REFERENCES
- Bostrom , N. and Sandberg , A. 2006 . Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges Available at: http://www.nickbostrom.com/cognitive.pdf(accessed April 7, 2010)
- Capps , B. 2010 . Libertarianism, legitimation, and the problems of regulating cognition-enhancing drugs . Neuroethics , doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9059-3
- Gross , O. 1998 . “Once more unto the breach”: The systemic failure of applying the European Convention on Human Rights to entrenched emergencies . Yale Journal of International Law , 23 : 437 – 501 .
- Harris , J. 2009 . “ Enhancements are a moral obligation ” . In Human enhancement , Edited by: Savulescu , J. and Bostrom , N. 131 – 154 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
- Lucke , J. and Hall , W. 2010 . Begging the question: Presupposing that TMS can be shown to enhance eyewitness testimony . AJOB Neuroscience , 1 ( 3 ) : 34 – 35 .
- Olsen , J. and March , J. 2004 . The logic of appropriateness , Oslo : Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo . ARENA Working Paper Series: 09/2004
- Simmonds , N. 2002 . “ Rights at the cutting edge ” . In A debate over rights , Edited by: Kramer , M. , Simmonds , N. and Steiner , H. 113 – 232 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
- Tierney , S. 2005 . Determining the state of exception: What role for Parliament and the courts? . Modern Law Review , 68 : 668 – 672 .
- Vedder , A. and Klaming , L. 2010 . Human enhancement for the common good—Using neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory . AJOB Neuroscience , 1 ( 3 ) : 22 – 33 .