Investigation on the genetic-inconsistent paternity cases using the MiSeq FGx system

References

• Dumache R, Ciocan V, Muresan C, et al. Molecular DNA analysis in forensic identification. Clin Lab. 2016;62:245–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Wang Y, Zhang D, et al. Mutation analysis of 21 autosomal short tandem repeats in Han population from Hunan, China. Ann Hum Biol. 2019;46:254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aşicioglu F, Oguz-Savran F, Ozbek U. Mutation rate at commonly used forensic STR loci: paternity testing experience. Dis Markers. 2004;20:313–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhang XN, Wu D, et al. Mutations of short tandem repeat loci in cases of paternity testing in Chinese. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:1203–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Aceves ME, Romero Rentería O, Díaz-Navarro XX, et al. Paternity tests in Mexico: results obtained in 3005 cases. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;55:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatko BE, Gardner AF, Ausubel FM. Overview of next-generation sequencing technologies. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2018;122:e59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meiklejohn KA, Robertson JM. Evaluation of the precision ID identity panel for the ion Torrent™ PGM™ sequencer. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;31:48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Bian Y, Chen A, et al. Developmental validation of a custom panel including 273 SNPs for forensic application using ion torrent PGM. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;27:50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno LI, Galusha MB, Just R. A closer look at Verogen’s ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit autosomal and Y-STR data for streamlined analysis of routine reference samples. Electrophoresis. 2018;39:2685–2693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier C, Parson W. Evaluation of the illumina ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit — MPS forensic application for the MiSeq FGx™ benchtop sequencer. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;28:188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S B S Silva D, Sawitzki FR, Scheible MKR, et al. Paternity testing using massively parallel sequencing and the PowerSeq™ AUTO/Y system for short tandem repeat sequencing. Electrophoresis. 2018;39:2669–2673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhao X, Ma K, et al. Applying massively parallel sequencing to paternity testing on the ion torrent personal genome machine. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;31:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollard C, Ausset L, Chantrel Y, et al. Automation and developmental validation of the ForenSeq™ DNA signature preparation kit for high-throughput analysis in forensic laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;40:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill JD, Schmedes SE, King JL, et al. Evaluation of the Illumina® beta version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;20:20–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson P, Levy J, Rouyer M, et al. Evaluation of 3 molecular-based assays for microsatellite instability detection in formalin-fixed tissues of patients with endometrial and colorectal cancers. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specifications for paternity testing issued. SF/Z JD0105001-2016, issued on 22 September, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Luo H, Huang L, et al. Microsatellite instability: a review of what the oncologist should know. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starinsky-Elbaz S, Ram T, Voskoboinik L, et al. Weight-of-evidence for DNA identification of missing persons and human remains using CODIS. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020;16:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Yang Y, Yang Q, et al. Analytical validation of an RI sample cartridge with the RapidHIT® ID system. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135:1257–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Zhang S, Li J, et al. Detecting genetic hypermutability of gastrointestinal tumor by using a forensic STR kit. Front Med. 2020;14:101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Zhang S, Xiong L, et al. Investigation of an alternative marker for hypermutability evaluation in different tumors. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfranco F, Kamischke A, Zitzmann M, et al. Klinefelter’s syndrome. Lancet. 2004;364:273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanakis GA, Nieschlag E. Klinefelter syndrome: more than hypogonadism. Metabolism. 2018;86:135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill JD, Novroski NMM, King JL, et al. Population and performance analyses of four major populations with Illumina’s FGx forensic genomics system. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;30:81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardini AC, Rodenbusch R, Schumacher S, et al. Mutation rate estimates for 13 STR loci in a large population from Rio Grande Do Sul, Southern Brazil. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127:45–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Xie Y, Li X, et al. Prenatal paternity testing (NIPAT) through maternal plasma DNA sequencing: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balanovsky O, Zhabagin M, Agdzhoyan A, et al. Deep phylogenetic analysis of haplogroup G1 provides estimates of SNP and STR mutation rates on the human Y-chromosome and reveals migrations of Iranic speakers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun JX, Helgason A, Masson G, et al. A direct characterization of human mutation based on microsatellites. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1161–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar