1,547
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea

, ORCID Icon &
Article: 1980437 | Received 07 Apr 2021, Accepted 09 Sep 2021, Published online: 01 Nov 2021

References

  • CNR Korea. 2013. Sustainability Evaluation Report Using Survey for Residents in Gyeonggi-do. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: Gyeonggi-do Council for Sustainable Development.
  • Glass, L.-M., and J. Newig. 2019. “Governance for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How Important are Participation, Policy Coherence, Reflexivity, Adaptation and Democratic Institutions?” Earth System Governance 2: 100031. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031.
  • Griggs, D., M. Stafford Smith, J. Rockström, M. C. Öhman, O. Gaffney, G. Glaser, N. Kanie, I. Noble, W. Steffen, and P. Shyamsundar. 2014. “An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development Goals.” Ecology and Society 19 (4): 49–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07082-190449.
  • Gyeonggi Research Institute(GRI). 2013. A Study on Indicator Development to Monitor Gyeonggi-do’s Living Environmental Welfare. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: GRI.
  • Gyeonggi Research Institute(GRI). 2014. Developing and Monitoring Indicators of Sustainable Development in Gyeonggi-Do. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: GRI.
  • Gyeonggi Research Institute(GRI). 2017a. A Preliminary Study on Implementation System of Gyeonggi-do’s SDGs. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: GRI.
  • Gyeonggi Research Institute(GRI). 2017b. A Preliminary Study on Analyzing the Dynamics of Quality of Life among the Residents of Gyeonggi-do. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: GRI.
  • Gyeonggi Research Institute(GRI). 2018. A Pilot Evaluation of Gyeonggi-do’s SDGs Indicators. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: GRI.
  • Gyeonggi-do Council for Sustainable Development. 2019. Ecological Footprint Monitoring for Gyeonggi-do. Gyeonggi-do, Korea: Gyeonggi-do Council for Sustainable Development.
  • Hege, E., D. Barchiche, J. Rochette, L. Chabason, and P. Barthélemy. 2019. Initial Assessment and Conditions for Success of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. IDDRI Study N°07/2019. Paris, France: Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations(IDDGI).
  • Josephsen, L. 2017. “Approaches to the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals – Some Considerations on the Theoretical Underpinnings of the 2030 Agenda.” Economics Discussion Paper 60. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2017-60
  • Katz, H., H. Anheier, and M. Lam. 2006. “Fuzzy Set Approaches to the Study of Global Civil Society.” Global Civil Society 7: 186–196.
  • Kok, M. T. J., and H. C. de Coninck. 2007. “Widening the Scope of Policies to Address Climate Change: Directions for Mainstreaming.” Environmental Science & Policy 10 (7–8): 587–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.003.
  • Korea Development Institute(KDI). 2018. Building Partnerships of SDGs Localization among Local Governments: The Case of Republic of Korea. Sejong, Korea: KDI.
  • Korea Environment Institute(KEI). 2017. Case Study and Promotion Plan for Implementation of SDGs by Local Governments. Sejong, Korea: KEI.
  • Korea, S. 2018. “2018 Gross Regional Domestic Product.” Accessed 3 February 2020 http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/13/2/index.board
  • Kvist, J. 1999. “Welfare Reform in the Nordic Countries in the 1990S: Using Fuzzy-Set Theory to Assess Conformity to Ideal Types.” Journal of European Social Policy 9 (3): 231–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879900900303.
  • Lafferty, W., and E. Hovden. 2003. “Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework.” Politics 12 (3): 1–22.
  • Lafortune, G., G. Fuller, G. Schmidt-Traub, and C. Kroll. 2020. “How Is Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals Measured? Comparing Four Approaches for the EU.” Sustainability 12 (18): 7675. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187675.
  • Le Blanc, D. 2015. “Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets.” DESA Working Paper No. 14. New York, US: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs(DESA).
  • Lee, K.-T., and K. Yong-Joo. 2010. “Measuring the Quality of Life - Focusing on Residents in Gyeonggi Province Case.” The Journal of Social Science 17 (1): 97–123.
  • Meuleman, L., and N. Ingeborg. 2015. “Common but Differentiated Governance: A Metagovernance Approach to Make the SDGs Work.” Sustainability 7 (9): 12295–12321. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912295.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2015. OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Germany 2015. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2016. Better Policies for Sustainable Development 2016: A New Framework for Policy Coherence. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2019a. Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2019: Empowering People and Ensuring Inclusiveness and Equality. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2019b. Governance as an SDG Accelerator: Country Experiences and Tools. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/0666b085-en.
  • Patole, M. 2018. “Localization of SDGs through Disaggregation of KPIs.” Economies 6 (15): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6010015.
  • Perić, N., M. M. Hofmarcher, and J. Simon. 2018. “Headline Indicators for Monitoring the Performance of Health Systems: Findings from the European Health Systems_Indicator(euHSI) Survey.” Archives of Public Health 76 (1): 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0278-0.
  • Pinter, L., P. Hardi, and P. Bartelmus. 2005. Sustainable Development Indicators: Proposals for a Way Forward. New York, US: International Institute for Sustainable Development(IISD).
  • Poku, N. K., and J. Whitman. 2011. “The Millennium Development Goals and Development after 2015.” Third World Quarterly 32 (1): 181–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.543823.
  • Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C., and P. Pennings. 2005. “Fuzzy Sets and Social Research.” Sociological Methods & Research 33 (4): 423–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124105274499.
  • Republic of Korea Ministry of Environment. 2016. A Study on the Role of Regional Governance for the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sejong, ROK: Local Sustainability Alliance of Korea(LSAK).
  • Schneider, C. Q., and I. Rohlfing. 2016. “Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-set QCA on Sufficiency: Formalizing Case Selection and Causal Inference.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (3): 526–568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114532446.
  • Spitz, G., E. van Ewijk, and R. Kamphof. 2016. “Global Goals, Local Action?: Approaches of Dutch Local Governments to the Sustainable Development Goals.” Kaleidos Research Discussion Paper 2. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kaleidos Research.
  • Sustainable Development Solutions Network(SDSN). 2015. Indicators and a Monitoring Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals: Launching a Data Revolution. Paris, France: SDSN.
  • Sustainable Development Solutions Network(SDSN). 2016. Getting Started with the SDGs in Cities: A Guide for Stakeholders. Paris, France: SDSN.
  • The UN Secretary General’s Independent Expert Advisory Group on the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development(IEAG). 2019. A World that Counts: Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development. New York, US: UN.
  • Timko, J., P. Le Billon, H. Zerriffi, J. Honey-rose´s, I. De La Roche, C. Gaston, T. C. H. Sunderland, and R. A. Kozak. 2018. “A Policy Nexus Approach to Forests and the SDGs: Tradeoffs and Synergies.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 34: 7–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.004.
  • Tosun, J., and J. Leininger. 2017. “Governing the Interlinkages between the Sustainable Development Goals: Approaches to Attain Policy Integration.” Global Challenges. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700036.
  • United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). 2018. Sustainable Cities Dialogue: Urban Governance at the Core of the Implementation of SDG 11. Barcelona, Spain: UCLG.
  • United Cities and Local Governments(UCLG). 2015. The Sustainable Development Goals What Local Governments Need to Know. Barcelona, Spain: UCLG.
  • United Nation(UN). 2016. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016. New York, US: UN.
  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs(UNDESA). 2013. Global Sustainable Development Report: Building the Common Future We Want. New York, US: UN.
  • United Nations Development Programme Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments(UNDP GTF). 2016. Roadmap for Localizing the SDGs: Implementation and Monitoring at Subnational Level. New York, US: UNDP.
  • United Nations Development Programme Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments(UNDP GTF). 2018. “Local and Regional Governments’ Report to the 2018 HLPF.” 2nd Report: Towards the Localization of the SDGs. New York, US: UNDP.
  • United Nations Development Programme(UNDP). 2016a. Transitioning from the MDGs to the SDGs. New York, US: UNDP.
  • United Nations Development Programme(UNDP). 2016b. Aligning Nationally Determined Contributions and Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons Learned and Practical Guidance. New York, US: UNDP.