http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-9625
REFERENCES
- Colaneri, N., M. Sheldon, and A. Adesman. 2018. Pharmacological cognitive enhancement in pediatrics. Current Opinion Pediatric 30(3): 430–437. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000615.
- Conrad, E. C., and S. Humphries, A. Chatterjee. 2018. Attitudes toward cognitive enhancement: The role of metaphor and context. AJOB Neuroscience XX(XX): XX–XX.
- Ferioli, E., and M. Picozzi. 2018. Ethical implications of genetic susceptibility testing: NeuroGenEthics and the “Angelina Jolie effect”. Medicina Historica 2(3): 166–173.
- Gyngell, C., H. Bowman-Smart, and J. Savulescu. 2019. Moral reasons to edit the human genome: Picking up from the Nuffield report. Journal of Medical Ethics doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105084. Published Online First: 24 January 2019.
- Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Kirkham, G. 2006. Playing god and vexing nature: A cultural perspective. Environmental Values 15(2): 173–195. doi: 10.3197/096327106776678915.
- Reichlin, M. 2004. La nozione di responsabilità in bioetica. Teoria 1: 85–103.
- Sandel, M. J. 2007. The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, NY: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.