Disentangling Function from Benefit: Participant Perspectives from an Early Feasibility Trial for a Novel Visual Cortical Prosthesis

REFERENCES

• Beauchamp, M. S., D. Oswalt, P. Sun, B. L. Foster, J. F. Magnotti, S. Niketeghad, N. Pouratian, W. H. Bosking, and D. Yoshor. 2020. Dynamic stimulation of visual cortex produces form vision in sighted and blind humans. Cell 181 (4):774–83.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, G. S., and W. S. Lewin. 1968. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology 196 (2):479–93. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. C., G. J. Suaning, J. W. Morley, and N. H. Lovell. 2009. Simulating prosthetic vision: I. Visual models of phosphenes. Vision Research 49 (12):1493–506. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dobelle, W. H. 2000. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO Journal 46 (1):3–9. doi:10.1097/00002480-200001000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobelle, W. H., and M. G. Mladejovsky. 1974. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. The Journal of Physiology 243 (2):553–76. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobelle, W. H., M. G. Mladejovsky, and J. P. Girvin. 1974. Artifical vision for the blind: Electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 183 (4123):440–4. doi:10.1126/science.183.4123.440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobelle, W. H., M. G. Mladejovsky, J. R. Evans, T. S. Roberts, and J. P. Girvin. 1976. Braille’ reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature 259 (5539):111–2. doi:10.1038/259111a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 2022. Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure. Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03810-5.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., D. Wendler, and C. Grady. 2000. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283 (20):2701–11. doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson-Davis, C., and H. Korzybska. 2021. What do blind people “see” with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users. PLoS One 16 (2):e0229189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, S. H., and F. Lotte. 2020. Grand challenges in neurotechnology and system neuroergonomics. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics 1. doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2020.602504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farnum, A., and G. Pelled. 2020. New vision for visual prostheses. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14:36. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. 2022. Early Feasibility Studies (EFS) Program. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Accessed May 24, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/investigational-device-exemption-ide/early-feasibility-studies-efs-program.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, O. 1929. Beitrage zur Pathophysiologie der Sehbahn und der Sehsphare [Contributions to the pathophysiology of the visual pathway and visual cortex]. Journal of Psychology and Neurology 39:463.
   Google Scholar
• Geruschat, D. R., M. Flax, N. Tanna, M. Bianchi, A. Fisher, M. Goldschmidt, L. Fisher, G. Dagnelie, J. Deremeik, A. Smith, et al. 2015. FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users. Clinical & Experimental Optometry 98 (4):342–7. doi:10.1111/cxo.12242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, S., C. Grady, K. Ramos, J. Fins, P. Ford, S. Goering, H. T. Greely, K. Hutchison, M. Kelly, S. Y. H. Kim, et al. 2019. Informed consent, and posttrial responsibilities in human research with neural devices: A review. JAMA Neurology 76 (12):1506–14. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE. 2020. Standards roadmap: Neurotechnologes for brain-machine interfacing.” IEEE SA Industry Connections Activity No. IC17-007.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, F. J., K. B. Nitsch, and P. Troyk. 2015. Participant perspectives from a cortical vision implant study: Ethical and psychological implications. Paper presented at the 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), Montpellier, France, April 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lázaro-Muñoz, G., M. T. Pham, K. Muñoz, K. Kostick-Quenet, C. E. Sanchez, L. Torgerson, J. Robinson, S. Pereira, S. Outram, B. A. Koenig, et al. 2022. Post-trial access in implanted neural device research: Device maintenance, abandonment, and cost. Brain Stimulation 15 (5):1029–36. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotte, F. 2016. Towards usable electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces. Bourdeaux, France: University of Bordeaux. https://hal.inria.fr/tel-01416980.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenstein, K., and M. Borchardt. 1918. Symptomatologie und elektrische Reizung bei einer Schußverletzung des Hinterhauptlappens [Symptomatology and electrical stimulation in a gunshot wound to the posterial parietal lobe]. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde 58 (3-6):264–92. doi:10.1007/BF01629694.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, A. J. 2013. Introducing the Monash vision group’s cortical prosthesis. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, September 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Niketeghad, S., and N. Pouratian. 2019. Brain machine interfaces for vision restoration: The current state of cortical visual prosthetics. Neurotherapeutics 16 (1):134–43. doi:10.1007/s13311-018-0660-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody Smith, A., L. Taiclet, H. Ebadi, L. Levy, M. Weber, E. M. Caruso, N. Pouratian, and A. Feinsinger. 2023. “They were already inside my head to begin with”: Trust, translational misconception, and intraoperative brain research. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (2):111–24. doi:10.1080/23294515.2022.2123869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pietrzykowski, T., and K. Smilowska. 2021. The reality of informed consent: Empirical studies on patient comprehension—systematic review. Trials 22 (1):57. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptito, M., M. Bleau, I. Djerourou, S. Paré, F. C. Schneider, and D.-R. Chebat. 2021. Brain-machine interfaces to assist the blind. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15:638887. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.638887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. M. 2022. The life worth living: Disability, pain, and morality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roest, B., M. Milota, and C. Leget. 2021. Developing new ways to listen: The value of narrative approaches in empirical (bio)ethics. BCM Medical Ethics 22 (1):124. doi:10.1186/s12910-02-00691-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. 2023. The bionic eye that could restore vision (and put humans in the matrix). CNET. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.cnet.com/science/biology/features/the-bionic-eye-that-could-restore-vision-and-put-humans-in-the-matrix/.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, E. M., M. J. Bak, F. T. Hambrecht, C. V. Kufta, D. K. O'Rourke, and P. Vallabhanath. 1996. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 119 (2):507–22. doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schönau, A., S. Goering, E. Versalovic, N. Montes, T. Brown, I. Dasgupta, and E. Klein. 2022. Asking questions that matter—Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:983226. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuder, M., A. Riccio, M. Risetti, S. Dähne, A. Ramsay, J. Williamson, D. Mattia, and M. Tangermann. 2013. User-centered design in brain–computer interfaces—A case study. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 59 (2):71–80. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2013.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramondo, J. A. 2019. The distinction between curative and assistive technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1125–45. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0058-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, E. 2011. Birth of the bionic eye: In 2012, electrodes will bring eyesight to the blind. IEEE Spectrum, December 30. Accessed June 28, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, E., and M. Harris. 2022. Their bionic eyes are now obsolete and unsupported. IEEE Spectrum, February 16. Accessed February 17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. 2016. Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. New York, NY: Routledge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troyk, P. R. 2017. The Intracortical Visual Prosthesis Project. In Artificial vision: A clinical guide, ed. V. P. Gabel, 203–214. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., R. Ajjawi, L. V. Monrouxe, B. C. O’Brien, and C. E. Rees. 2017. Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education 51 (1):40–50. doi:10.111/medu.13124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videosmith. 2020. Artificial vision (Ripley’s Believe It Or Not!): Interviews with Wiliam Dobelle and Jens Naumann [Video]. Youtube. December 5. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLIU6zfF_uc.
   Google Scholar
• Vollstedt, M., and S. Rezat. 2019. An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. In ICME-13 monographs, Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, eds. G. Kaiser and N. Presmeg, 81–100. Hamburg, Germany: SpringerOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, A., R. J. Choi, A. G. Ramayya, N. Sharma, B. J. McShane, L. Y. Buch, M. P. Donley-Fletcher, J. I. Gold, G. H. Baltuch, S. Goering, et al. 2022. Ethical issues in intraoperative neuroscience research: Assessing subjects’ recall of informed consent and motivations for participation. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (1):57–66. doi:10.1080/23294515.2021.1941415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia, Y., and Q. Ren. 2013. Ethical considerations for volunteer recruitment of visual prosthesis trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1099–106. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9375-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar