Advancing science on the multiple connections between biodiversity, ecosystems and people

References

• De Groot R, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, Haines-Young R, Gowdy J, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S, et al. 2010. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In  Kumar, P, editor: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan; p. 9–40.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot RS. 1987. Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology and economics. Environmentalist. 7:105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, et al. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework — connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 14:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, et al. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359:270–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria C, Mollett S. 2016. Critical feminist reflexivity and the politics of whiteness in the ‘field’. Gender, Place & Culture. 23:79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Dyball R, Fazey I, Gross C, Dovers S, Ehrlich PR, Brulle RJ, Christensen C, Borden RJ. 2012. Human behavior and sustainability. Front Ecol Environ. 10:153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galafassi D, Kagan S, Milkoreit M, Heras M, Bilodeau C, Bourke SJ, Merrie A, Guerrero L, Pétursdóttir G, Tàbara JD. 2018. ‘Raising the temperature’: the arts on a warming planet. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 31:71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Rodrigues J, Villasante S, Drakou EG, Kermagoret C, Beaumont N. 2017. Operationalising marine and coastal ecosystem services. Int J Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Serv Manag. 13:i–iv.
   Google Scholar
• Haider LJ, Hentati-Sundberg J, Giusti M, Goodness J, Hamann M, Masterson VA, Meacham M, Merrie A, Ospina D, Schill C, et al. 2018. The undisciplinary journey: early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustainability Sci. 13:191–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras M, Tabara JD, Meza A. 2016. Performing biospheric futures with younger generations: a case in the MAB Reserve of La Sepultura, Mexico. Ecol Soc. 12(2):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia I, Ravera F, Buechler S, Díaz-Reviriego I, Fernández-Giménez ME, Reed MG, Thompson-Hall M, Wilmer H, Aregu L, Cohen P, et al. 2016. A synthesis of convergent reflections, tensions and silences in linking gender and global environmental change research. AMBIO. 45:383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International society of ethnobiology code of ethics (with 2008 additions). http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke Katharina J, et al. 2016. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosystem Serv. 22 (Part B):213–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace GM. 2014. Whose conservation? Science. 345:1558–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, Montes C. 2015. Restoring the human capacity for conserving biodiversity: a social–ecological approach. Sustainability Sci. 10:699–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon K, Blackman D. 2014. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biol. 28:1167–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrotta J, Yeo-Chang Y, Camacho LD. 2016. Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 12:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Başak Dessane E, Islar M, Kelemen E, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27:7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathwell KJ, Armitage D. 2016. Art and artistic processes bridge knowledge systems about social-ecological change: an empirical examination with Inuit artists from Nunavut, Canada. Ecol Soc. 21(2):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond CM, Singh GG, Benessaiah K, Bernhardt JR, Levine J, Nelson H, Turner NJ, Norton B, Tam J, Chan KMA. 2013. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience. 63:536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, van Oudenhoven APE, de Groot R. 2015. The management relevance of biodiversity science: recommendations for conservation. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:283–285.
   Google Scholar
• Setten G, Austrheim G. 2012. Changes in land use and landscape dynamics in mountains of northern Europe: challenges for science, management and conservation. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 8:287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke M, Larigauderie A. 2018. The role, importance and challenges of social sciences and humanities in the work of the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Innovation: Eur J Soc Sci Res. 31:S10–S14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis H, Lubchenco J. 2014. Working together: a call for inclusive conservation. Nature. 515:27–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Tengö M, Brondizio E, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M. 2014. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. AMBIO. 43:579–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö M, Hill R, Malmer P, Raymond CM, Spierenburg M, Danielsen F, Elmqvist T, Folke C. 2017. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27:17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot ABM, Rankovic A, Lapeyre R, Aubert P-M, Laurans Y. 2018. Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature. Innovation: Eur J Soc Sci Res. 31(Sup1):S78–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven APE, Schröter M, de Groot R. 2016. Open access to science on ecosystem services and biodiversity. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 12:239–241.
   Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Vadrot ABM, Akhtar-Schuster M. 2018. The social sciences and the humanities in the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES) social scientists and scholars from the humanities are critical to the success of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Innovation: Eur J Soc Sci Res. 31:S1–S9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westman WE. 1977. How much are nature’s services worth? Science. 197:960–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar