https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-5099
REFERENCES
- Bennett, C. L., E. Brady, and S. M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th international ACM sigaccess conference on computers and accessibility, pp. 161–173. doi:10.1145/3234695.3236348.
- Levy, L., H. Ebadi, A. Peabody Smith, L. Taiclet, N. Pouratian, and A. Feinsinger. 2023. Disentangling function from benefit: Participant perspectives from an early feasibility trial for a novel visual cortical prosthesis. AJOB Neuroscience 15 (3):158–176. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257152.
- Lukman, A. 2017. Developing design criteria based on visual perception of people with vision impairment using contrast cues. PhD diss. UNSW Sydney.
- Reynolds, J. M. 2022. The life worth living: Disability, pain, and morality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Shew, A. 2023. Against technoableism: Rethinking who needs improvement. New York: WW Norton & Company.
- Williams, M. A., C. Galbraith, S. K. Kane, and A. Hurst. 2014. “Just let the cane hit it.” How the blind and sighted see navigation differently. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility, pp. 217–224. 2014 doi:10.1145/2661334.2661380.