Adjusted macroeconomic indicators to account for ecosystem degradation: an illustrative example

References

• Bartelmus, P. 2014. “Environmental–Economic Accounting: Progress and Digression in the SEEA Revisions.” Review of Income and Wealth 60 (4): 887–904.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelmus, P. 2015. “Do we need ecosystem accounts?” Ecological Economics 118: 292–298. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.026.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelmus, P., C. Stahmer, and J. van Tongeren. 1991. “Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting: Framework for a SNA Satellite System.” Review of Income and Wealth 37 (2): 111–148. doi:10.1111/roiw.1991.37.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., B. Kriström, and K.-G. Mäler. 1995. “Current Issues in Resource Accounting.” In Current Issues in Environmental Economics, edited by P. O. Johansson, B. Kriström, and K.-G. Mäler, 117–152. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eigenraam, M., and C. Obst. 2018. “Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services.” Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 4 (11): 247–260. doi:10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Essential SNA: Building the basics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, World Bank. System of National Accounts 2008. New York: United Nations, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwick, J. M. 1990. “Natural resources, national accounting and economic depreciation.” Journal of Public Economics 43 (3): 291–304. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(90)90002-Y.
   Google Scholar
• La Notte, A., and S. Dalmazzone. 2018. “Sustainability assessment and causality nexus through ecosystem service accounting: The case of water purification in Europe.” Journal of Environmental Management 223: 964–974. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.072.
   Google Scholar
• La Notte, A., S. Vallecillo, A. Marques, and J. Maes. 2019a. “Beyond the economic boundaries to account for ecosystem services.” Ecosystem Services 35: 116–129. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.007.
   Google Scholar
• La Notte, A., S. Vallecillo, and J. Maes. 2019b. “Capacity as ‘virtual stock’ in ecosystem services accounting.” Ecological Indicators 98 (2019): 158–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.066.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Capital Coalition. 2016. “Natural Capital Protocol.” www.naturalcapitalcoalition.org/protocol
   Google Scholar
• Natural Capital Declaration. 2015. “UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative and Global Canopy Programme.” Towards Including Natural Resource Risks in Cost of Capital: State of play and the way forward.
   Google Scholar
• Obst, C. 2015. “Reflections on natural capital accounting at the national level: Advances in the system of environmental-economic accounting.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6 (3): 315–339. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2014-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, S. 2015. “Developing the ecological balance sheet for agricultural sustainability.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6 (2): 110–113. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2014-0040.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvy, S., R. Burritt, D. Walsh, C. Obst, P. Meadows, P. Muradzikwa, and M. Eigenraam. 2018. “Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation.” Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 4 (11): 261–276. doi:10.1080/20964129.2018.1544837.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1993. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (interim version). New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1994. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Agenda 21 (the United Nations Programme of Action from Rio de Janeiro). New York: United Nations. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. Technical Recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. New York: United Nations, 192.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation, World Bank. 2003. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, Studies in Methods: Handbook of National Accounting. p. 594.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation, World Bank. 2014a. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation, World Bank. 2014b. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Vallecillo, S., A. La Notte, G. Kakoulaki, N. Roberts, J. Kamberaj, F. Dottori, L. Feyen, C. Rega, and J. Maes. 2019. “Ecosystem services accounting.” Part II-Pilot accounts for crop and timber provision, global climate regulation and flood control, EUR 29731 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-76-02905-2. doi:10.2760/631588, JRC116334
   Google Scholar
• Vardon, M., J. Castaneda, M. Nagy, and S. Schenau. 2018. “How the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting can improve environmental information systems and data quality for decision making.” Environmental Science and Policy 89: 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J. L. 2011. An experimental framework for ecosystem capital accounting in Europe. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency, p. 46.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. 1976. “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90 (1): 156–162. doi:10.2307/1886092.
   Google Scholar