Relational trust: Outline of a Bourdieusian theory of interpersonal trust

References

• Adobor, H. (2005). Trust as sensemaking: The microdynamics of trust in interfirm alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58, 330–337. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00077-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organizations Studies, 32, 281–301. doi:10.1177/0170840610397477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. (2009). A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theory and Society, 38, 367–382. doi:10.1007/s11186-009-9087-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. NJ: Rutgers.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, R. H. (1972). Deceivers and deceived: Observations on confidence men and their victims, informants and their quarry, political and industrial spies and ordinary citizens. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986a). Distinction – A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986b). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Field of cultural production, essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1999). The space of points of view. In P. Bourdieu et al. (Eds.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (pp. 607–626). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The craft of sociology. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110856460
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. (2009). The phenomenology of trust: A Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynae-oncology patients. Health, Risk & Society, 11, 391–407. doi:10.1080/13698570903180455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie, J., & Howson, A. (2005). ‘Leaps of faith’ and MMR: An empirical study of trust. Sociology, 39, 221–239. doi:10.1177/0038038505050536
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347–366. doi:10.2307/2695833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassirer, E. (2000). The logic of the cultural sciences: Five studies. New York: Vail-Ballou Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 95–120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in ‘most people’?: Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76, 786–807. doi:10.1177/0003122411420817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1998). On civilization, power, and knowledge – Selected writings. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317. doi:10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1965). Childhood and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2012a). Suspending the unknown: The foundations, limits, and variability of intersubjective trust ( Published PhD thesis). Copenhagen: Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2012b). Dimensions of trust: An empirical revisit to Simmel's formal sociology of trust. Current Sociology, 60, 733–750. doi:10.1177/0011392112461800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2013). Trust in the face of uncertainty: A qualitative study of intersubjective trust and risk. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 130–144. doi:10.1080/03906701.2014.894335
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2014). Calculativeness and trust: A view from phenomenology. Journal of trust research, 4(1), 34–43. doi:10.1080/21515581.2014.891319
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of and experiments with ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gausdal, A. H. (2012). Trust-building processes in the context of networks. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1), 7–30. doi:10.1080/21515581.2012.662449
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and selfidentity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grøn, A. (2010). Trust, sociality and selfhood. In A. Grøn, & C. Welz (Eds.), Trust, sociality and selfhood (pp. 13–30). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1991). Trusting persons, trusting institutions. In R. J. Zeckhauser (Ed.), Strategy and choice (pp. 185–209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21, 505–529. doi:10.1177/0032329293021004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1995). Cartesian meditations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. (2010). Balancing trust and control in organizations: Towards a process perspective. Society and Business Review, 5, 259–269. doi:10.1108/17465681011079482
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (2014). Trust: Reality or illusion? A critical examination of Williamson. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 22–33. doi:10.1080/21515581.2014.891318
   Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D. (2007). Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach. Sociology, 41(1), 115–132. doi:10.1177/0038038507072285
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., Hanna, B. A., Su, S., & Wei, J. (2001). Collective identity, collective trust, and social capital: Linking group identification and group cooperation. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 173–196). Manhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeger, F. (2012). Trusting organizations: The institutionalizations of trust in inter-organizational relationships. Organization, 19, 743–763. doi:10.1177/1350508411420900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict cooperation and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch (pp. 133–173). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32, 991–1022. doi:10.1177/0149206306294405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985. doi:10.1093/sf/63.4.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (2012). The social dynamics of trust: Theoretical and empirical research, 1985–2012. Social Forces, 91(1), 25–31. doi:10.1093/sf/sos116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital – A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, F., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. N. K. (Eds). (2012). Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (2011). Trust: Acceptance of, precaution against and cause of vulnerability. Comparative Sociology, 10, 358–379. doi:10.1163/156913311X578190
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. E. (2001). The importance of being trusted. Boston University Law Review, 81, 591–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35, 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2005a). Rational, institutional, and active trust: Just do it!? In K. Bijlsma-Frankema, & R. K. Woolthuis (Eds.), Trust under pressure: Empirical investigations of trust and trust building in uncertain circumstances (pp. 17–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2005b). The trust/control nexus: An integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20, 283–305.10.1177/0268580905055478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2014). Trust, calculativeness, and relationships: A special issue 20 years after Williamson. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 1–21.10.1080/21515581.2014.891316
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. B. (2011). Trust in strategic alliances: Toward a co-evolutionary research model. Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 159–176. doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.603510
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 41–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reemtsma, J. P. (2012). Trust and violence: An essay on a modern relationship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40, 441–459. doi:10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344–354. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24348410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 40(2), 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1910). How is society possible? American Journal of Sociology, 16, 372–391. doi:10.1086/211904
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, T. B. (2012). A social interactions perspective on trust and its determinants. Journal of Trust Research, 2(2), 107–135. doi:10.1080/21515581.2012.708496
   Google Scholar
• Sloyan, R. M. (2009). Trust, sensemaking, and individual responses to organizational change ( Published PhD Thesis). Benedictine University. Retrieved 10-4-2014 from: http://gradworks.umi.com/33/54/3354372.html
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 413–424. doi:10.1002/ejsp.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2001). Why do people rely on others? Social identity and the social aspects of trust. In K. S. Cook, R. Hardin, & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust in society (pp. 285–306). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2008). The foundations of trust: Macro and micro. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(2), 289–294. doi:10.1093/cje/bem039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, S. (1990). The crisis as a bank ruptcy of trust: The fiduciary attitude, human nature and ethical science. International Sociology, 5, 287–298. doi:10.1177/026858090005003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, S. (1991). How is society possible? Intersubjectivity and the fiduciary attitude as problems of the social group in Mead, Gurwitsch and Schutz. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, L. R., & Carter, A. I. (2003). The social construction of trust. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486. doi:10.1086/467284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A., & Ehnert, I. (2010). Making sense of trust across cultural contexts. In M. N. K. Saunders, D. Skinner, G. Dietz, N. Gillespie, & Lewicki, R.J. (Eds.), Organizational trust: A cultural perspective (pp. 107–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior 8(1), 53–111.
   Google Scholar