Advanced search
Publication Cover
AJOB Neuroscience Volume 9, 2018 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
77
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Vulnerability in Varying Contexts Affecting Decision Making in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Contemplating Deep Brain Stimulation: Implications for Clinicians

Robin MackenzieUniversity of KentCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 228-230 | Published online: 25 Feb 2019

References

  • Bell, E., P. Leger, T. Sankar, and E. Racine. 2016. Deep brain stimulation as clinical innovation: An ethical and organizational framework to sustain deliberations about psychiatric deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 79 (1): 3–10.
  • Bracken-Roche, D., E. Bell, M. Macdonald, and E. Racine. 2017. The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems 15(8): 1–18.
  • Desmoulin-Canselier, S. 2018. Patients’ lived experience with DBS between medical research and care: Some legal implications. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9859-5.
  • Lawrence, R. E., C. R. Kaufmann, R. B. DeSilva, and P. Appelbaum. 2019. Patients’ beliefs about deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. American Journal of Bioethics, Neuroscience 9(4): 210–218.
  • Mackenzie, R. 2016. Deep brain stimulation for psychopaths – a no brainer. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7(3): 137–9.
  • Mackenzie, R. 2014. Authenticity versus autonomy in choosing the new me: Beyond IEC and NIEC in DBS. American Journal of Bioethics – Neuroscience 5(1): 51–3.
  • Mackenzie, R. 2011a. Must family/carers look after strangers? Post-DBS identity changes and related conflicts of interest. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 7(12): 1–2. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00012.
  • Mackenzie, R. 2011b. Who should hold the remote for the new me? Cognitive, affective and behavioural side-effects of DBS and authentic choices over future personalities. American Journal of Bioethics 2(1): 18–19.
  • Mathews, D., J. Fins, and E. Racine. 2018. The therapeutic ‘mis’conception: an examination of its normative assumptions and a call for its revision. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27(1): 154–62.
  • Park, R., I. Singh, A. Pike, and J. Tan. 2017. Deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa: Hope for the hopeless or exploitation of the vulnerable? The oxford neuroethics gold standard framework. Frontiers in Psychiatry 8: 44.
  • Tokuda, T., J. Yoshimoto, Y. Shimizu, et al. 2018. Identification of depression subtypes and relevant brain regions using a data-driven approach. Scientific Reports 8: 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32521-z.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.