Forensic profiling of non-volatile organic compounds in soil using ultra-performance liquid chromatography: a pilot study

References

• Nanzyo M, Kanno H. Inorganic constituents in soil, basics and visuals. Singapore: Springer Open; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Covaciu FD, Floare-Avram V, Magdas DA, et al. Distribution and fate of persistent organochlorine pesticides on the soil-forage-milk chain in three Transylvanian farms. Anal Lett. 2021;54:265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wołejko E, Wydro U, Jabłońska-Trypuć A, et al. The effect of sewage sludge fertilization on the concentration of PAHs in urban soils. Environ Pollut. 2018; 232:347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awa SH, Hadibarata T. Removal of heavy metals in contaminated soil by phytoremediation mechanism: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020;231:47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljac M, Bogner D, Bralic M, et al. Cadmium and lead distribution in marine soil sediments, terrestrial soil, terrestrial rock, and atmospheric particulate matter around split, Crotia. Anal Lett. 2014;47:1952–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye K. Geological and soil evidence forensic applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pansu M, Gautheyrou J. Handbook of soil analysis mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. Netherlands: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlidis G, Karasali H, Tsihrintzis VA. Development and validation of a simple and efficient method for the determination of pendimethalin and its metabolite M455H001 in soil by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Anal Lett. 2019;52:685–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Xu Y, Sun Y, et al. Determination of carbendazim and diethofencarb in cotton and soil by high performance liquid chromatography. Anal Lett. 2016;49:1631–1639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KA, Mullins CE, editors. Soil and environmental analysis: physical methods, revised, and expanded. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2003; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KA, Cresser MS, editors. Soil and environmental ana­lysis: modern instrumental techniques. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tang M, Li L, Zhong Q, et al. Determination of herbicides in soil by dispersive solid-phase extraction, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, and high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Lett. 2014;47:2871–2881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan N, Guo F, Tian Q, et al. Screening and quantification of organic pollutants in soil using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Lett. 2018;51:955–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Scott KR, Ainley J, et al. Journey history reconstruction from the soils and sediments on footwear: an empirical approach. Sci Justice. 2019;59:306–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam M. Soil as significant evidence in a sexual assault/attempted homicide case. In: Pye K, Croft DJ, editors. Forensic geoscience: principals, techniques and applications. London (UK): Geological Society Special Publications; 2004. p. 295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Woods B, Lennard C, Kirkbride KP, et al. Soil exa­mination for a forensic trace evidence laboratory—Part 3: a proposed protocol for the effective triage and management of soil examinations. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 262:46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffell A, Sandiford A. Maximising trace soil evidence: an improved recovery method developed during investigation of a $26 million bank robbery. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209:e1–e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flojgaard C, Froslev TG, Brunbjerg AK, et al. Predicting provenance of forensic soil samples: linking soil to ecological habitats by metabarcoding and supervised classification. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0202844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo VF, Barbar LC, Zamora PGP, et al. Chemical, physical and mineralogical characterization of soils from the Curitiba Metropolitan Region for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179:123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onions KL. Characterization of soils with the use of instrumental techniques: a multivariate forensic study [dissertation]. Brisbane (Australia): Queensland University of Technology; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pye K, Blott SJ. Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;144:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick RW. Soil: forensic analysis. In: Jamieson A, Moenssens AA, editors. Wiley encyclopedia of forensic science. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2013. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Netherlands: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bommarito CR, Sturdevant AB, Szymanski DW. Analysis of forensic soil samples via high-performance liquid chromatography and ion chromatography. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RJ, Peterson HL, Young J, et al. The forensic analysis of soil organic by FTIR. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;108:107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards H, Munshi T, Scowen I, et al. Development of oxidative sample preparation for the analysis of forensic soil samples with near-IR Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc. 2012;43:323–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland DJ, Trinler WA. An investigation of the potential of high performance liquid chromatography for the comparison of soil samples. Forensic Sci Int. 1981;18:201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland DJ, Trinler WA, Farmer MD. Comparison of soil samples by high performance liquid chromatography augmented by absorbance rationing. Forensic Sci Int. 1992;52:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods B, Lennard C, Kirkbride KP, et al. Soil exa­mination for a forensic trace evidence laboratory—Part 1: spectroscopic techniques. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;245:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch G, Dawson LA, Ross JM, et al. The discrimination of geoforensic trace material from close proximity locations by organic profiling using HPLC and plant wax marker analysis by GC. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;288:310–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch G, Dawson LA, Brewer MJ, et al. The identification of markers for Geoforensic HPLC profiling at close proximity sites. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;272:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch G, Morgan RM, Bull PA. High performance liquid chromatography as a valuable tool for geoforensic soil analysis. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49:421–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumustas M, Kurbanoglu S, Uslu B, et al. UPLC versus HPLC on drug analysis: advantageous, applications and their validation parameters. Chromatographia. 2013;76:1365–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahar L, Onder A, Sarker SD. A review on the recent advances in HPLC, UHPLC and UPLC ana­lyses of naturally occurring cannabinoids (2010–2019). Phytochem Anal. 2020;31:413–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz ME. UPLCTM: an introduction and review. J Liquid Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2005;28:1253–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi H, William LJ. Principal component analysis. WIREs Comp Stat. 2010;2:433–459.
   Google Scholar
• Bro R, Smilde AK. Principal component analysis. Anal Methods. 2014;6:2812–2831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Larose DT. Hierarchical and k-means clustering. In: Discovering knowledge in data: an introduction to data mining. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2004. p. 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan JW. Communicating with the baseline, LC troubleshooting. Europe: LC GC; 2001. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schellinger AP, Carr PW. Isocratic and gradient elution chromatography: a comparison in terms of speed, retention reproducibility and quantitation. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1109:253–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B, Li Z, Wu J, et al. Quality control of Gastrodia elata by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) and principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). Anal Lett. 2020;53:746–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Chen M. Characterization of automobile plastics by principal component analysis and near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Lett. 2015;48:301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agilent Technologies. Retention time reproducibility of the Agilent 6890 Plus GC. 1999. [Assessed 2020 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/59686420.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krull IS, Swartz M. Analytical method development and validation for the academic researcher. Anal Lett. 1999;32:1067–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters Corporation. Retention time vs. peak area, what is the relationship? Performance Perspectives. 1997. Available from: https://www.gimitec.com/file/wpp19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papadoyannis IN, Samanidou VF. Validation of HPLC instrumentation. J Liquid Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2004; 25:753–783.
   Google Scholar
• Guillaume Y, Guinchard C. Marked differences between acetonitrile/water and methanol/water mobile phase systems on the thermodynamic behavior of benzodiazepines in reversed phase li­quid chromatography. Chromatographia. 1995;41:84–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimadzu. Tips for practical HPLC analysis—separation know-how. LC World Talk Special. 2:6–8. [Accessed 2020 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.shimadzu.eu/sites/shimadzu.seg/files/Tips_for_practical_HPLC_analysis-Separation_Know-how.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lin B, Gao H, Lai H. Spatial characterization of arsenic, cadmium, and lead concentrations in tobacco leaves and soil. Anal Lett. 2016;49:1622–1630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar