Farm- and product-level biodiversity assessment of conventional and organic dairy production in Austria

References

• Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull AC. 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 42:261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin C, Baril A, Martin PA. 2008. Plant diversity in crop fields and woody hedgerows of organic and conventional farms in contrasting landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 123:185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schryver AM, Goedkoop MJ, Leuven RS, Huijbregts MA. 2010. Uncertainties in the application of the species area relationship for characterisation factors of land occupation in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 15:682–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. 1975. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview (IL): Longman Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2005. Agriculture and environment in EU-15 – the IRENA indicator report, EEA Report No 6/2005. Copenhagen : EEA.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller RJ, Norton LR, Feber RE, Johnson PJ, Chamberlain DE, Joys AC, Mathews F, Stuart RC, Townsend MC, Manley WJ, et al. 2005. Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxa. Biol Lett. 1:431–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RH, Pearce S, Morris RJ, Symondson WOC, Memmott J. 2007. Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm approach. J Appl Ecol. 44:792–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan A, Judge G, Miller D. 1996. Maximum entropy econometrics. Robust estimation with limited data Chichester. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hole DG, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD, Alexander IH, Grice PV, Evans AD. 2005. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv. 122:113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörtenhuber S, Lindenthal T, Amon B, Markut T, Kirner L, Zollitsch W. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from selected Austrian dairy production systems – model calculations considering the effects of land use change. Renew Agric Food Syst. 25: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2006a. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2006b. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanneret P, Baumgartner D, Freiermuth R, Gaillard G. 2006.  Méthode d’évaluation de l’impact des activités sur la biodiversité. Zürich: Agroscope Reckenholz Tänikon (ART).
   Google Scholar
• Jeanneret P, Baumgartner D, Freiermuth-Knuchel R, Gaillard G. 2008. A new LCIA method for assessing impacts of agricultural activities on biodiversity (SALCA-biodiversity). In: Nemecek T, Gaillard G, edtiors. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food-Chain; 2008 Nov 12–14. Zürich: Agroscope Reckenholz Tänikon (ART).
   Google Scholar
• Jenny M, Fischer J, Pfiffner L, Birrer S, Graf R. 2010. Leitfaden für die Anwendung des Punktesystems. Frick (Sempach): Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau (FiBL), Schweizerische Vogelwarte.
   Google Scholar
• Jenny M, Zellweger-Fischer J, Balmer O, Birrer S, Pfiffner L. 2013. The credit point system: an innovative approach to enhance biodiversity on farmland. Aspects Appl Biol. 118:23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lebensministerium. 2010. Evaluierungsbericht 2010. Wien: Halbzeitbewertung des Österreichischen Programms für die Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums.
   Google Scholar
• MA. 2005.  Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington (DC): Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mila i Canals L, Romanya J, Cowell S. 2007. Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod. 15:1426–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2001. Agriculture and biodiversity – developing indicators for policy analysis. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Paracchini ML, Petersen J-E, Hoogeveen Y, Bamps C, Burfield I, van Swaay C. 2008. High nature value farmland in Europe. An estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of land cover and biodiversity data. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, et al. 2009.  Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. [Internet]. [cited 2011 Oct 24]; 14. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY. 2009. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Schader C. 2009. Cost-effectiveness of organic farming for achieving environmental policy targets in Switzerland [PhD thesis]. Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales. Frick (Switzerland): Research Institute of Organic Farming (FiBL).
   Google Scholar
• Schader C, Lampkin N, Christie M, Nemecek T, Gaillard G, Stolze M. 2013. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of organic farming support as an agri-environmental measure at Swiss agricultural sector level. Land Use Policy. 31:196–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schader C, Stolze M. 2011.  Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit der biologischen Landwirtschaft in der Schweiz durch Experten. In: Leithold G, Becker K, Brock C, Fischinger S, Spiegel A-K, Spory K, Wilbois K-P, Williges U, edtiors. Proceedings of the 11 Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau; 2011 Mar 15–18; Gieβen.
   Google Scholar
• Schader C, Stolze M, Gattinger A. 2012. Environmental performance of organic agriculture. In: Boye JI, Arcand Y, editors. Green technologies in food production and processing. New York (NY): Springer; p. 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Schloter M, Dilly O, Munch J. 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 98:255–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brink P, Berghöfer A, Sröter-Schlaack C, Sukhdev P, Vakrou A, White S, Wittmer H. 2009. TEEB – the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
   Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan‐Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 8:857–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomisto H, Hodge I, Riordan P, Macdonald D. 2012. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European research. J Environ Manage. 112:309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Haaren C, Kempa D, Vogel K, Rüter S. 2012. Assessing biodiversity on the farm scale as basis for ecosystem service payments. J Environ Manage. 113:40–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurück zum Ursprung. 2013. Acht Grundwerte. Zurück zum Ursprung (ZZU) [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 13]. Available from: http://www.wernerlampert.com/pruef-nach/acht-grundwerte/
   Google Scholar