References
- Borg, J. S., C. Hynes, J. Van Horn, S. Grafton, and W. Sinnott-Armstrong. 2006. Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(5):803–817. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803.
- Conrad, E. C., S. Humphries, and A. Chatterjee. 2019. Attitudes toward cognitive enhancement: The reole of metaphor and context. AJOB Neuroscience 10(1): XX–XX.
- Cova, F., B. Strickland, A. Abatista, et al., in press. Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9.
- Nadelhoffer, T., and A. Feltz. 2008. The actor–observer bias and moral intuitions: Adding fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s fire. Neuroethics 1(2):133–144. doi: 10.1007/s12152-008-9015-7.
- Tassy, S., O. Oullier, J. Mancini, and B. Wicker. 2013. Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology 4:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250.
- Tassy, S., C. Deruelle, J. Mancini, S. Leistedt, and B. Wicker. 2013. High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:229. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229.
- Tassy, S., O. Oullier, Y. Duclos, et al. 2012. Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7(3):282–282. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr008.