References
- Alces, P. A. 2018. The Moral Conflict of Law and Neuroscience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Baum, M. L. 2013. The Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) genetic predisposition to impulsive violence: Is it relevant to criminal trials? Neuroethics 6(2): 287–306.
- Birks. D., and Buyx, A. 2018. Punishing intentions and neurointerventions. AJOB Neuroscience 9(3): XX–XX.
- Douglas, T. 2014. Criminal rehabilitation through medical intervention: Moral liability and the right to bodily integrity. The Journal of Ethics 18(2): 101–22.
- Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., Mangun, G. R. 2013. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind, 4th Edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Greene, J., and Cohen, J. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. In eds. S. Zeki, O.R. Goodenough, 207–226. Law and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lavazza, A. 2017. Neurolaw and punishment: A Naturalistic and Humanitarian view, and its overlooked perils. Teoria 37(2): 81–97.
- Lavazza, A. 2018. Freedom of thought and mental integrity: The moral requirements for any neural prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00082
- Pardo, M. S., and Patterson, D. 2014. Minds, Brains, and Law: The conceptual foundations of law and neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schaefer, G. O., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J. 2014. Autonomy and enhancement. Neuroethics 7(2): 123–136.