A comparison of the spatial variability of denitrification and related soil properties in restored and natural depression wetlands in Indiana, USA

References

• Anderson C, Mitsch W, Nairn R. 2005. Temporal and spatial development of surface soil conditions at two created riverine marshes. J Environ Qual. 34:2072–2081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho Y. 2006. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal. 38:5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachand P, Horne A. 1999. Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: II. Effects of vegetation and temperature. Ecol Eng. 14:17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantine K, Schneider R. 2009. Fifty-five years of soil development in restored freshwater depressional wetlands. Ecol Appl. 19:1467–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake G, Hartge K. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods: agronomy monograph no. 9. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; p. 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Bruland G, Hanchey M, Richardson C. 2003. Effects of agriculture and wetland restoration on hydrology, soils, and water quality of a Carolina bay complex. Wetl Ecol Manage. 11:141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruland G, Richardson C. 2004. A spatially explicit investigation of phosphorus sorption and related soil properties in two riparian wetlands. J Environ Qual. 33:785–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruland G, Richardson C. 2005. Spatial variability of soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 69:273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruland G, Richardson C, Daniels W. 2009. Microbial and geochemical responses to organic matter amendments in a created wetland. Wetlands. 29:1153–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruland G, Richardson C, Whalen S. 2006. Spatial variability of denitrification potential and related soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Wetlands. 26:1042–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgin A, Hamilton S. 2007. Have we overemphasized the role of denitrification in aquatic ecosystems? A review of nitrate removal pathways. Front Ecol the Environ. 5:89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke I, Lauenroth W, Riggle R, Brannen P, Madigan B, Beard S. 1999. Spatial variability of soil properties in the Shortgrass Steppe: the relative importance of topography, grazing, microsite, and plant species in controlling spatial patterns. Ecosystems. 2:422–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft C, Reader J, Sacco J, Broome S. 1999. Twenty-five years of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) marshes. Ecol Appl. 9:1405–1419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann L, Lawrence D, Okin G. 2007. Changes in the spatial variation of soil properties following shifting cultivation in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Biogeochemistry. 84:99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman J. 2009. IDRISI Taiga: guide to GIS and image processing. Worcester (MA): Clark Labs, Clark University.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema C, Coleman D, Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Rathbun S. 1998. Spatiotemporal distributions of bacterivorous nematodes and soil resources in a restored riparian wetland. Ecology. 79:2721–2734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettema C, Wardle D. 2002. Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennessy S, Craft C. 2011. Agricultural conservation practices increase wetland ecosystem services in the Glaciated Interior Plains. Ecol Appl. 21:S49–S64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo A. 2003. Spatial variability of soil properties in a floodplain forest in Northwest Spain. Ecosystems. 6:564–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis A, Ord J. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal. 24:189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittins R. 1968. Trend-surface analysis of ecological data. J Ecol. 56:845–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts P. 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils. 27:315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross K, Pregitzer K, Burton A. 1995. Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J Ecol. 83:357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald S, Reddy K, Newman S, DeBusk W. 2004. Spatial variability, distribution and uncertainty assessment of soil phosphorus in a south Florida wetland. Environmetrics. 15:811–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald S, Reddy K, Prenger J, Fisher M. 2007. Modeling of the spatial variability of biogeochemical soil properties in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecol Modell. 201:521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson G, Groffman P, Gold A. 1994. Denitrification in riparian wetlands receiving high and low groundwater nitrate inputs. J Environ Qual. 23:917–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms TK, Wentz EA, Grimm NB. 2009. Spatial heterogeneity of denitrification in semi-arid floodplains. Ecosystems. 12:129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges J, Stern J. 1984. Carbon and nitrogen determinations of carbonate-containing solids. Limnol Oceanogr. 29:657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopple A, Craft C. 2013. Managed disturbance enhances biodiversity of restored wetlands in the agricultural Midwest. Ecol Eng. 61:505–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter R, Faulkner S. 2001. Denitrification potentials in restored and natural bottomland hardwood wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 65:1865–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King R, Richardson C, Urban D, Romanowicz E. 2004. Spatial dependency of vegetation-environment linkages in an anthropogenically influenced wetland ecosystem. Ecosystems. 7:75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacic DA, Twait RM, Wallace MP, Bowling JM. 2006. Use of created wetlands to improve water quality in the Midwest-Lake Bloomington case study. Ecol Eng. 28:258–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Fortin M. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio. 80:107–138.
   Google Scholar
• Marton JM, Fennessy MS, Craft CC. 2014. Functional differences between natural and restored wetlands in the Glaciated Interior Plains. J Environ Qual. 43:409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain M, Boyer E, Dent C, Gergel S, Grimm N, Groffman P, Hart S, Harvey J, Johnston C, Mayorga E, et al. 2003. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems. 6:301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch W, Day J, Wendell Gilliam J, Groffman P, Hey D, Randall G, Wang N. 2001. Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi river basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience. 51:373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika. 37:17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvaney R. 1996. Nitrogen- inorganic forms. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part 3: chemical methods. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America; p. 1123–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Neff J, Harden J, Gleixner G. 2005. Fire effects on soil organic matter content, composition, and nutrients in boreal interior Alaska. Can J For Res. 35:2178–2187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr C, Stanley E, Wilson K, Finlay J. 2007. Effects of restoration and reflooding on soil denitrification in a leveed Midwestern floodplain. Ecol Appl. 17:2365–2376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr CH, Predick KI, Stanley EH, Rogers KL. 2014. Spatial autocorrelation of denitrification in a restored and a natural floodplain. Wetlands. 34:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne L, Kovacic D. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshw Biol. 29:243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta A, Matthews J, Kent A. 2010. Microbial community structure and denitrification in a wetland mitigation bank. Appl Environ Microbiol. 76:4207–4215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Scavia D. 2002. Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. BioScience. 52:129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotkin-Ellman M, Addy K, Gold A, Groffman P. 2004. Tree species, root decomposition and subsurface denitrification potential in riparian wetlands. Plant Soil. 263:335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger W, Raikes J, Hartley A, Cross A. 1996. On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology. 77:364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JT, McCarthy MJ, Gardner WS, Doyle RD. 2008. Denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, and nitrogen fixation along a nitrate concentration gradient in a created freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry. 87:99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedje J. 1994. Denitrifier enzyme activity. In: Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America; p. 256–257.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah S, Faulkner S. 2006. Denitrification potential of different land-use types in an agricultural watershed, lower Mississippi valley. Ecol Eng. 28:131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens J. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol. 3:385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltemade C. 2000. Ability of restored wetlands to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in agricultural drainage water. J Soil Water Conserv. 55:303–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedler JB. 2003. Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front Ecol Environ. 1:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar