental records? Aust Dent J. 2016;61:102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer HJ, Chansue N, Monticelli F. Implantation of radio frequency identification device (RFID) microchip in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int. 2006;157:168–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadh R, Prabhu BS. Radio frequency identification of Hurricane Katrina victims. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2006;23:184–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevissen PW, Poelman G, De Cooman M, et al. Implantation of an RFID-tag into human molars to reduce hard forensic identification labor. Part 2: physical properties. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159:S40–S46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid C, Korsvold T, Rochat A, et al. Radio frequency identification (RFID) of dentures in long-term care facilities. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:199–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADA. Australian Dental Association Policy Statement 5.17 – dental records (including ADA guidelines for dental records). 2018. [cited 2019 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.ada.org.au/Dental-Professionals/Policies/Third-Parties/5-17-Dental-Records/ADAPolicies_5-17_DentalRecords_V1.aspx
   Google Scholar
• DBA. Dental Board of Australia Guidelines on Dental Records. 2010. [cited 2019 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.dentalboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD10%2F1398&dbid=AP&chksum=IkenNC8OCIXJA96kR0OfqA%3D%3D
   Google Scholar
• Cignoni P, Callieri M, Corsini M, et al. MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Scarano V, De Chiara R, Erra U, editors. Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference (2008). London (UK): The Eurographics Association; 2008.
   Google Scholar