91
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Abstracts

Selected Abstracts From the 2019 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting

REFERENCES

  • de Vel-Palumbo, M. , L. Howarth , and M. B. Brewer . 2019. Once a sex offender always a sex offender’? Essentialism and attitudes towards criminal justice policy. Psychology, Crime & Law 25(5):421–39.
  • Fortney, T. , J. Levenson , Y. Brannon , and J. N. Baker . 2007. Myths and facts about sexual offenders: Implications for treatment and public policy. Sexual Offender Treatment 2(1):1–17.
  • Galeste, M. A. , H. F. Fradella , and B. Vogel . 2012. Sex offender myths in print media: Separating fact from fiction in US newspapers. Western Criminology Review 13:4.
  • Haslam, N. 2011. Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine. Psychology Bulletin 137 (5): 819–824. doi:10.1037/a0022386
  • Reiner, P. B. 2011. The rise of neuroessentialism. In the Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J Illes & B Sahakian (Eds). Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128444.
  • Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35(1):21–23.
  • Schultz, W. 2018. Neuroessentialism: Theoretical and clinical considerations. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 58(6):607–39. doi:10.1177/0022167815617296.

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

  • Alpert, S. 2007. Brain privacy: How can we protect it? The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 7(9):70–3. doi:10.1080/15265160701518862
  • Bonaci, T. , R. Calo , and H. J. Chizeck . 2014. App stores for the brain: Privacy & security in brain-computer interfaces. IEEE , Chicago, IL, 2014, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893415.
  • Farah, M. J. 2011. Neuroscience and neuroethics in the 21st century. In J. Illes & B. J. Sahakian (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of neuroethics (p. 761–781). Oxford University Press.
  • PEW Research Center. 2014. Public perceptions of privacy and security in the Post-Snowden era. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/
  • Yuste, R. , S. Goering , and B. A. Y. Arcas , et al. 2017. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature News 551(7679):159–63. doi:10.1038/551159a

REFERENCES

  • Dubljević, V. , V. Saigle , and E. Racine . 2014. The rising tide of tDCS in the media and academic literature. Neuron 82(4):731–36.
  • Dubljević, V. 2015. Neurostimulation devices for cognitive enhancement: Toward a comprehensive regulatory framework. Neuroethics 8(2):115–26. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9225-0.
  • Dubljević, V. , and E. Racine . 2017. Moral enhancement meets normative and empirical reality: Assessing the practical feasibility of moral enhancement neurotechnologies. Bioethics 31(5):338–48.
  • Kim, T. D. , G. Hong , J. Kim , and S. Yoon . 2019. Cognitive enhancement in neurological and psychiatric disorders using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): A review of modalities, potential mechanisms and future implications. Experimental Neurobiology 28(1):1–16.
  • Luber, B. , and S. H. Lisanby . 2014. Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage 85(3):961–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.007

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

  • Białek, M. , S. Terbeck , and S. Handley . 2014. Cognitive psychological support for the ADC model of moral judgment. The American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience 5(4):21–23. doi:10.1080/21507740.2014.951790
  • Dubljević, V. , and E. Racine . 2014. The ADC of moral judgment: Opening the black box of moral intuitions with heuristics about agents, deeds and consequences. The American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience 5(4):3–20. doi:10.1080/21507740.2014.939381
  • Dubljević, V. , S. Sattler , and E. Racine . 2018. Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment. PLOS One 13(10):e0204631. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204631.
  • Schallenberger, M. 1894. Children’s rights. Pedagogical Seminary 3:87–96.
  • Turiel, E. 1983. The development of social knowledge . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

REFERENCE

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

  • Butcher, J. 2003. Cognitive enhancement raises ethical concerns. Academics urge pre-emptive debate on neurotechnologies. Lancet 362(9378):132–33.
  • Keshavan, M. S. , S. Vinogradov , J. Rumsey , J. Sherrill , and A. Wagner . 2014. Cognitive training in mental disorders: update and future directions. The American Journal of Psychiatry 171(5):510–22.
  • Rommelfanger, K. S. , S. J. Jeong , A. Ema , Global Neuroethics Summit Delegates, et al. 2018. Neuroethics questions to guide ethical research in the international brain initiatives. Neuron 100(1):19–36.

REFERENCES

  • Schabus, M. , H. Griessenberger , M. Gnjezda , D. P. Heib , M. Wislowska , and K. Hoedlmoser . 2017. Better than sham? A double-blind placebo-controlled neurofeedback study in primary insomnia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 140(4):1041–52. doi:10.1093/brain/awx011.
  • Thibault, R. T. , M. Lifshitz , and A. Raz . 2016. The self-regulating brain and neurofeedback: Experimental science and clinical promise. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 74:247–61. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.024.
  • Thibault, R. T. , M. Lifshitz , and A. Raz . 2017. Neurofeedback or neuroplacebo? Brain: A Journal of Neurology 140(4):862–64. doi:10.1093/brain/awx033
  • Wexler, A. 2019. Innovative practice outside of medical institutions. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 19(6):41–42. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1602182.

REFERENCES

  • Crenshaw, K. W. 2012. From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Reviews 59:1418–72.
  • Yancy, G. 2016. Black bodies, white gazes: The continuing significance of race in America . New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Lorde, A. 1984. The uses of anger: Women responding to racism. Sister Outsider 127:131.
  • Persson, I. , and J. Savulescu . 2012. Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Vol. 6. In Black is beautiful: A philosophy of black aesthetics , ed. Paul C. Taylor . Oxford: OUP.
  • Taylor, P. C. 2016. Black is beautiful: A philosophy of black aesthetics. Vol. 6. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.