Toward development of ecosystem asset accounts at the national level

References

• ABS. 2014. Australian Environmental-Economic Accounts 2014. 92. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwala, M., G. Atkinson, C. Baldock, and B. Gardiner. 2014. “Natural Capital Accounting and Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 4: 520–522. doi:10.1038/nclimate2257.
   Google Scholar
• Alkemade, R., M. Oorschot, L. Miles, C. Nellemann, M. Bakkenes, and B. Ten Brink. 2009. “GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss.” Ecosystems 12: 374–390. doi:10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5.
   Google Scholar
• Balvanera, P., I. Siddique, L. Dee, A. Paquette, F. Isbell, A. Gonzalez, J. Byrnes, M. I. O’Connor, B. A. Hungate, and J. N. Griffin. 2013. “Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps.” BioScience 64: 49–57. doi:10.1093/biosci/bit003.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., and J. Boyd. 2012. “The Architecture and Measurement of an Ecosystem Services Index.” Sustainability 4: 430–461. doi:10.3390/su4040430.
   Google Scholar
• Brander, L., I. Bräuer, H. Gerdes, A. Ghermandi, O. Kuik, A. Markandya, S. D. Navrud, et al. 2011. “Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands.” Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (3): 395–413. doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, B., and L. Hein. 2013. “Towards a Consistent Approach for Ecosystem Accounting.” Ecological Economics 90: 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2006. Land Accounts for Europe 1990–2000: Towards Integrated Land and Ecosystem Accounting. European Environment Agency. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Frélichová, J., D. Vačkář, A. Pártl, B. Loučková, Z. V. Harmáčková, and E. Lorencová. 2014. “Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic.” Ecosystem Services 8: 110–117. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Haberl, H., K. H. Erb, and F. Krausmann. 2014. “Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production: Patterns, Trends, and Planetary Boundaries.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39: 363–391. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121912-094620.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., M. A. Potschin, and F. Kienast. 2012. “Indicators of Ecosystem Service Potential at European Scales: Mapping Marginal Changes and Trade-Offs.” Ecological Indicators 21: 39–53. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, J. E. 2005. National Environmental Accounting: Bridging the Gap between Ecology and Economy, 272. Washington: Resources for the Future, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, L., K. Bagstad, B. Edens, C. Obst, R. de Jong, and J. P. Lesschen. 2016. “Defining Ecosystem Assets for Natural Capital Accounting.” PloS ONE 11 (11): e0164460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164460.
   Google Scholar
• La Notte, A., S. Vallecillo, C. Polce, G. Zulian, and J. Maes. 2017. Implementing an EU System of Accounting for Ecosystems and Their Services. Initial Proposals for the Implementation of Ecosystem Services Accounts, EUR 28681 EN; Publications Office of the European Union, JRC107150 Luxembourg, doi:10.2760/214137.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M., R. S. Hails, P. Cryle, J. Harlow, and S. J. Clarke. 2015. “Review: Towards a Risk Register for Natural Capital.” Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 641–653. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12431.
   Google Scholar
• Mäler, K. G., S. Aniyar, and Å. Jansson. 2008. “Accounting for Ecosystem Services as a Way to Understand the Requirements for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (28): 9501–9506. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708856105.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Harms, M. J., S. Gelcich, R. M. Krug, F. J. F. Maseyk, H. Moersberger, A. Rastogi, G. Wambugu, C. B. Krug, E. M. Spehn, and U. Pascual. 2018. “Framing Natural Assets for Advancing Sustainability Research: Translating Different Perspectives into Actions.” Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0599-5.
   Google Scholar
• Obst, K. G. 2015. “Reflections on Natural Capital Accounting at the National Level: Advances in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6 (3): 315–339. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2014-0020.
   Google Scholar
• ONS. 2018. UK Natural Capital: Ecosystem Service Accounts, 1997 to 2015. Office for National Statistics and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), 23.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. L. 2009. “Assessing Benefit Transfer for the Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 38–45. doi:10.1890/080091.
   Google Scholar
• Potschin-Young, M., R. Haines-Young, C. Görg, U. Heink, C. Jax, and C. Schleyer. 2018. “Understanding the Role of Conceptual Frameworks: Reading the Ecosystem Service Cascade.” Ecosystem Services 29: 428–440. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Remme, R. P., B. Edens, M. Schröter, and L. Hein. 2015. “Monetary Accounting of Ecosystem Services: A Test Case for Limburg Province, the Netherlands.” Ecological Economics 112: 116–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, P. K., and C. S. Campagne. 2017. “From Ecosystem Integrity to Ecosystem Condition: A Continuity of Concepts Supporting Different Aspects of Ecosystem Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 29: 63–68. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.009.
   Google Scholar
• Ruijs, A., M. van der Heide, and J. van den Berg. 2018. Natural Capital Accounting for the Sustainable Development Goals. Current and Potential Uses and Steps Forward, 38. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ruijs, A., and P. van Egmond. 2017. “Natural Capital in Practice: How to Include Its Value in Dutch Decision-Making Processes.” Ecosystem Services 25: 106–116. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.025.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, R., R. Chaplin-Kramer, S. Wood, A. Guerry, H. Tallis, and T. Ricketts. (Eds.) 2018. InVEST +VERSION+ User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Commission. 2018. “Global Assessment of Environmental-Economic Accounting and Supporting Statistics.” https://seea.un.org/content/global-assessment-environmental-economic-accounting
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., F. Isbell, and J. M. Cowles. 2014. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45: 471–493. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2014a. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 Central Framework. United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. United Nations, New York: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• UN.2014b. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. United Nations, New York: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2014c. Seea Implementation Guide. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: Statistics Division, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2017. Technical Recommendations in Support of the System of Environmental – Economic Accounting 2012 – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting, 193. United Nations: White cover publication.
   Google Scholar
• UNSD. 2013. “SEEA Implementation Guide – Draft Version 1.0.” Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Statistics Division. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/workshops/Uganda2013/R-P2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vačkář, D., I. Grammatikopoulou, J. Daněk, and E. Lorencová. 2018. “Methodological Aspects of Ecosystem Service Valuation at the National Level.” One Ecosystem 3: e25508. doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e25508.
   Google Scholar
• Vačkář, D., Z. V. Harmáčková, H. Kaňková, and K. Stupková. 2016. “Human Transformation of Ecosystems: Comparing Protected and Unprotected Areas with Natural Baselines.” Ecological Indicators 66: 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Vardon, M., P. Burnett, and S. Dovers. 2016. “The Accounting Push and the Policy Pull: Balancing Environment and Economic Decisions.” Ecological Economics 124: 145–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.021.
   Google Scholar
• WAVES. 2017. Annual Report 2017. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, 60 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J. L. 2007. “Implementation of Land and Ecosystem Accounts at the European Environment Agency.” Ecological Economics 61: 695–707. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.023.
   Google Scholar
• Wurtzebach, Z., and C. Schultz. 2016. “Measuring Ecological Integrity: History, Practical Applications, and Research Opportunities.” BioScience 66 (6): 446–457. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw037.
   Google Scholar