REFERENCES
- Decety, J., and J. M. Cowell. 2015. Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience 6(3): 3–14.
- Grant, A. M., and B. Schwartz. 2011. Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 61–76. doi:10.1177/1745691610393523
- Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (4): 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
- Harris, J. 2013. “Ethics is for bad guys!” Putting the “moral” into moral enhancement. Bioethics 27(3): 169–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01946.x
- Harris, J. 2011. Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 25(2): 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x
- Hughes, J. 2015. Moral enhancement requires multiple virtues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24(1): 86–95. doi:10.1017/S0963180114000334
- Jotterand, F. 2011. “Virtue engineering” and moral agency: Will post-humans still need the virtues? American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2(4): 3–9.
- Kahane, G., J. A. C. Everett, B. D. Earp, M. Farias, and J. Savulescu. 2015. ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition 134(1): 193–209. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005
- Paxton, J. M., L. Ungar, and J. D. Greene. 2012. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science 36(1): 163–177. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
- Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2010. Moral transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35(6): 656–669. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhq052
- Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2008. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(3): 162–177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x
- Poppa, T., and A. Bechara. 2015. A neural perspective of immoral behavior and psychotherapy. AJOB Neuroscience 6(3): 15–24.