1,621
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

An inter-laboratory study of DNA-based identity, parentage and species testing in animal forensic genetics

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 708-713 | Received 02 Aug 2020, Accepted 03 Feb 2021, Published online: 19 Jul 2021

References

  • DNA Advisory Board (DAB). Quality assurance standards for forensic DNA testing laboratories. Forensic Sci Commun. 2000;2.
  • Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A, et al. Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119:295–302.
  • Kanthaswamy S, Oldt RF, Montes M, et al. Comparing two commercial domestic dog (Canis familiaris) STR genotyping kits for forensic identity calculations in a mixed-breed dog population sample. Anim Genet. 2019;50:105–111.
  • Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, et al. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forens Sci Int. 2000;112:17–40.
  • Gill P. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J. 2001;42:229–232.
  • Balding DJ, Buckleton J. Interpreting low template DNA profiles. Forens Sci Int Genet. 2009;4:1–10.
  • Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A. Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croat Med J. 2009;50:207–217.
  • Gill P, Puch-Solis R, Curran J. The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold—its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009;3:104–111.
  • Kanthaswamy S, Tom BK, Mattila AM, et al. Canine population data generated from a multiplex STR kit for use in forensic casework. J Forens Sci. 2009;54:829–840.
  • Dayton M, Koskinen MT, Tom BK, et al. Developmental validation of short tandem repeat reagent kit for forensic DNA profiling of canine bio­logical material. Croat Med J. 2009;50:268–285.
  • Tom BK, Koskinen MT, Dayton M, et al. Development of a nomenclature system for a canine STR multiplex reagent kit. J Forens Sci. 2010;55:597–604.
  • Ogden R, Mellanby RJ, Clements D, et al. Genetic data from 15 STR loci for forensic individual identification and parentage analyses in UK domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Forens Sci Int Genet. 2012;6:e63–e65.
  • Linacre A, Tobe SS. An overview to the investigative approach to species testing in wildlife forensic science. Investig Genet. 2011;2:1–9.
  • Kanthaswamy S, Premasuthan A. Quadriplex real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for human-canine-feline species identification and nuclear DNA quantification. Forens Sci Int Genet. 2012;6:e97–e98.
  • Kanthaswamy S. Review: domestic animal forensic genetics—biological evidence, genetic markers, analytical approaches and challenges. Anim Genet. 2015;46:473–484.
  • Pereira F, Carneiro J, Matthiesen R, et al. Identification of species by multiplex analysis of variable–length sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e203.
  • Carneiro J, Pereira F, Amorim A. SPInDel: a multifunctional workbench for species identification using insertion/deletion variants. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012;12:1190–1195.
  • Linacre A, Gusmão L, Hecht W, et al. ISFG: recommendations regarding the use of non-human (animal) DNA in forensic genetic investigations. Forens Sci Int Genet. 2011;5:501–505.