Editorial

References

• Alamgir M, Pert PL, Turton SM. 2014. A review of ecosystem services research in Australia reveals a gap in integrating climate change and impacts on ecosystem services. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:112–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ayanu YZ, Nguyen TT, Marohn C, Koellner T. 2011. Crop production versus surface-water regulation: assessing tradeoffs for land-use scenarios in the Tat Hamlet Watershed, Vietnam. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 7:231–244. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.634836.
   Google Scholar
• Banks JE, Hannon LM, Dietsch TV, Chandler M. 2014. Effects of seasonality and farm proximity to forest on Hymenoptera in Tarrazú coffee farms. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Busch M, Gee K, Burkhard B, Lange M, Stelljes N. 2011. Conceptualizing the link between marine ecosystem services and human well-being: the case of offshore wind farming. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 7:190–203. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.618465.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MSH, Koike M, Muhammed N, Halim MA, Saha N, Kobayashi H. 2009. Use of plants in healthcare: a traditional ethno-medicinal practice in rural areas of southeastern Bangladesh. Int J Biodivers Sci. 5:41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cochard R, Maneepitak S, Kumar P. 2014. Aquatic faunal abundance and diversity in relation to synthetic and natural pesticide applications in rice fields of Central Thailand. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanya B, Sathish BN, Viswanath S, Purushothaman S. 2014. Ecosystem services of native trees: experiences from two traditional agroforestry systems in Karnataka, Southern India. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Erb K-H, Haberl H, Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Müller D, Verburg PH, Reenberg A. 2013. A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity. Curr Opin Env Sust. 5:464–470. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti D. 2011. Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 7:143–149. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.617711.
   Google Scholar
• Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus MH, Arkema KK, Bernhardt JR, Guannel G, Kim C-K, Marsik M, Papenfus M, Toft JE, Verutes G, et al. 2012. Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 8:107–121. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.647835.
   Google Scholar
• Idohou R, Fandohan B, Salako VK, Kassa B, Gbèdomon RC, Yédomonhan H, Glèlè Kakaï RL, Assogbadjo AE. 2014. Biodiversity conservation in home gardens: traditional knowledge, use patterns and implications for management. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman S, Droogers P, Hunink J, Mwaniki B, Muchena F, Gicheru P, Bindraban P, Onduru D, Cleveringa R, Bouma J. 2014. Green Water Credits – exploring its potential to enhance ecosystem services by reducing soil erosion in the Upper Tana basin, Kenya. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 99:16812–16816. doi:10.1073/pnas.262413599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneepitak S, Cochard R. 2014. Uses, toxicity levels and environmental impacts of synthetic and natural pesticides in rice fields – a survey in Central Thailand. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 8:17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard S, James D, Davidson A. 2011. An adaptive participatory approach for developing an ecosystem services framework for south east Queensland, Australia. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 7:182–189. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.652176.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed N, Masum MFH, Hossain MM, Chakma S, Oesten G, von Detten R. 2011. Floral composition and biodiversity conservation in homestead forests in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 7:247–257. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.629211.
   Google Scholar
• Nandy S, Kumar Das A. 2013. Comparing tree diversity and population structure between a traditional agroforestry system and natural forests of Barak valley, northeast India. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 9:104–113. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.748691.
   Google Scholar
• Plant R, Ryan P. 2013. Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:44–53. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.737372.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill-Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, et al. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett. 11:499–515. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J. 2014. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:40–53. doi:10.1080/21513732.2014.884166.
   Google Scholar
• Sunil C, Somashekar RK, Nagaraja BC. 2011. Impact of anthropogenic disturbances on riparian forest ecology and ecosystem services in southern India. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 7:273–282. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.631939.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Erb K-H, Mertz O, Espindola G. 2013. Land system science: between global challenges and local realities. Curr Opin Env Sust. 5:433–437. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Haaren C, Albert C 2011. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 7:150–167. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.616534.
   Google Scholar