Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones

References

• Gray H. Osteologia. In: Charles Mayo Goss, editor. Gray Anatomia Charles Mayo Goss. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Guanabara Koogan; 1988. p. 80–237. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Graham A. The development and evolution of the pharyngeal arches. J Anat. 2001;199:133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvenshine RC, Pettit NJ. The hyoid bone: an overview. Cranio. 2020;38:6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson BW, Kortz MW, Al Kharazi KA. Anatomy, head and neck, skull. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser JT, Reddy V, Lugo-Pico JG. Anatomy, head and neck, cervical vertebrae. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hovorakova M, Lesot H, Peterka M, et al. Early development of the human dentition revisited. J Anat. 2018;233:135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappariello A, Ponzetti M, Rucci N. The “soft” side of the bone: unveiling its endocrine functions. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2016;28:5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida M, O’Brien CA. Basic biology of skeletal aging: role of stress response pathways. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:1197–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresguerres FGF, Torres J, Lopez-Quiles J, et al. The osteocyte: a multifunctional cell within the bone. Ann Anat. 2020;227:151422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat. 2002;15:297–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassi C, Picapedra A, Alvarez-Vaz R, et al. Sex determination in a Brazilian sample from cranial morphometric parameters — a preliminary study. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2020;1:8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rozendaal AS, Scott S, Peckmann TR, et al. Estimating sex from the seven cervical vertebrae: an analysis of two European skeletal populations. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;306:110072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čechová M, Dupej J, Brůžek J, et al. Sex estimation using external morphology of the frontal bone and frontal sinuses in a contemporary Czech population. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133:1285–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litha, Girish HC, Murgod S, et al. Gender determination by odontometric method. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9:44.
   Google Scholar
• Nagare SP, Chaudhari RS, Birangane RS, et al. Sex determination in forensic identification, a review. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10:61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Couto D, Gallassi NCD, Gomes SL, et al. Brazilian’s dental anthropometry: human identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019;11:73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo A, Pereira ML, Gouveia S, et al. Sex estimation using the mandibular canine index components. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019;15:191–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh O, Varacallo M. Anatomy, head and neck, frontal bone. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Teager SJ, Constantine S, Lottering N, et al. Physiologic closure time of the metopic suture in South Australian infants from 3D CT scans. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35:329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinchon M. The metopic suture: natural history. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65:239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohunek P. Development, structure and function of the upper airways. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2004;5:2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fatu C, Puisoru M, Rotaru M, et al. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age. Ann Anat. 2006;188:275–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp KO, Kursun Cakmak S, Aksoy S, et al. Assessment of paranasal sinus parameters according to ancient skulls’ gender and age by using cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol. 2019;78:344–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhlaghi M, Bakhtavar K, Moarefdoost J, et al. Frontal sinus parameters in computed tomography and sex determination. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016;19:22–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeland G, Aktar A, Patel BC. Anatomy, head and neck, mandible. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lipski M, Tomaszewska IM, Lipska W, et al. The mandible and its foramen: anatomy, anthropology, embryology and resulting clinical implications. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2013;72:285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris AL, Tadi P. Anatomy, head and neck, teeth. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Zohrabian VM, Poon CS, Abrahams JJ. Embryology and anatomy of the jaw and dentition. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015;36:397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ B, Wilting J. From somites to vertebral co­lumn. Ann Anat. 1992;174:23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J. 2005;5:564–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien WT Sr, Shen P, Lee P. The dens: normal development, developmental variants and anomalies, and traumatic injuries. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustrin ES, Karakas SP, Ortiz AO, et al. Pediatric cervical spine: normal anatomy, variants, and trauma. Radiographics. 2003;23:539–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification guide. 2018. Available from: https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/589/file/18Y1344%20E%20DVI_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• França GV. Antropologia médico-legal. In: Medicina legal. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Guanabara Koogan; 2017. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Borborema ML. Identificação craniométrica. In: Vanrell JP, editor. Odontologia Legal e Antropologia Forense. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Guanabara Koogan; 2019. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Donlon D, Lain R, Taylor JA. Forensic anthropo­logy. In: Taylor JA, Kieser JA, editors. Forensic odontology: principles and practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2016. p. 64–130.
   Google Scholar
• Buonasera T, Eerkens J, de Flamingh A, et al. A comparison of proteomic, genomic, and osteological methods of archaeological sex estimation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daruge E, Daruge E Jr, Francesquini Junior L. Anatomia do crânio e sua importância para o odontologista. In: Daruge E, Daruge E Jr, Francesquini L Jr, editors. Tratado de odontologia legal e deontologia. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Guanabara Koogan; 2019. p 341–352. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, et al. Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128:861–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa EM, El-Elemia AH, El-Beblawy MA, et al. Adult sex identification using digital radiographs of the proximal epiphysis of the femur at Suez Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt. Egy J Forensic Sci. 2012;2:81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Reesu GV, Augustine J, Urs AB. Forensic considera­tions when dealing with incinerated human dental remains. J Forensic Leg Med. 2015;29:13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DI, Lee SS, Kim YS. Statistical analysis of bone elements excavated from the forensic context. Korean J Phys Anthropol. 2017;23:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Williams BA, Rogers T. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:729–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbs GR, Moore-Jansen PH. A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:149–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo. 2008;59:209–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M. Compêndio de odontologia legal. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Medsi; 1997. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Zhou M. Zhang P, et al. Skull sex estimation based on wavelet transform and Fourier transform. Biomed Res Int. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8608209.
   Google Scholar
• Leth PM. The use of CT scanning in forensic autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2007;3:65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bornik A, Urschler M, Schmalstieg D, et al. Integrated computer-aided forensic case analysis, presentation, and documentation based on multimodal 3D data. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;287:12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin HM, Sholts SB, Mosca LA. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of popu­lation, age, and body size. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;154:259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut O, Petaros A, Hizliol I, et al. Sexual dimorphism in frontal bone roundness quantified by a novel 3D-based and landmark-free method. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;261:162 e1–e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelzer SC, Kuemmel IV, Koelzer JT, et al. Definitions of frontal bone inclination: applicability and quantification. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;303:109929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petaros A, Garvin HM, Sholts SB, et al. Sexual dimorphism and regional variation in human frontal bone inclination measured via digital 3D mo­dels. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2017;29:53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikita E. Quantitative sex estimation based on cranial traits using R functions. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64:175–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer BM, Sholts SB, Garvin HM, et al. Sexual dimorphism in human browridge volume measured from 3D models of dry crania: a new digital morphometrics approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;222:400 e1–e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlaza NA. Sex determination from the frontal bone: a geometric morphometric study. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:1330–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Fatah EE, Shirley NR, Jantz RL, et al. Improving sex estimation from crania using a no­vel three-dimensional quantitative method. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:590–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, et al. Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229:158.e1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaafrane M, Ben Khelil M, Naccache I, et al. Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:853–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cechova M, Dupej J, Bruzek J, et al. A test of the Bulut et al. (2016) landmark-free method of quantifying sex differences in frontal bone roundness in a contemporary Czech sample. J Forensic Sci. 2020;66:694–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabanciogullari V, Kosar MI, Salk I, et al. Diploe thickness and cranial dimensions in males and females in mid-Anatolian population: an MRI study. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219:289.e1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker PL. Problems of preservation and sexism in sexing: some lessons from historical collections for palaeodemographers. In: Saunders SR, Herring A, editors. Grave reflections: portraying the past through cemetery studies. Toronto (Canada): Canadian Scholars Press; 1995. p. 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tang JP, Hu DY, Jiang FH, et al. Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;183:104.e1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Mahima VG, Patil K. Radiomorphometric analysis of frontal sinus for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6:177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Verma K, Nahar P, Singh MP, et al. Use of frontal sinus and nasal septum pattern as an aid in personal identification and determination of gender: a radiographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC71–ZC74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Wang J, Zhang S, et al. The application of frontal sinus index and frontal sinus area in sex estimation based on lateral cephalograms among Han nationality adults in Xinjiang. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;56:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belaldavar C, Kotrashetti VS, Hallikerimath SR, et al. Assessment of frontal sinus dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo IGC, Prado FB, Muglia VF. Fontal sinus analysis for use in human identification. Braz J Forensic Sci Med Law Bioeth. 2015;5:42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Choi IGG, Duailibi-Neto EF, Beaini TL, et al. The frontal sinus cavity exhibits sexual dimorphism in 3D cone-beam CT images and can be used for sex determination. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63:692–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzeler AMV, Alves-Junior SM, Ayres L, et al. Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: a new approach via cone beam compu­terized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133:1977–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal M, Acharya AB, Sattur AP, et al. Are frontal sinuses useful indicators of sex? J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20:91–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, et al. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:S13–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves CFP. Estimativa do sexo através de características métricas da mandíbula [masters dissertation]. Coimbra (Portugal): Coimbra University; 2012. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho SP, Brito LM, Paiva LA, et al. Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:358–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinelnikov RD. Atlas of human anatomy. 3rd ed. Vol. 1, The science of bones, joints, ligaments and muscles. Moscow (Russia): MIR Publishers; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Vinay G, Mangala Gowri SR, Anbalagan J. Sex ­determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2671–2673.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anatomy. 1999;195:491–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loth SR, Henneberg M. Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996;99:473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Deng M, Wang W, et al. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a contemporary Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;255:9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBrul EL Sicher and DuBrul’s oral anatomy. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Castro JCBB. Antropometria óssea e identificação do sexo [Bone anthropometry and sex identification] [masters’ dissertation]. Campinas (Brazil): Campinas State University; 2017. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Chole RH, Patil RN, Balsaraf Chole S, et al. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiol. 2013;2013:453763.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira FC. Ramo mandibular humano como indicador do sexo em adultos [masters’ dissertation]. Porto (Portugal): Porto University; 2017. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez TT, Michel-Crosato E, Benedicto EN, et al. Accuracy of mandibular measurements of sexual dimorphism using stabilizer equipment. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamba T. d O, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F. Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;38:106–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharoshah MAA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS, et al. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17:213–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhaes-Caldas D, Oliveira ML, Groppo FC, et al. Volumetric assessment of the dental crown for sex estimation by means of cone-beam computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;303:109920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Kamath VV, Satelur K, et al. Sexual dimorphism in tooth morphometrics: an evaluation of the parameters. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning. Angle Orthod. 1967;37:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitaneanu C, Willems G, Thevissen P. A syste­matic review of odontological sex estimation me­thods. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• García-Campos C, Martinón-Torres M, Martínez de Pinillos M, et al. Modern humans sex estimation through dental tissue patterns of maxillary canines. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;167:914–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:157–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM, et al. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:326–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khangura RK, Sircar K, Singh S, et al. Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3:81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders SR, Chan AH, Kahlon B, et al. Sexual dimorphism of the dental tissues in human permanent mandibular canines and third premolars. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;133:735–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz GT, Dean MC. Sexual dimorphism in modern human permanent teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128:312–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angadi PV, Hemani S, Prabhu S, et al. Analyses of odontometric sexual dimorphism and sex assessment accuracy on a large sample. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20:673–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iscan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;26:160–164.
   Google Scholar
• Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary central incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:254–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal B, Gorea RK, Gorea A, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical and experimental methods for determination of sexual dimorphism of mandibular canines. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;44:20–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarchi B, Hall S, Roncal-Herrero T, et al. Protein sequences bound to mineral surfaces persist into deep time. Elife. 2016;27.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis D, Gibelli D, Gaudio D, et al. Sexual dimorphism of canine volume: a pilot study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015;17:163–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau EC, Mohandas TK, Shapiro LJ, et al. Human and mouse amelogenin gene loci are on the sex chromosomes. Genomics. 1989;4:162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesalo L. Sex chromosomes and human growth. A dental approach. Hum Genet. 1997;101:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris EF, Hicks JD. A radiographic assessment of enamel thickness in human maxillary incisors. Arch Oral Biol. 1998;43:825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paranhos LR, Jóias RP, Velasco LG, et al. Prevalence of the different maxillary central incisor shapes in individuals with natural normal occlusion. Braz J Oral Sci. 2010;9:104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Marino EA. Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995;97:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow EJ, Pastor RF. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra—a test of the method. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:165–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescott DJ. Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci. 2000;45:462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JV, DiBennardo R, Linares GH, et al. Metropolitan forensic anthropology team (MFAT) studies in identification: 1. Race and sex assessment by discriminant function analysis of the ­postcranial skeleton. J Forensic Sci. 1984;29:798–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders S. Subadult skeletons and growth-related studies. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders S, editors. Biological anthropoloy of the human skeleton. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss, Inc; 2000. p. 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bethard JD, Seet BL. Sex determination from the second cervical vertebra: a test of Wescott’s me­thod on a modern American sample. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:101–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama I, Navega D, Cunha E. Sex estimation using the second cervical vertebra: a morphometric ana­lysis in a documented Portuguese skeletal sample. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germano V, Ulbricht V, Schmidt CM, et al. Sex dimorphism by the axis vertebra in a Brazilian osteological collection. Rev Bras Odontol Leg. 2019;6:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Torimitsu S, Makino Y, Saitoh H, et al. Determination of sex on the basis of hyoid bone measurements in a Japanese population using multidetector computed tomography. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:907–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindschuh SC, Dupras TL, Cowgill LW. Determination of sex from the hyoid bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;143:279–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logar CJ, Peckmann TR, Meek S, et al. Determination of sex from the hyoid bone in a contemporary White population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;39:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Kohli A, Aggarwal NK, et al. Study of age of fusion of hyoid bone. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2008;10:253–256.
   Google Scholar
• Harjeet K, Synghal S, Kaur G, et al. Time of fusion of greater cornu with body of hyoid bone in Northwest Indians. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2010;12:223–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DI, Lee UY, Park DK, et al. Morphometrics of the hyoid bone for human sex determination from digital photographs. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:979–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay PP. Determination of sex from an autopsy sample of adult hyoid bones. Med Sci Law. 2012;52:152–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher E, Austin D, Werner HM, et al. Hyoid bone fusion and bone density across the lifespan: prediction of age and sex. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12:146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balseven-Odabasi A, Yalcinozan E, Keten A, et al. Age and sex estimation by metric measurements and fusion of hyoid bone in a Turkish population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20:496–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar