Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa

References

• Abram NK, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting RK, Wells JA, Gaveau D, Pellier AS, Mengersen K. 2014. Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst Serv. 7:116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adame MF, Hermoso V, Perhans K, Lovelock CE, Herrera-Silveira JA. 2015. Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services. Conserv Biol. 29:493–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. 2005. Socio-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Sci. 309:1036–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts R, Honnay O. 2011. Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BMC Ecol. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-11-29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alongi DM. 2008. Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 76:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson J, Blignaut JN, Milton SJ, Le Maitre D, Esler KJ, Limouzin A, Fontaine C, De Wit MP, Mugido W, Prinsloo P, et al. 2010. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? A meta-analysis of recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific journals. Rest Ecol. 18:143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson J, Clewell AF, Blignaut JN, Milton SJ. 2006. Ecological restoration: A new frontier for nature conservation and economics. J Nat Conserv. 14:135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Barr CM, Sayer JA. 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–pacific: critical issues for REDD+. Biol Conserv. 154:9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon ML, editor. 2015. Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biringer J, Hansen LJ. 2005. Restoring forest landscapes in the face of climate change. In: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editors. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer (USA), p. 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brancalion PHS, Cardozo IV, Camatta A, Aronson J, Rodrigues RR. 2014. Cultural ecosystem services and popular perceptions of the benefits of an ecological restoration project in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Rest Ecol. 22:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiharta S, Erik M, Peter DE, Carlo R, Michela P, Kerrie AW. 2014. Restoring degraded tropical forests for carbon and biodiversity. Environ Res Lett. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao S, Chen L, Yu X. 2009. Impact of China’s Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi-arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province. J Appl Ecol. 46:536–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 486:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. 2009. Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Montreal: Technical Series No. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin III FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, et al. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature. 405:234–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokkalingam U, Zaichi Z, Chunfeng W, Toma T. 2006. Learning lessons from China’s forest rehabilitation efforts: national level review and special focus on Guangdong Province. Bogor (Indonesia): Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Colls A, Ash N, Ikkala N. 2009. Ecosystem-based Adaptation: a natural response to climate change. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman ND, Bernard F, Egoh B, Kalaba F, Lee N, Moolenaar S 2016. The role of ecological restoration and rehabilitation in production landscapes: an enhanced approach to sustainable development. Working paper for the UNCCD Global Land Outlook.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman ND, Bryan BA. 2006. Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biol Conserv. 128:369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossman ND, Bryan BA. 2009. Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecol Econ. 68:654–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham SC, Cavagnaro TR, Mac Nally R, Paul KI, Baker PJ, Beringer J, Thomson JR, Thompson RM. 2015. Reforestation with native mixed-species plantings in a temperate continental climate effectively sequesters and stabilizes carbon within decades. Global Change Biol. 21:1552–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederichs N, Roberts D. 2010. Greening Durban 2010. Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department, eThekwini Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Diederichs N, Roberts D. 2015. Climate protection in mega-event greening: the 2010 FIFATM World Cup and COP17/CMP7 experience in Durban, South Africa. Clim Dev. doi:10.80/17565529.2015.1085361
   Google Scholar
• Doswald N, Munroe R, Roe D, Giuliani A, Castelli I, Stephens J, Möller I, Spencer T, Vira B, Reid H. 2014. Effectiveness of ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation: review of the evidence-base. Clim Dev. doi:10.1080/17565529.2013.867247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douwes E, Rouget M, Diederichs N, O’Donoghue S, Roy K. 2015. Buffelsdraai Landfill Site Community Reforestation Project, Durban, 7-11 September XIV World Forestry Congress. Durban (South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Dudley N, Stolton S. 2005. Restoring water quality and quantity. In: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editors. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. New York (USA): Springer; p. 228–232.
   Google Scholar
• Eeley HAC, Lawes MJ, Piper SE. 1999. The influence of climate change on the distribution of indigenous forest in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Biogeogr. 26:595–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egoh BN, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Schägner JP, Bidoglio G. 2014. Exploring restoration options for habitats, species and ecosystem services in the European Union. J Appl Ecol. 51:899–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Guneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Hasse D, Sendstad M, Seto KC, et al. 2013. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel SN, Van Der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut JN, Gómez-Baggethun E, Nowak DJ, Kronenberg J, De Groot R. 2015. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 14:101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel VL, Parrotta JA. 2001. An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central São Paulo state, Brazil. For Ecol Manag. 152:169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eThekwini-Municipality. 2011. Buffelsdraai landfill site community reforestation project: community, climate and biodiversity standard project design document. Durban (South Africa): Environmental Planning and Climate Protection Department.
   Google Scholar
• eThekwini-Municipality. 2013. Economic and job creation strategy 2013. Durban: Economic Development and Investment Promotion Unit, Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes GW, Coelho MS, Machado RB, Ferreira ME, De Souza Aguiar LM, Dirzo R, Scariot A, Lopes CR. 2016. Afforestation of savannas: an impending ecological disaster. Nat Conservação. 14:146–151.
   Google Scholar
• Glenday J. 2007. Carbon storage and sequestration analysis for the eThekwini environmental services management plan open space system. Durban (South Africa): eThekwini Municipality Environmental Management Department.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 4:379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison PA, Berry PM, Simpson G, Haslett JR, Blicharska M, Bucur M, Dunford R, Egoh B, Garcia-Llorente M, Geamănă N, et al. 2014. Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosyst Serv. 9:191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulvey KB, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ, Lindenmayer DB, Lach L, Perring MP. 2013. Benefits of tree mixes in carbon plantings. Nat Clim Change. 3:869–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitha J, Lyth A. 2011. Urban wildscapes and green spaces in Mombasa and their potential contribution to climate change adaptation and mitigation. Environ Urban. 23:251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbail AAR. 2012. Local people attitudes towards community forestry practices: a case study of Kosti Province Central Sudan. Int J For Res. doi:10.1155/2012/652693
   Google Scholar
• Kotze DJ, Lawes MJ. 2007. Viability of ecological processes in small Afromontane forest patches in South Africa. Austral Ecol. 32:294–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le HD, Smith C, Herbohn J, Harrison S. 2012. More than just trees: assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries. J Rural Stud. 28:5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie P, McCabe JT. 2014. Response diversity and resilience in socio-ecological systems. Curr Anthropol. 54:114–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansourian S, Dudley N. 2005. Challenges for forest landscape restoration based on WWF’s experience to date. In: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editors. Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. New York (USA): Springer; p. 94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Marais C, Wannenburgh AM. 2008. Restoration of water resources (natural capital) through the clearing of invasive alien plants from riparian areas in South Africa — costs and water benefits. S Afr J Bot. 74:526–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron M, Cockfield G. 2008. Managing trade-offs in landscape restoration and revegetation projects. Ecol Appl. 18:2041–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazziotta A, Pouzols FM, Mönkkönen M, Kotiaho JS, Strandman H, Moilanen A. 2016. Optimal conservation resource allocation under variable economic and ecological time discounting rates in boreal forest. J Environ Manag. 180:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekoya A, Oosting SJ, Fernandez-Rivera S, Van Der Zijpp AJ. 2008. Farmers’ perceptions about exotic multipurpose fodder trees and constraints to their adoption. Agrofor Syst. 73:141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Veach V, Meller L, Pouzols FM, Arponen A, Kujala H. 2014. Zonation spatial conservation planning framework and software v. 4.0, User Manual. Helsinki (Finland): University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Munang R, Thiaw I, Alverson K, Mumba M, Liu J, Rivington M. 2013. Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: A new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negi VS, Bhatt ID, Phondani PC, Kothyari BP. 2015. Rehabilitation of degraded community land in Western Himalaya: linking environmental conservation with livelihood. Curr Sci. 109:520–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield EE, Felson AJ, Auyeung DSN, Crowther TW, Sonti NF, Harada Y, Maynard DS, Sokol NW, Ashton MS, Warren RJ, et al. 2015. Growing the urban forest: tree performance in response to biotic and abiotic land management. Rest Ecol. 23:707–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield EE, Warren RJ, Felson AJ, Bradford MA. 2013. FORUM: challenges and future directions in urban afforestation. J Appl Ecol. 50:1169–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi F, Church RL, Geneletti D. 2011. Restoring forest landscapes for biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods: A spatial optimisation model. Environ Model Softw. 26:1622–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi F, Geneletti D. 2010. Identifying priority areas for forest landscape restoration in Chiapas (Mexico): an operational approach combining ecological and socioeconomic criteria. Landscape Urban Plan. 94:20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patz JA, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, Foley JA. 2005. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature. 438:310–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton L. 2010. Measuring and monitoring the economic effects of habitat restoration: a summary of a NOAA Blue Ribbon Panel. Duke University (Durham, North Carolina, USA): Restoring America’s Estuaries and the Nicholas Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Perring MP, Standish RJ, Price JN, Craig MD, Erickson TE, Ruthrof KX, Whiteley AS, Valentine LE, Hobbs RJ. 2015. Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades. Ecosphere. 6:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotto D, Craven D, Montagnini F, Alice F. 2011. Silvicultural and economic aspects of pure and mixed native tree species plantations on degraded pasturelands in humid Costa Rica. New Forest. 39:365–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouzols FM, Burgman MA, Moilanen A. 2012. Methods for allocation of habitat management, maintenance, restoration and offsetting, when conservation actions have uncertain consequences. Biol Conserv. 153:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouzols FM, Moilanen A. 2012. RobOff – user manual software for robust offsetting, habitat restoration, maintenance and allocation of conservation: analysis of alternative land-use options and allocation of conservation resources to multiple actions. Finland: Biodiversity Informatics Conservation Group, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Pouzols FM, Moilanen A. 2013. RobOff: software for analysis of alternative land-use options and conservation actions. Methods Ecol Evol. 4:426–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport DI, Tambosi LR, Metzger JP. 2015. A landscape triage approach: combining spatial and temporal dynamics to prioritize restoration and conservation. J Appl Ecol. 52:590–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees PW, Everett P. 2012. Tree strategy: supplementary planning document. Department of the built environment. UK: City of London.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts D, O’Donoghue S. 2013. Urban environmental challenges and climate change action in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban. 25:299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena KG, Rao KS, Sen KK, Maikhuri RK, Semwal RL. 2001. Integrated natural resource management: approaches and lessons from the Himalaya. Conserv Ecol. 5:14. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art14/
   Google Scholar
• Sayer JA, Chokkalingam U, Poulsen J. 2004. The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological values. For Ecol Manag. 201:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schewenius M, McPhearson T, Elmqvist T. 2014. Opportunities for increasing resilience and sustainability of urban social–ecological systems: insights from the URBES and the cities and biodiversity outlook projects. AMBIO. 43:434–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J. 2002. Afforestation and reforestation in the clean development mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol: implications for forests and forest people. Int J Glo Environ Issues. 2:322–343.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A. 2009. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series no. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson JR, Moilanen AJ, Vesk PA, Bennett AF, Nally RM. 2009. Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. Ecol Appl. 19:817–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrubia S, McRale BH, Lawler JJ, Hall SA, Halabisky M, Langdon J, Case M. 2014. Getting the most connectivity per conservation dollar. Front Ecol Environ. 12:491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpie JK, Marais C, Blignaut JN. 2008. The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecol Econ. 65:788–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2015. Population 2030: Demographic challenges and opportunities for sustainable development planning (ST/ESA/SER.A/389).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations−Habitat. 2011. Cities and climate change − global report on human settlements. London (UK): United Nations Human Settlement Programme, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler K, Ager A, Day M, Jennings M, Bailey J. 2015. Prioritization of forest restoration projects: tradeoffs between wildfire protection, ecological restoration and economic objectives. Forests. 6. doi:10.3390/f6124375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Maltitz G, Geldenhuys C, Lawes M, Eeley H, Adie H, Vink D, Fleming G, Bailey C. 2003. Classification system for South African indigenous forests. CSIR (Pretoria): Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson KA, Lulow M, Burger J, Fang Y-C, Andersen C, Olson D, O’Connell M, McBride MF. 2011. Optimal restoration: accounting for space, time and uncertainty. J Appl Ecol. 48:715–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SJ, Rhemtulla JM. 2016. Acceleration and novelty: community restoration speeds recovery and transforms species composition in young Andean cloud forest. Ecological Appl. 26:203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortley L, Hero JM, Howes M. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecol. 21:537–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XE Currency Converter. 2015. [Accessed 2015 Nov 2]. http://www.xe.com/
   Google Scholar