REFERENCES
- Birks, D., and A. Buy x. 2018. Punishing intentions and neurointerventions. AJOB Neuroscience 9(3):XX–XX.
- Garland, D. 2001. The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Greene, J., and J. Cohen. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359(1451): 1775–1785. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546.
- Haney, C. 2002. The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment, in From Prison to Home: The Effect of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families, and Communities, Conference: University of California, Santa Cruz.
- Hank, T. 2008. Greely, neuroscience and criminal justice: Not responsibility but treatment. U. Kan. L. Rev 1116
- Phelps, M. S. 2011. Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. Prison programs. Law & Society Review 45(1): 33–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00427.x
- Pustilnik, A. C. 2006. Prisons of the mind: Social value and economic inefficiency in the criminal justice response to mental illness. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95: 217.
- Tonry, M. 2004. Thinking about crime: sense and sensibility in American penal culture. New York: Oxford University Press.