Standing Up or Standing By? Middle School Students and Teachers Respond to Bullying: A Responsive Program Evaluation

References

• Abma, T. A. (2006). The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283189
   Google Scholar
• Banyard, V. (2013). Go big or go home: Reaching for a more integrated view of violence prevention. Psychology of Violence, 3, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032289
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70, 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039114
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C. P., O'Brennan, L. M., & Sawyer, A. L. (2008). Examining variation in attitudes toward aggressive retaliation and perceptions of safety among bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Professional School Counseling, 12(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0801200102
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36, 361–383.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Waasdorp, T., O'Brennan, L., & Gulemetova, M. (2013). Teachers' and education support professionals' perspectives on bullying and prevention: Findings from a National Education Association study. School Psychology Review, 42, 280–297.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, J., & Brayack, M. (2016). What makes a bystander stand by? Adolescents and bullying. Journal of School Violence, 15, 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2015.1079783
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, D., & Limber, S. P. (2015). Law and policy on the concept of bullying at school. American Psychologist, 70, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038558
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300211002
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C., Vaillancourt, T., Cunningham, L., Chen, Y., & Ratcliffe, J. (2011). Modeling the bullying prevention program design recommendations of students from grades five to eight: A discrete choice conjoint experiment. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20408
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. E., Rimas, H., Mielko, S., Mapp, C., Cunningham, L., Buchanan, D., … Marcus, M. (2016). What limits the effectiveness of antibullying programs? A thematic analysis of the perspective of teachers. Journal of School Violence, 15, 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2015.1095100
   Google Scholar
• Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., DeLooze, M., Roberts, C., & Barnekow, V. (2012). Social determinants of health and well being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2010). Systematic program evaluation: The foundation of program quality. In C. J. Sheperis, J. S. Young, & M. H. Daniels (Eds.), Counseling research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (pp. 173–186). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2014). The Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionniare (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15, 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801
   Google Scholar
• DeVoe, J. F., & Bauer, L. (2011). Student victimization in U.S. schools: Results from the 2009 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey ( NCES 2012–314). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. D., Erwin, E. H., Bettencourt, A., Mays, S., Vulin-Reynolds, M., & Sullivan, T. (2008). Individual factors influencing effective nonviolent behavior and fighting in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 297–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410801955821
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. D., Mehari, K. R., Kramer-Kuhn, A. M., Mays, S. A., & Sullivan, T. N. (2015). A qualitative analysis of factors influencing middle school students' use of skills taught by a violence prevention curriculum, Journal of School Psychology, 53, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Flerx, V. C., Limber, S. P., Mullin, N., Riese, J., Snyder, M., & Olweus, D. (2009). Class meetings that matter: A year's worth of resources for grades 6–8. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70, 293–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Kagan cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Constructivist knowing, participatory ethics, and responsive evaluation: A model for the 21st century. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 69–73). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, L., Slee, P. T., & Shute, R. H. (2000). “It hurts a hell of a lot …” The effects of indirect aggression on teenage girls. School Psychology International, 21, 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300214002
   Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention program effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2009). Handing qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, K., & Bauman, S. (2010). How school personnel tackle cases of bullying: A critical examination. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools (pp. 455–467). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., Schneider, B., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school anti-bullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 548–561.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1990). Responsive evaluation. In H. J. Walberg & G. D. Haertel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation (pp. 75–77). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, S., Allen Heath, M., Coyne, S., & Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers' perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21603
   Google Scholar
• StopBullying.gov. (n.d.). Facts about bullying. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.stopbullying.gov/media/facts/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2011). Analysis of state bullying laws and policies. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K., & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025408095553
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53, 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226
   Google Scholar