Neutrality, Enhancement Technology, and the Regulatory State

REFERENCES

• Basl , J. 2010 . State neutrality and the ethics of human enhancement technologies . American Journal of Bioethics , 1 ( 2 ) : 41 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• 1994 . Citizen Petition Regarding the FDA's Policy on Promotion of Unapproved Uses of Approved Drugs and Devices . Federal Register , 59 : 59820 – 59821 .
   Google Scholar
• Fox , D. 2010 . Taking sides on genetic modification . American Journal of Bioethics , 1 ( 2 ) : 41 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Greely , H. T. 2005 . “ The social consequences of advances in neuroscience: Legal problems; Legal perspectives ” . In Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice and policy , Edited by: Illes , J. Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Marneffe , P. de . 1989 . Liberalism, liberty, and neutrality . Philosophy and Public Affairs , : 253 – 274 .
   Google Scholar
• Larriviere , D. , Williams , M. A. , Rizzo , M. , Bonnie , R. J. and on behalf of the AAN Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee . 2009 . Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements: Guidance of the Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee . Neurology , 73 : 1406 – 1412 . E-pub Sept. 23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little , M. O. 1995 . “ Cosmetic surgery, suspect norms, and the ethics of complicity ” . In Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications , Edited by: Parens , Erik . 162 – 176 . Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ravelingien , A. , Braeckman , J. , Crevits , L. , De Ridder , D. and Mortier , E. 2009 . “Cosmetic neurology” and the moral complicity argument . Neuroethics , 2 : 151 – 162 .
   Google Scholar