Ethical Issues to Consider Before Introducing Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Psychiatry

REFERENCES

• Aharoni, E., G. M. Vincent, C. L. Harenski, V. D. Calhoun, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, M. S. Gazzaniga, and K. A. Kiehl. 2013. Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(15): 6223–6228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219302110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S. 2007. Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 357(18): 1834–1840. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp074045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blitz, M. J. 2017. Searching minds by scanning brains. Neuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, M. A., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, A. Thibaut, G. Moonen, and S. Laureys. 2011. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: Recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. Journal of Neurology 258(7): 1373–1384. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6114-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claydon, L. 2017. Brain-based mind reading for lawyers: Reflecting on possibilities and perils. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4(3): 594–598. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demertzi, A., and S. Laureys. 2015. Detecting levels of consciousness. In Handbook of neuroethics, eds. J. Clausen and N. Levy, 665–677. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Drane, J. F. 1985. The many faces of competency. The Hastings Center Report 15(2): 17–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, K. and Sigman, M. 2013. Possibilities and limits of mind-reading: A neurophilosophical perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 22, 887–897.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, S., V. Coric, F. Fortunati, S. Southwick, H. Temporini, and C. A. Morgan. 2005. Malingering and forensic psychiatry. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 2(12): 25–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs, T. 2006. Ethical issues in neuroscience. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 19(6): 600–607. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000245752.75879.26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss, J., M. K. Auer, S. V. Biedermann, P. Briken, and W. Hacke. 2015. Deep brain stimulation to reduce sexual drive. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 40(3): 150003.
   Google Scholar
• Gutheil, T. G. 2005. Ethics and forensic psychiatry. In Psychiatric ethics, third edition, eds. S. Bloch, P. Chodoff, and S. A. Green, 345–361. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. A. 2005. The importance of trust for ethics, law, and public policy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14(2): 156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselager, P., R. Vlek, J. Hill, and F. Nijboer. 2009. A note on ethical aspects of BCI. Neural Networks 22(9): 1352–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmchen, H. 2015. Ethics in psychiatry. In Handbook of neuroethics, ed. J. Clausen and N. Levy, 873–878. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13(1): 5. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., L. Pan, V. L. Cherkassky, D. McMakin, C. Cha, M. K. Nock, and D. Brent. 2017. Machine learning of neural representations of suicide and emotion concepts identifies suicidal youth. Nature Human Behaviour 1(12): 911–919. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0234-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. D. 2012. Brain imaging in clinical psychiatry: Why? In I know what you're thinking: Brain imaging and mental privacy, ed. S. Richmond, G. Rees, and S. Edwards, eds. 111–121. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langleben, D. D., J. G. Hakun, D. Seelig, A. L. Wang, K. Ruparel, W. B. Bilker, and R. C. Gur. 2016. Polygraphy and functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection: A controlled blind comparison using. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 77(10): 1372–1380. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m09785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langleben, D. D., and J. C. Moriarty. 2013. Using brain imaging for lie detection: Where science, law and research policy collide. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 19(2): 222–234. doi: 10.1037/a0028841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, A., J. R. Foucher, D. Pins, et al. 2017. fMRI capture of auditory hallucinations: Validation of the two-steps method. Human Brain Mapping 38(10): 4966–4979. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, D. 2012. Overcoming self-report: Possibilities and limitations of brain imaging in psychiatry. In I know what you're thinking: Brain imaging and mental privacy, eds. S. Richmond, G. Rees, and S. Edwards, 123–135. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. A., and M. A. Just. 2016. Neural representations of physics concepts. Psychological Science 27(6): 904–913. doi: 10.1177/0956797616641941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattia, D., and G. Tamburrini. 2015. Ethical issues in brain–computer interface research and systems for motor control. In Handbook of neuroethics, eds. J. Clausen and N. Levy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. 2016. Legal insanity. Explorations in psychiatry, law, and ethics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. 2017. Brain-based mind reading in forensic psychiatry: Exploring possibilities and perils. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4(2): 311–329. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. 2018a. Author's Response to Peer Commentaries: Brain-based mind reading: Conceptual clarifications and legal applications. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 5(1): 212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. 2018b. Forensic psychiatry and neurolaw: Description, developments, and debates. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.04.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monti, M. M., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M. R. Coleman, M. Boly, J. D. Pickard, L. Tshibanda, A. M. Owen, and S. Laureys. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine 362(7): 579–589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T., and W. Sinnott-Armstrong. 2012. Neurolaw and neuroprediction: Potential promises and perils. Philosophy Compass 7(9): 631–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00494.x.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G. S., G. Richardson, A. S. David, G. Szmukler, P. Hayward, and M. Hotopf. 2008. Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: Cross sectional study. BMJ 337(jun30 1): a448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pardo, M. S., and D. Patterson. 2013. Minds, brains, and law. The conceptual foundations of law and neuroscience. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, C. A. 2017. Trust: The keystone of the patient-physician relationship. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 224(2): 95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, S., G. Rees, and S. J. L. Edwards. (Eds.) 2012. I know what you're thinking Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. W. 2016. A clinical guide to psychiatric ethics. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (Ed.) 2012. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., and R. P. Granacher. 2011. Conceptualization and assessment of malingering. In Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives, eds. E. Y. Drogin, F. M. Dattilio, R. L. Sadoff, and T. G. Gutheil. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roskies, A. L. 2015. Mind reading, lie detection, and privacy. In Handbook of neuroethics, eds. J. Clausen and N. Levy, 679–695. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rusconi, E., and T. Mitchener-Nissen. 2013. Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 594. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryberg, J. 2017. Neuroscience, mind reading and mental privacy. Res Publica 23(2): 197–211. doi: 10.1007/s11158-016-9343-0.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. X. 2013. Neuroscience, mental privacy, and the law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 36: 653–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. A. 2009. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 37(4): 489–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. J., and H. Ahn-Redding. 2006. The insanity defense, the world over. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Soekadar, S. R., N. Birbaumer, M. W. Slutzky, and L. G. Cohen. 2015. Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke. Neurobiology of Disease 83: 172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G., and P. S. Appelbaum. 2008. Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health 17(3): 233–244. doi: 10.1080/09638230802052203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Impelen, A., H. Merckelbach, M. Jelicic, and T. Merten. 2014. The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 28(8): 1336–1365. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.984763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpe, P. R., K. R. Foster, and D. D. Langleben. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 39–49. doi: 10.1080/15265160590923367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. 2014. Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yuste, R., S. Goering, B. A. y Arcas, et al. 2017. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature 551(7679): 159–163. doi: 10.1038/551159a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar