Relation between forest stand diversity and anticipated log quality in managed Central European forests

References

• Baroni-Urbani C, Buser MW. 1976. Similarity of binary data. Syst Zool. 25:251–259.
   Google Scholar
• Belote RT, Prisley S, Jones RH, Fitzpatrick M, de Beurs K. 2011. Forest productivity and tree diversity relationships depend on ecological context within mid-Atlantic and Appalachian forests (USA). For Ecol Manage. 261:1315–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneter A, Bauhus J. 2014. Effects of tree species diversity on stem quality: plot and tree level results from six European regions. Int For Rev. 16:141. ISSN: 1465-5498 (print), 2053-7778 (online).
   Google Scholar
• Berger WH, Parker FL. 1970. Diversity of planktonic Foraminifera in deep sea sediments. Science. 168:1345–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce R. 2003. Choosing the best similarity index when performing fuzzy set ordination on abundance data. Poster Session 2: Statistical Ecology and Ecological Modeling.ESA annual Meeting. [cited 2015 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.nku.edu/~boycer/ESA03b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bray JR, Curtis JT. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 27:325–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillouin L. 1956. Science and information theory. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruciamacchie M. 1996. Comparison between indices of species diversity. Munich. 3/96:14.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinale BJ, Wright JP, Cadotte MW, Carroll IT, Hector A, Srivastava DS, Loreau M, Weis JJ. 2007. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:18123–18128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomes DA, Flores O, Holdaway R, Jucker T, Lines ER, Vanderwel MC. 2014. Wood production response to climate change will depend critically on forest composition and structure. Glob Chang Biol. 20:3632–3645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czekanowski J. 1909. Zur differential Diagnose der Neandertalgruppe. Korrespondenz-Blatt Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Anthropologie. 40:44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Danilović M. 2008. Assessment of the effect of quality factors on the assortment structure in poplar plantations. Bull Fac For. 97:127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Danilović M. 2006. Effect of quality factors especially of sweep of poplar trees on assortment structure. Glasnik Schumarskog fakulteta. Beograd BIBLID. 94:135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Research Agency. 2015. [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/glossary
   Google Scholar
• Fox TR, Haas CA, Smith DW, Loftis DL, Zedaker SM, Jones RH, Hammett AL. 2006. Alternative silvicultural practices in appalachian forest ecosystems: implications for species diversity, ecosystem resilience, and commercial timber production. In: Buckley DS, Clatterbuck WK, editors. Proceedings of 15th Central Hardwood Forest Conference held at the University of Tennessee; February 27 – March 1, 2006. Asheville (NC): U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station; p. 276–280.
   Google Scholar
• Gadow K. 1999. Waldstruktur und Diverzität. Afjz. 170:117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Gadow K, Hui G. 1999. Modelling forest development. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gschwantner T, Schadauer K, Vidal C, Lanz A, Tomppo E, Di Cosmo L, Robert N, Englert Duursma D, Lawrence M. 2009. Common tree definitions for national forest inventories in Europe. Silva Fennica. 43:303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldin JM, Fitzpatrick MW. 1991. Comparison of log quality from even-aged and uneven-aged Loblolly pine stands in south Arkansas. South J App For. 15:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Heip C. 1974. A new index measuring evenness. J Marine Biol Assoc. 54:555–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology. 54:427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey JW, Watts K. 2004. Biodiversity indicators for UK managed forests: development and implementation at different spatial scales. EFI-Proceedings. 51:79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Avacaritei D, Dănilă I, Duduman G, Valladares F, Coomes DA. 2014. Competition for light and water play contrasting roles in driving diversity-productivity relationships in Iberian forests. J Ecol. 102:1202–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Coomes DA. 2015. Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests. Funct Ecol. 29:1078–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kint V, Lust N, Ferris R, Olsthoorn AFM. 2000. Quantification of forest stand structure applied to scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). forests. Invest Agr: Sist Recur For: Fuera de Serie. 1:17.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Ammer C, Stimm B, Mosandl R. 2008. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J Forest Res. 127:89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs CJ. 1989. Ecological methodology. New York (NY): Harper and Row; 471 p.
   Google Scholar
• Krejzar T, Bělská M, Bezděčková L, Bílý J, Buchta N, Činka M, Daňhelka M, Dvořák P, Fabiánek P, Hána J, et al. 2015. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2014. Report on the State of Forests and Forestry in the Czech Republic. Ministerstvo zemědělství Praha. [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: http://www.uhul.cz/ke-stazeni/informace-o-lese/zelene-zpravy-mze.
   Google Scholar
• Lance GN, Williams WT. 1966. Computer programs for hierarchical polythetic classification (“similarity analysis”). Computer J. 9:60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei X, Wang W, Peng C. 2009. Relationships between stand growth and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forests in New Brunswick, Canada. Can J For Res. 39:1835–1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Buongiorno J, Monserud RA. 2007. Optimizing wood quality and stand diversity in uneven-aged forest management. In: Dykstra DP, Monserud RA, editors. Forest Growth and Timber Quality: Crown Models and Simulation Methods for Sustainable Forest Management. Proceedings of an International Conference, 2007 Aug 7–10; Portland, OR. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-791. Portland (OR): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; p. 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Long JN, Shaw JD. 2010. The influence of compositional and structural diversity on forest productivity. Forestry. 83:121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. 1988. Statistical ecology a primer on methods and computing. New York (NY): John Willey & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald E, Gardiner B, Mason W. 2010. The effects of transformation of even-aged stands to continuous cover forestry on conifer log quality and wood properties in the UK. Forestry. 83:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Margalef R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen Systematics. 3:36–71.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt DW. 1970. Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics. 12:591–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh RP. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology. 48:392–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menhinick EF. 1964. A comparison of some species – individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology. 45:859–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merganič J, Marušák R, Merganičová K, Tipmann L, Stolariková R, Audolenská V. 2012. Sampling design for integrated noncash and economic valuation of biodiversity – case study. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica. 43:145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Merganič J, Merganičová K, Marušák R, Audolenská V. 2012. Plant diversity of forests. In: Blanco JA, Lo YH, editors. 2012: Forest Ecosystems - More than Just Trees. InTech publisher; 464 p. p. 3–28. ISBN: 978-953-51-0202-1. [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/forest-ecosystems-more-than-just-trees.
   Google Scholar
• Morin X, Fahse L, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bugmann H. 2011. Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol Lett. 14:1211–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann M, Starlinger F. 2001. The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. For Ecol Manage. 145:91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss RF. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biol. 4:355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. 2015. [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: http://findwords.info/term/assortment.
   Google Scholar
• Petráš R, Nociar V. 1990. Nové sortimentačné tabuľky hlavných listnatých drevín. Lesnícky Časopis. 36:535–552.
   Google Scholar
• Petráš R, Nociar V. 1991. Nové sortimentačné tabuľky hlavných ihličnatých drevín. Lesnícky Časopis. 37:377–392.
   Google Scholar
• Petráš R, Pajtík J. 1991. Sústava česko-slovenských objemových tabuliek drevín. Lesnícky Časopis. 37:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. 1977. Mathematical ecology. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Plíva K. 1987. Typologický klasifikační systém ÚHÚL. Brandýs nad Labem: ÚHÚL.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2005. Diversity and productivity in forests: evidence from long-term experimental plots. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze ED, editors. Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Berlin (Germany): Springer; p. 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2009. Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2014. Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manage. 327:251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prka M. 2012. Impact of sustainable management of natural even-aged beech stands on assortment structure of beech in Croatia. In: Oteng-Amoako, AA, editor. New Advances and Contributions to Forestry Research. InTech. [cited 2015 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-advances-and-contributions-to-forestry-research/impact-of-sustainablemanagement-of-natural-even-aged-beech-stands-on-assortment-structure-of-beech.
   Google Scholar
• Prka M, Krpan APB. 2010. Impact of tending measures on assortment structure of fellings in central Croatian beech stands. Acta Silv Lign Hung. 6:171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon C, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 163:688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šmelko Š. 2007. Dendrometria. Zvolen: Vydavateľstvo TU Zvolen.
   Google Scholar
• Šmelko Š. 2010. New methodical procedures for the quantification of deadwood and its components in forest ecosystems. Lesn Čas – Forestry J. 56:155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter/Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. 5:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Suchomel J, Gejdoš M, Ambrušová L, Šulek R. 2012. Analysis of price changes of selected roundwood assortments in some Central Europe countries. J For Sci. 58:483–491.
   Google Scholar
• ÚHÚL. 2007. National forest inventory in the Czech Republic 2001–2004. Introduction, methods, results. Brandýs nad Labem: ÚHÚL.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Lei X, Ma Z, Kneeshaw DD, Peng C. 2011. Positive relationship between aboveground carbon stocks and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forest stands in New Brunswick, Canada. For Sci. 57:506–515.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall C, Williams MS. 2005. Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator of the FIA program. General-Technical-Report-North-Central-Research-Station,-USDA-Forest-Service. (NC-256). Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatník A. 1976. Lesnická fytocenologie. Praha: SZN.
   Google Scholar