Advanced search
Publication Cover
AJOB Neuroscience Volume 8, 2017 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
92
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Moral Case Deliberation: Its Value for Neuroethics

S. MetselaarVU University Medical Center Amsterdam
,
G. MeynenVU University AmsterdamCorrespondence[email protected]
&
G. WiddershovenVU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Pages 23-25 | Published online: 22 Mar 2017

REFERENCES

  • Douglas, H. 2009. Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Emanuel, E. J., and L. Emanuel. 1992. Four models of the physician–patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 267:2221–26.
  • McClimans L., and A. Slowther. 2016. Moral expertise in the clinic: Lessons learned from medicine and science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):401–15.
  • Metselaar, S., B. Molewijk, and G. Widdershoven. 2015. Beyond recommendation and mediation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):50–51.
  • Molewijk, B., E. Zadelhoff, B. Lendemeijer, and G. Widdershoven. 2008. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: Improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Bioethica Forum 1 1:57–65.
  • Moses, T., and J. IIles. 2017. Ethics, ethicists, and professional organizations in the neurological sciences. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (1):3–11.
  • Parker, M. 2012. Moral craft. In M. Parker, ed. Ethical Problems and Genetics Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Bioethics and Law. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pearlman, R. A., M. B. Foglia, E. Fox, J. H. Cohen, B. L. Chanko, and K. A. Berkowitz. 2016. Ethics consultation quality assessment tool: A novel method for assessing the quality of ethics case consultations based on written records. American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):3–14.
  • Stolper, M., G. Widdershoven, and B. Molewijk. 2016. The dilemma method. A conversation method for moral case deliberation. BMC Medical Ethics 17:45.
  • Tarzian, A. J., and L. D. Wocial. 2015. A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: journey to the present and implications for the field. The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5):38–51.
  • Widdershoven, G., and S. Metselaar. 2012. Gadamer's truth and method and moral case deliberation in clinical ethics. In Hermeneutics and the humanities: Dialogues with Hans-Georg Gadamer, ed. M. Kasten, H. Paul, and R. Sneller, 287–305. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
  • Widdershoven, G., G. Meynen, L. Hartman, and D. Denys. 2014. Ethical dilemmas in the practice of DBS. American Journal of Bioethics—Neuroscience 5 (4) 83–85.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.