http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-2847
REFERENCES
- Birks, D., and A. Buyx. 2018. Punishing intentions and neurointerventions. AJOB Neuroscience 9(3): XX–XX.
- Boire, R. 2004. Neurocops: The politics of prohibtion and the future of enforcing social policy from inside the body. Journal of Law and Health 19(2): 215–257.
- Bublitz, C. 2015. Cognitive liberty or the international human right to freedom of thought. In: Clausen/Levy (eds.) Handbook of neuroethics. Springer, pp. 1309–1333.
- Bublitz, C. 2016. Moral enhancement and mental freedom. Journal of Applied Philosophy 33(1): 88–106.
- Bublitz, C. Forthcoming. Why means matter: Legally relevant differences between direct and indirect interventions into other minds. In: Vincent (ed). Regulating mental capacities. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fazel, S., and J. Danesh. 2002. Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet (London, England) 359(9306): 545–550.
- Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and punish. 2nd ed., New York: Random House.
- Genschow, O., T. Noll, M. Wänke, and R. Gersbach. 2015. Does baker-Miller Pink reduce aggression in prison detention cells? A critical empirical examination. Psychology, Crime and Law 21(5): 482–489.
- Paulo, N., and C. Bublitz. 2016. Pow(d)er to the people? voter manipulation, legitimacy, and the relevance of moral psychology for democratic theory. Neuroethics doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9266-7
- Sykes, G. M. 1958. The society of captives: a study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
- Walker, J., C. Illingworth, A. Canning, et al. 2014. Changes in mental state associated with prison environments: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 129(6): 427–436.