Trust, calculativeness, and relationships: A special issue 20 years after Williamson's warning

References

• Agndal, H., & Nilsson, U. (2009). Interorganizational cost management in the exchange process. Management Accounting Research, 20(2), 85–101. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (Eds.). (2008). Landmark papers on trust: Vol. I & II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. doi:10.1086/292745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J. (2008). Analysing global economic organization: Embedded networks and global chains compared. Economy and Society, 37(3), 339–364. doi:10.1080/03085140802172664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2005). Trust and the performative construction of markets. MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/8. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). The F-connection: Friends, families, and firms and the organization of exchange. Population and Development Review, 6(1), 1–30. doi:10.2307/1972655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 459–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigley, G. A., & Pearce, J. L. (1998). Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 405–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1988). A theory of cooperation in international business. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 31–54). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chinitz, D. (2013). The special interdisciplinary contribution of institutional economics. Health Economics, Policy, and Law, 8(3), 387–396. doi:10.1017/S1744133113000182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2014). Genuine, non-calculative trust with calculative antecedents: Reconsidering Williamson on trust. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, R. (1993). On the uses of ‘trust’: Comment on Williamson, ‘Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization’. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 487–500. doi:10.1086/467285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85–116. doi:10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040274.23551.1b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. (1988). Trust and political agency. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S. P. (2002). Memory as a moral decision: The role of ethics in organizational culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrin, D. L. (2013). On the institutionalisation of trust research and practice: Heaven awaits! Journal of Trust Research, 3(2), 146–154. doi:10.1080/21515581.2013.822669
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, M. (2001). Trust is good, control is expensive: Trust as a key category in economic action. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27(4), 576–592.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2014). Calculativeness and trust: A view from phenomenology. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (Ed.). (1988). Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112. doi:10.2307/256729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Henslin, J. M. (1968). Trust and the cab driver. In M. Truzzi (Ed.), Sociology and everyday life (pp. 138–158). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, M. (1998). Trust within reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, L. (1998). Trust in business relations: Economic logic or social interaction? Umeå: Boréa.
   Google Scholar
• James, H., Jr. (2014). You can have your trust and calculativeness, too: Uncertainty, trustworthiness and the Williamson thesis. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (1996). Dispositifs de confiance et engagements crédibles [Arrangements of trust and credible commitments]. Sociologie du travail, 38(4), 527–550.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (1998). La confinance: réalité ou illusion? Examen critique d'une thèse de Williamson [Trust: Reality or illusion? A critical look at a Williamson's thesis]. Revue économique, 49(4), 1043–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (2013). Itinerary in economic sociology: Lucien Karpik interviewed by Sophie Dubuisson-Quellier. Economic Sociology – The European Electronic Newsletter, 15(1), 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (2014). Trust: Reality or illusion? A critical examination of Williamson. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, E. L. (Ed.). (2003). Trust (Critical studies in economic institutions, 3). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Korczynski, M. (2000). The political economy of trust. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (Ed.). (2006). Organizational trust: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.). (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. In J. E. Alt & K. A. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (Eds.). (1998). Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (1998). Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19, 829–861. doi:10.1177/017084069801900506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (2011). The rigour–relevance balance for engaged scholarship: New frame and new agenda for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.550718
   Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (2013). Entrepreneurship as a new context for trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 3(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/21515581.2013.771500
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, F. (2006). Managing co-operation: Trust and power in Ghanaian associations. Organization Studies, 27(1), 31–52. doi:10.1177/0170840605056392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, B., & Mehta, J. (1997). Contracts, opportunism and trust: Self-interest and social orientation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(2), 239–257. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B. (2011). Reorganizing the boundaries of trust: From discrete alternatives to hybrid forms. Organization Science, 22(5), 1266–1276. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. E. (2001). The importance of being trusted. Boston University Law Review, 81(3), 591–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. E. (2004). Structure as an independent variable in assessing stock market failures. George Washington Law Review, 72(3), 547–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000190
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2002). Perceived trustworthiness and inter-firm governance: Empirical evidence from the UK printing industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(2), 139–160. doi:10.1093/cje/26.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2013). Trust without knowledge? Comment on Hardin, “Government without trust.” Journal of Trust Research, 3(1), 53–58. doi:10.1080/21515581.2013.771504
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. D. (1998). Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 92–125. doi:10.1086/210003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven, N. (1995). The argumentational texture of transaction cost economics. Organization Studies, 16(4), 605–623. doi:10.1177/017084069501600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6), 985–1010. doi:10.1177/017084069601700605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy, 28(8), 793–805. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2000). Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems. Organization Studies, 21(5), 915–939. doi:10.1177/0170840600215004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2004). Governance and competence: How can they be combined? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(4), 505–525. doi:10.1093/cje/28.4.505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 308–338. doi:10.2307/256885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich-Graefe, R. (2014). Calculative trust: Oxymoron or tautology? Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1997). From marketisation to diplomacy: It's the mix that matters. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(2), 40–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (2004). The role of relational trust in bank-small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 400–410. doi:10.2307/20159589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, T., & Kwon, I.-W. G. (2006). Matter over mind: When specific asset investment affects calculative trust in supply chain partnership. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2), 191–201. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1991). Public trust in organizations and institutions: A sociological perspective, Workshop on establishing institutional credibility. National Academy of Sciences, Denver, October 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society, 30(2), 166–193. doi:10.1177/0095399798302003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331–356). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1993). The other side of the economic looking glass: Bringing embeddedness back in. Working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Verwaal, E., Verdu, A. J., & Recter, A. (2008). Transaction costs and organisational learning in strategic outsourcing relationships. International Journal of Technology Management, 41(1), 38–54. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2008.015983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993a). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics 36(1), 453–486. doi:10.1086/467284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993b). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 97–107. doi:10.1002/mde.4090140203
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993c). Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2), 107–156. doi:10.1093/icc/2.1.107
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993d). Calculated trust, a reply to Craswell's comment on Williamson. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 501–502. doi:10.1086/467286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (2012). Transaction cost economics: What are the questions? Paper for the Oliver E. Williamson Seminar on Institutional Analysis, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 5 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 8., pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar