Process matters: a framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Amer Stat Assoc. 105:493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcamo J. 2008. Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Chapter 6, The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 123–148.
   Google Scholar
• Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM. 2013. The effects of protected area systems on ecosystem restoration: a quasi-experimental design to estimate the impact of Costa Rica’s protected area system on forest regrowth. Cons Lett. 6:317–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino JA. 2008. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 105:16089–16094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkema KK, Guannel G, Verutes G, Wood SA, Guerry A, Ruckelshaus M, Kareiva P, Lacayo M, Silver JM. 2013. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nat Clim Change. 3:913–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkema KK, Verutes G, Wood SA, Clarke C, Rosado S, Canto M, Rosenthal A, Ruckelshaus M, Guannel G, Toft J, et al. Forthcoming. Improving the margins: modeling ecosystem services leads to better coastal plans. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beierle TC, Konisky DM. 2001. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Env Plan C. 19:515–527.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagabati N, Ricketts T, Sulistyawan TBS, Conte M, Ennaanay D, Hadian O, McKenzie E, Olwero N, Rosenthal A, Tallis H, Wolny S. 2014. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans. Biol Cons. 169:147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagabati NK, Barano T, Conte M, Ennaanay D, Hadian O, McKenzie E, Olwero N, Rosenthal A, Suparmoko SA, Shapiro A, et al. 2012. A green vision for Sumatra: using ecosystem services information to make recommendations for sustainable land use planning at the province and district level. Washington (DC): The Natural Capital Project, WWF-US and WWF-International.
   Google Scholar
• Braat LC, de Groot R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosys Serv. 1:4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 486: 59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ. 2006. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs. Science. 314:257–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 106: 1305–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 100:8086–8091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark Labs. 2009. The Land Change Modeler for ecological sustainability [Internet]. IDRISI Focus Paper. Worcester (MA): Clark Labs. Available from: http://clarklabs.org/applications/upload/Land-Change-Modeler-IDRISI-Focus-Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke C, Canto M, Rosado S. 2013. Belize integrated Coastal Zone management plan. Belize City: Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute; p. 423.
   Google Scholar
• Cosslett CE, van Paddenburg A, editors. 2012. Heart of Borneo: investing in nature for a green economy. A synthesis report. Jakarta: WWF Heart of Borneo Global Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Env. 7:21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM. 2014. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 111:4332–4337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM, Sims KRE. 2011. Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 108:13913–13918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309: 570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Benner RL, Benitez S, Boucher T, Calvache A, Daily G, Kareiva P, Kroeger T, Ramos A. 2012. Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx. 46:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Benner RL, Benitez S, Calvache A, Ramos A, Veiga F. 2013. Water funds: a new ecosystem service and biodiversity conservation strategy. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. 2nd ed. Vol. 7. Cambridge: Elsevier; p. 352–366.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 109:7565–7570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus MH, Arkema KK, Bernhardt JR, Guannel G, Kim CK, Marsik M, Papenfus M, Toft JE, Verutes G, et al. 2012. Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosys Serv Manag. 8: 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES [Internet]. c2014. Bonn: intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. [cited 2014 Apr 27] Available from: http://www.ipbes.net/
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston (MA): Addison Wesley Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Knight A, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM. 2008. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Cons Bio. 22:610–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L. 2013. Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manag. 119:208–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald DH, Bark RH, Coggan A. 2014. Is ecosystem service research used by decision-makers? A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Land Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0021-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillman P, Bernhardt J, Howard K, Rosenthal A. 2014. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environ Plan C. 32. doi:10.1068/c12292j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie E, Rosenthal A, Bernhardt J, Girvetz E, Kovacs K, Olwero N, Toft J. 2012. Developing scenarios to assess ecosystem service tradeoffs: guidance and case studies for InVEST users. Washington (DC): World Wildlife Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: the assessment series. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myint SW, Wang L. 2006. Multicriteria decision approach for land use land cover change using Markov chain analysis and a cellular automata approach. Can J Rem Sens. 32:390–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neßhöver C, Timaeus J, Wittmer H, Krieg A, Geamana N, van den Hove S, Young J, Watt A. 2013. Improving the science-policy interface of biodiversity research projects. GAIA. 22:99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Reid RS, Nkedianye D, Said MY, Kaelo D, Neselle M, Makui O, Onetu L, Kiruswa S, Ole Kamuaro N, Kristjanson P, et al. 2009. Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900313106
   Google Scholar
• Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, Guerry A, Daily G, Kareiva P, Polasky S, Ricketts R, Bhagabati N, Wood S, et al. 2013. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier PA. 2007. Theories of the policy process. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seppelt R, Dormann C, Eppink F, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 48:630–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, Fisher JL, Grêt-Regamey A, Lautenbach S, Pert P, Hotes S, Spangenberg J, Verburg PH, et al. 2012. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol Indic. 21: 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, et al. 2014. InVEST user’s guide. Stanford: the Natural Capital Project [Internet]. Available from: http://ncp-dev.stanford.edu/~dataportal/invest-releases/documentation/current_release/
   Google Scholar
• Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1162:265–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis H, Wolny S, Lozano JS. 2011. Including ecosystem services in mitigation [Internet]. Report to the Colombian Ministry of Environment, Mines and Territorial Development. Stanford (CA): Natural Capital Project, Stanford University. Available from: http://naturalcapitalproject.org/pubs/Colombia_Mitigation_Report_Final_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2014. Geneva: The Economic of Ecosystems and Biodiversity [Internet]. [cited 2014 April 27]. Available from: http://www.teebweb.org/
   Google Scholar
• Verutes G, Arkema KK, Rosenthal A, Clarke C, Wood S, Canto M, Rosado S, Ruckelshaus M, Guerry A. In prep. Applying ecosystem service science to policy for marine spatial planning.
   Google Scholar
• Vihervaara P, Rönkä M, Walls M. 2010. Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. AMBIO. 39:314–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl AL, Tallis H, Douglass J, Sharp R, Veiga F, Benitez S, León J, Game E, Petry E, Guimarães J, Lozano JS. 2013. Resource Investment Optimization System: introduction & theoretical documentation [Internet]. Stanford (CA): Natural Capital Project, Stanford University. Available from: http://ncp-dev.stanford.edu/~dataportal/rios_releases/RIOSGuide_Combined_8-22-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vogl AL, Tallis H, Wolny S, Sharp R, Veiga F, Benitez S, León J, Lozano JS, Petry P, Game E, et al. In prep. Investing in watershed services: combining biophysical, economic, and social data to identify cost-effective investment strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Vogl AL, Wolny S, Hamel P, Johnson J, Rogers M, Dennedy-Frank PJ 2014. Valuation of hydropower services. Report prepared for the World Bank. Stanford (CA): The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Wood SA, Guerry AD, Silver JM, Lacayo M. 2013. Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Sci Rep. 3:2976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar