Urban wetland parks in Finland: improving water quality and creating endangered habitats

References

• Arheimer B, Wittgren HB. 2002. Modelling nitrogen removal in potential wetlands at the catchment scale. Ecol Eng. 19:63–80. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Warford CM, Zedler JB. 2002. Potential for using native plant species in stormwater wetlands. Environ Manage. 29:385–394. doi:10.1007/s00267-001-0032-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braskerud B. 2002. Factors affecting phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecol Eng. 19:41–61. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson FH, Holland D. 1999. The distribution in bankside habitats of three alien invasive plants in the U.K. in relation to the development of control strategies. Hydrobiologia. 415:193–201. doi:10.1023/A:1003872325274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmberg J, Nummi P, Poysa H, Sjoberg K. 1993. Factors affecting species number and density of dabbling duck guilds in North Europe. Ecography. 16:251–260. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1993.tb00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K. 1992. Do intruding predators and trap position affect the reliability of catches in activity traps? Hydrobiologia. 239:187–193. doi:10.1007/BF00007676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson L-A, Brönmark C, Anders Nilsson P, Åbjörnsson K. 2005. Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freswat Biol. 50:705–714. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä K, Tuomenvirta H, Ruosteenoja K. 2004. Climate change projections for Finland during the 21st century. Bor Env Res. 9:127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantrud HA, Stewart RE. 1977. Use of natural basin wetlands by breeding waterfowl in North Dakota. J Wildl Manage. 41:243–253. doi:10.2307/3800601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppinen J, Koskimies P, Väisänen RA. 1991. Waterfowl round count. In: Koskimies P, Väisänen RA, editors. Monitoring bird populations. Helsinki (Finland): Zoological Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History; p. 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Koskiaho J 2006. Retention performance and hydraulic design of constructed wetlands treating runoff waters from arable land [ dissertation]. Acta Univ Oulu Ser C Technica 252. Oulu (Finland): University of Oulu.
   Google Scholar
• Kovats RS, Valentini R, Bouwer LM, Georgopoulou E, Jacob D, Martin E, Rounsevell M, Soussana JF. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Bili TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, et al., editors. Contribution of working group ii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 1267–1326.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Wu F, Lu Y, Xiang C, Zhang P, Jin C. 2009. Phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff by constructed wetland. Ecol Eng. 35:402–409. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag. 8:17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
   Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Altor AE, Hernández ME. 2005. Creating riverine wetlands: ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects. Ecol Eng. 25:510–527. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Lane RR. 2005. Nitrate-nitrogen retention in wetlands in the Mississippi river basin. Ecol Eng. 24:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Marois D, Song K. 2014. Protecting the Florida Everglades wetlands with wetlands: can stormwater phosphorus be reduced to oligotrophic conditions? Ecol Eng. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen M, Kaila A, Koskinen M, Sarkkola S, Fritze H, Tuittila E-S, Nousiainen H, Koivusalo H, Laurén A, Ilvesniemi H, et al. 2014. Natural and restored wetland buffers in reducing sediment and nutrient export from forested catchments: Finnish experiences. In: Vymazal J, editor. The role of natural and constructed wetlands in nutrient cycling and retention on the landscape. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nummi P, Hahtola A. 2008. The beaver as an ecosystem engineer facilitates teal breeding. Ecography. 31:519–524. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummi P, Holopainen S. 2014. Whole-community facilitation by beaver: ecosystem engineer increases waterbird diversity. Aquat Conserv: Mar and Freshwater Ecosyst. 24:623–633. doi:10.1002/aqc.2437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummi P, Kattainen S, Ulander P, Hahtola A. 2011. Bats benefit from beavers: a facilitative link between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Biodivers Conserv. 20:851–859. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9986-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummi P, Väänänen V-M, Rask M, Nyberg K, Taskinen K. 2012. Competitive effects of fish in structurally simple habitats: perch, invertebrates, and goldeneye in small boreal lakes. Aquat Sci. 74:343–350. doi:10.1007/s00027-011-0225-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe A, Piehler M, Thompson S, Paerl H. 2003. Denitrification in a constructed wetland receiving agricultural runoff. Wetlands. 23:817–826. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0817:DIACWR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen M, Koskiaho J, Jormola J, Järvenpää J, Karhunen A, Mikkola-Roos M, Pitkänen J, Riihimäki J, Svensberg M, Vikberg P. 2007. Maatalouden monivaikutteisten kosteikkojen suunnittelu ja mitoitus [Multipurpose wetlands for agricultural water protection – guidelines of wetland planning and dimensioning]. The Finnish Environment 21/2007. Helsinki (Finland): Finnish Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio A, Schulman A, Kontula T, editors. 2008. Suomen luontotyyppien uhanalaisuus – Osa 1: tulokset ja arvioinnin perusteet [Assessment of threatened habitat types in Finland – Part 1: results and basis for assessment]. Suomen ympäristö 8/2008. Helsinki (Finland): Suomen ympäristökeskus. 264 s.
   Google Scholar
• Read J, Wevill T, Fletcher T, Deletic A. 2008. Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Res. 42:893–902. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen AJ, Tiirola M, Hietanen S, Ojala A. 2013. Interlake variation and environmental controls of denitrification across different geographical scales. Aquat Microb Ecol. 69:1–16. doi:10.3354/ame01619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen AJ, Tiirola M, Ojala A. 2011. Spatial and temporal variation in denitrification and in the denitrifier community in a boreal lake. Aquat Microb Ecol. 64:27–40. doi:10.3354/ame01506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen O, Ahponen H, Valkama P, Vessman T, Rantakokko K, Vaahtera E, Taylor A, Vasander H, Nikinmaa E. 2012. Benefits of green infrastructure – socioeconomic importance of constructed urban wetlands (Nummela, Finland). In: Kettunen M, Vihervaara P, Kinnunen S, D’Amato D, Badura T, Argimon M, Ten Brink P, editors. Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries – Synthesis in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; p. 247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen V-P, Varjo E. 2000. Vihdin Enäjärven kunnostuksen vaikutus pohjasedimentin ominaisuuksiin [The effects of restoration actions at the Lake Enäjärvi in Vihti, Finland on bottom sediment characteristics]. Geologi. 52:159–163. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Stottmeister U, Wießner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kästner M, Bederski O, Müller RA, Moormann H. 2003. Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv. 22:93–117. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2003.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner CC. 1996. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems — A comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecol Eng. 7:59–83. doi:10.1016/0925-8574(95)00066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis O, Sirvio H, Kettunen J. 1989. Multivariate analysis of lake phytoplankton and environmental factors. Arch Hydrobiol. 117:163–175.
   Google Scholar
• Vehkaoja M, Nummi P. Forthcoming 2015. Beaver facilitation in the conservation of boreal anuran communities. Herpetozoa. 28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohla C, Alas R, Nurk K, Baatz S, Mander Ü. 2007. Dynamics of phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon removal in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Sci Total Environ. 380:66–74. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS. 2002. An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia. 132:96–101. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedler JB, Leach MK. 1998. Managing urban wetlands for multiple use: research, restoration, and recreation. Urban Ecosyst. 2:189–204. doi:10.1023/A:1009528505009
   Google Scholar