The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses

References

• Abramson, P. R., & Finifter, A. W. (1981). On the meaning of political trust: New evidence from items introduced in 1978. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 297–307. doi: 10.2307/2110854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R. (2011). At the crossroads: Future directions in trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 203–213. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2011.603513
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bangerter, A. (2014). Investigating and rebuilding public trust in preparation for the next pandemic. European Psychologist, 19(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘fair’ process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 747–758. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029006007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, M. F., Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. (2003). Trust in international joint venture relationships. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1031–1042. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00315-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (Eds.). (2015). Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023. doi: 10.2307/2111684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–163). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2007–2008). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review, 44, 4–25.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Castillo, C., Woodson, B. W., Theiss-Morse, E., Sacks, T., Fleig-Palmer, M. M., & Peek, M. E. (2016). Examining the relationship between interpersonal and institutional trust in political and health care contexts. In E. Shockley, T. M.S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 99–115). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning (s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 657–668. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0491-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cen, G., & Yu, J. (2014). Traditional Chinese philosophies and their perspectives on moral education. In L. Nucci, D. Narvaez, & T. Krettanauer (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (2nd ed., pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L. M., & Cohn, E. S. (2016). Institutional trust across cultures: Its definitions, conceptualizations, and antecedents across Eastern and Western European Nations. In E. Shockley, T. M.S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 157–176). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1183–1206. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.0572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00992337
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI). In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Currall, S. C., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 151–170. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Alberts, H. J. (2004). When procedural fairness does not influence how positive I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness need. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 333–344. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151–218. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35(5), 557–588. doi: 10.1108/00483480610682299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 373–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30(4), 541–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 383–416. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889–906. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 473–489. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., & Fainshmidt, S. (2013). Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale. Journal of Trust Research, 3(2), 76–97. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2013.820026
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16(4), 473–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2013). Consent searches as a threat to procedural justice and police legitimacy: An analysis of consent requests during traffic stops. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(6), 759–777. doi: 10.1177/0887403412464547
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003). Measuring attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 354–367. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2005). Why do people accept public policies they oppose? Testing legitimacy theory with a survey-based experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 58(2), 187–201. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, N. A. (2003). Measuring trust in working relationships: The behavioral trust inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588–607. doi:10.1108/02683940410551507
   Google Scholar
• Grau, L., Chandler, B., Burton, B., & Kolditz, D. (1991). Institutional loyalty and job satisfaction among nurse aides in nursing homes. Journal of Aging and Health, 3(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1177/089826439100300103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamm, J. A. (2014). Understanding the role of trust in cooperation with a natural resources institution. (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Psychology. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Lincoln, NE. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss/63/
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., Hoffman, L., Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (in press). On the influence of trust in predicting rural land owner cooperation with natural resource management institutions. Journal of Trust Research. doi:10.1080/21515581.2015.1108202
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., & Hoffman, L. (2013). Deconstructing public confidence in state courts. Journal of Trust Research, 3, 11–31. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2013.771501
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Tomkins, A. J., Dietrich, H., & Michaels, S. (2013). Trust and intention to comply with a water allocation decision: The moderating roles of knowledge and consistency. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 49. doi:10.5751/ES-05849-180449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., & Neeley, E. (2011). Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 95–115. doi: 10.1002/bsl.965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Tomkins, A. J., & PytlikZillig, L. M. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 815–840. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, M., & Rothmann, S. (2015). Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 12. doi:10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The omnibus T-Scale. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–208). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoguchi, T., Mikami, S., & Fujii, S. (2007). Social capital in East Asia: Comparative political culture in Confucian societies. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8, 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., & Gau, J. M. (2016). Carving up concepts? Differentiating between trust and legitimacy in public attitudes towards legal authority. In E. Shockley, T. M.S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 49–70). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungermann, H., Pfister, H. R., & Fischer, K. (1996). Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 16(2), 251–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00783.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231–252. doi: 10.1177/0093650206298071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In M. Levi & V. Braithwaite (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch (pp. 133–173). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P. P. (2008). Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 3, 413–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. (2007). Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. The Journal of Politics, 69, 237–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00507.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. R. (2005). Trust, untrust, distrust and mistrust–an exploration of the dark (er) side. In P. Herrmann, V. Issarny, & S. Shiu (Eds.), Trust management: Third international conference, iTrust proceedings (pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2004). Compliance motivations: Affirmative and negative bases. Law & Society Review, 38(1), 41–68. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. doi: 10.2307/256727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClendon, M. J. (1991). Acquiescence and recency response-order effects in interview surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(1), 60–103. doi: 10.1177/0049124191020001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. Trust in Cyber-societies: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2246, 27–54. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., & Choudhury, V. (2006). Distrust and trust in B2C e-commerce: Do they differ? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Electronic commerce: The new e-commerce: Innovations for conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful business on the internet.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334–359. doi: 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentovich, A., Rhee, E., & Tyler, T. R. (2014). My life for a voice: The influence of voice on health-care decisions. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 99–117. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0201-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metlay, D. (1999). Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire. In G. T. Cvetkovich & R. Lofstedt (Eds.), Social trust and the management of risk (pp. 100–116). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Mplus statistical software version 7.11. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts. (2000). National conference on public trust and confidence in the judicial system: National action plan: A guide for state and national organizations. Retrieved 15 May, 2015, from http://cdm16501.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/ctcomm/id/20
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214. doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2009, January 21). Open government initiative: Transparency, participation, collaboration. Retrieved 15 May, 2015, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2585925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, L. (2014). A comparative analysis of political confidence in the BRICS countries. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15, 417–441. doi: 10.1017/S1468109914000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, R., Wilcox, H. D., & Grover, V. (2003). The role of system trust in business-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3), 197–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2007). What matters to whom? Managing trust across multiple stakeholder groups. ( Working Paper No. 39). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations.
   Google Scholar
• Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science, 22, 1087–1104. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 961–972. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: Toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1674–1700. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L. M., Abdel-Monem, T., Herian, M. N., Williams, D., & Tomkins, A. J. (2011). Taking Charge 2011 Final Report. University of Nebraska Public Policy Center, Lincoln, NE.
   Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L. M., & Kimbrough, C. D. (2016). Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? In E. Shockley, T. M.S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration (pp. 17–47). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., & Abdel-Monem, T. (2012). Public input methods and confidence in government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6, 92–111. doi: 10.1108/17506161211214840
   Google Scholar
• PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Muhlberger, P., Pardy, R. L., Morris, J. T., Dzenis, Y. A., … Collins, T. P. (2011). Using public engagements to provide input and insights into policy, legal, ethical, and other impacts of science. The International Journal of Science in Society, 2, 273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 283–294. doi: 10.1037/h0026086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 343–351. doi: 10.2307/3151568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24348410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. (2010). Structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. A., Thwaites, R., Curtis, A., & Millar, J. (2013). Trust and trustworthiness: Conceptual distinctions and their implications for natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(8), 1246–1265. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.717052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2012). On the perpetuation of ignorance: System dependence, system justification, and the motivated avoidance of sociopolitical information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 264–280. doi: 10.1037/a0026272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. H., & Sherman, D. M. (1998). The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 422–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, E., Neal, T. M.S., PytlikZillig, L. M., & Bornstein, B. H. (2016). Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. W., Leahy, J. E., Anderson, D. H., & Davenport, M. A. (2013). Community/agency trust: A measurement instrument. Society & Natural Resources, 26(4), 472–477. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.742606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. J., & Tambyah, S. K. (2011). Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 103, 357–377. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9703-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Princeton, NJ. (Reissue; originally published in 1990): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2007–2008). Procedural justice and the courts. Court Review, 44, 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell-Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–199). SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, S., & Six, F. (2013). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2014). Managing democracies in turbulent times: Trust, performance, and governance in modern states. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (1999). Democracy and trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. (1992). Correcting for acquiescent response bias in the absence of a balanced scale an application to class consciousness. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(1), 52–88. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1139–1147. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, T. (2014). Philosophical moorings. In L. Nucci, D. Narvaez, & T. Krettanauer (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (2nd ed., pp. 11–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X. N., & Wang, E. P. (2013). Outcome favorability as a boundary condition to voice effect on people's reactions to public policymaking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 329–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 706–724. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar