76
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Cognitive Enhancement Inevitably Leads to Discrimination against Women

ORCID Icon

REFERENCES

  • Dasgupta, J., G. Lockwood Estrin, J. Summers, and I. Singh. 2023. Cognitive enhancement and social mobility: Skepticism from India. AJOB Neuroscience 14 (4):341–351. doi:10.1080/21507740.2022.2048723.
  • Hoffman, G. A., and R. Bluhm. 2016. Neurosexism and neurofeminism. Philosophy Compass 11 (11):716–29. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12357.
  • Kramer, L., and A. Beutel. 2015. The sociology of gender: A brief introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Veit, W. 2018. Cognitive enhancement and the threat of inequality. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2 (4):404–10. doi:10.1007/s41465-018-0108-x.
  • Veit, W., and H. Browning. 2022. Feminism and enhancement. Preprint. Accessed September 08, 2023. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/21376.
  • Walsh, A. 2021. Distributive justice, equality and the enhancement of human cognition: A commentary on fairness and ‘cognitive doping’. The International Journal on Drug Policy 95:102874. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102874.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.