REFERENCES
- Cabrera, L. Y., E. L. Evans, and R. H. Hamilton. 2014. Ethics of the electrified mind: Defining issues and perspectives on the principled use of brain stimulation in medical research and clinical care. Brain Topography 27(1): 33–45. doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0296-8.
- Craigie, J. 2011. Competence, practical rationality and what a patient values. Bioethics 25(6): 326–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01793.x.
- Foddy, B., and J. Savulescu. 2010. A liberal account of addiction. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 17(1): 1.
- Hope, T., J. Tan, A. Stewart, and R. Fitzpatrick. 2011. Anorexia nervosa and the language of authenticity. Hastings Center Report 41(6): 19–29.
- Hope, T., J. Tan, A. Stewart, and J. McMillan. 2013. Agency, ambivalence and authenticity: The many ways in which anorexia nervosa can affect autonomy. International Journal of Law in Context 9(01): 20–36.
- Maslen, H., J. Pugh, and J. Savulescu. 2015. The ethics of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Neuroethics, First online: 24 September 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9.
- Müller, S., R. Riedmüller, H. Walter, and M. Christen. 2015. An ethical evaluation of stereotactic neurosurgery for anorexia nervosa. AJOB Neuroscience 6(4): 50–65.
- Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
- Park, R. J., L. R. Godier, and F. A. Cowdrey. 2014. Hungry for reward: How can neuroscience inform the development of treatment for anorexia nervosa? Behaviour Research and Therapy 62: 47–59.
- Tan, J., A. Stewart, R. Fitzpatrick, and R. A. Hope. 2006. Competence to make treatment decisions in anorexia nervosa: Thinking processes and values. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 13(4): 267–282.