Engaging Preservice Teachers in the Design of Digital Breakout Games in an Educational Technology Course

References

• Adams, C. (2019). TPACK model: The ideal modern classroom. In R. Power (Ed.), Technology and the curriculum. Ontario Tech University. https://techandcurr2019.pressbooks.com/chapter/tpack-modern-classroom/
   Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu, M., & Kale, U. (2016). Teaching to teach (with) game design: Game design and learning workshops for preservice teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 60–81.
   Google Scholar
• An, Y. J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K-12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784681
   Google Scholar
• Annetta, L. A. (2010). The “I’s” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonenko, P. D., Davis, R., Wang, J., & Celepkolu, M. (2019). On the same wavelength: Exploring team neurosynchrony in undergraduate dyads solving a cyberlearning problem with collaborative scripts. Mind, Brain, & Education, 13(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddix, J. P. (2018). Research methods and applications for student affairs. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Boser, U. (2013, June 14). Are schools getting a big enough bang for their education technology buck? Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2013/06/14/66485/are-schools-getting-a-big-enough-bang-for-their-education-technology-buck/
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, P. (2013). Blogging in the classroom: Using technologies to promote learner-centered pedagogies. The Researcher: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Breakout EDU. (2018). http://www.breakoutedu.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bressler, D. M., & Annetta, L. A. (2021). Using game design to increase teachers’ familiarity with design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09628-4
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. (2020). In the flow: Striking a balance between challenging and motivating students. The Learning Council. https://www.thelearningcounsel.com/article/flow-striking-balance-between-challenging-and-motivating-students
   Google Scholar
• Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). “Clear as mud:” Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201
   Google Scholar
• Cain, J. (2019). Exploratory implementation of a blended format escape room in a large enrollment pharmacy management class. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 11(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz, C. (2015). The development of TPACK, technology integrated self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations of pre-service physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.932332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., Peel, D. J., Arnab, S., Morini, L., Keegan, H., & Wood, O. (2017). EscapED: A framework for creating educational escape rooms and interactive games for higher/further education. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i3.180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_15
   Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, S. (2018). Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2699–2718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. Y., & Hargadon, A. (2001). The pleasures of immersion and engagement: Schemas, scripts and the fifth business. Digital Creativity, 12(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1076/digc.12.3.153.3231
   Google Scholar
• Ebersole, L. (2019). Preservice teacher experience with technology integration: How the preservice teacher’s efficacy in technology integration is impacted by the context of the preservice teacher education program. Internal Dialogues on Education: Past and Present, 6(2), 124–138.
   Google Scholar
• Farus-Brown, S., Tiberio, C., Sweet, S., & Fox, M. (2020). Escaping traditional teaching methods: How to use escape rooms in undergraduate nursing education. AURCO Journal, 26, 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, D., & Reid, D. (2018). Technology and teaching: Technology and student-centered pedagogy in 21st century classrooms. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology integration models in teacher education (pp. 69–87). Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Florida State University Learning Systems Institute. (2019a). CPALMS standards. https://www.cpalms.org/public/search/Standard
   Google Scholar
• Florida State University Learning Systems Institute. (2019b). CPALMS standards for English language arts: Reading standards for literature. https://www.cpalms.org/Public/PreviewStandard/Preview/5973
   Google Scholar
• Fotaris, P., & Mastoras, T. (2019). Escape rooms for learning: A systematic review. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning, 235–243. doi10.34190/GBL.19.179
   Google Scholar
• Google Workspace. (n.d.). G Suite just got better—Introducing Google Workspace. https://workspace.google.com/
   Google Scholar
• Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from Google Classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, B. (2015, June 11). Why ed tech is not transforming teaching. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2015/06/11/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S. Y., Kuo, Y. H., & Chen, H. C. (2020). Applying digital escape rooms infused with science teaching in elementary school: Learning performance, learning motivation, and problem-solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. E., Cheah, Y. H., Shi, Y., & Hsiao, K. H. (2020). Preservice and inservice teachers’ pedagogical reasoning underlying their most-valued technology-supported instructional activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. E., & Read, M. F. (2018). Student experiences of technology integration in school subjects: A comparison across four middle schools. Middle Grades Review, 4(1), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). The digital use divide: Challenges to technology implementation. https://connect.iste.org/blogs/matthew-hiefield/2017/11/25/the-digital-use-divide
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, C., Aris, N., Alberto, A., Ruiz, M., & Orcos, L. (2020). Digital escape room using Genial.Ly and a breakout to learn algebra at secondary education level in Spain. Education Sciences, 10(10), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, A. (2018, July 28). Why my school had every teacher become a Google Certified Educator. Andrew Julian. https://medium.com/@andrewjjulian/why-my-school-had-every-teacher-become-a-google-certified-educator-b25c40c7da53
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. (1994). Minds in play. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroski, E. (2020). How to create free digital breakouts for libraries. Library Technology Reports, 56(3), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kutzin, J. (2019). Escape the room: Innovative approaches to interprofessional education. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(8), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190719-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Kim, C. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a TI course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Lemieux, C., Vandermeiden, E., & Nathoo, S. (2013). Are you ready to teach secondary mathematics in the 21st century? A study of preservice teachers’ digital game design experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782608
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Josey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, K. L., Alvarado-Albertorio, F., & Ramírez-Salgado, A. (2020). Online approaches for implementing a digital escape room with preservice teachers. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 28(2), 415–424.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2015). Peeking behind the locked door: A survey of escape room facilities [White paper]. Brantford Games Network and BGNlab. http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/erfacwhite.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2016). Ask why: Creating a better player experience through environmental storytelling and consistency in escape room design (Vols. 1–17). Meaningful Play 2016. http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/askwhy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2018). Creating engaging escape rooms for the classroom. Childhood Education, 94(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.1420363
   Google Scholar
• Nybo, S. E., Sahr, M., Young, M., Axford, K., Sohn, M., Lyons, M., & Klepser, M. (2020). Design of a large-scale escape room for first-year pharmacy student orientation. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12(11), 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National education technology plan update. U.S. Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1990). Constructionist learning. MIT Media Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Battelle for Kids. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C., Hewitt, K. K., Mullen, C. A., Lashley, C., Eldridge, J., & Douglas, T. R. M. (2015). Digital youth in brick and mortar schools: Examining the complex interplay of students, technology, education, and change. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(5), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J., & Ito, M. (2017). From good intentions to real outcomes: Equity by design in learning technologies. Connected Learning Alliance. https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GIROreport_1031.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B., & Tabak, I. (2014). Scaffolding. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 44–62). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. (2017). Lessons learned while escaping from a zombie: Designing a Breakout EDU game. The History Teacher, 50(4), 553–564.
   Google Scholar
• Sancar Tokmak, H. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on TPACK development after designing educational games. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.939611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, E., & Plumettaz-Sieber, M. (2019). Teaching and learning with escape games from debriefing to institutionalization of knowledge. International Conference on Games and Learning Alliance, vol. 11385, 242––253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7
   Google Scholar
• Saubern, R., Urbach, D., Koehler, M., & Phillips, M. (2020). Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology. Computers & Education, 147, 103784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
   Google Scholar
• Selinker, M., & Snyder, T. (2013). Puzzle craft: The ultimate guide on how to construct every kind of puzzle. Puzzlewright.
   Google Scholar
• Short, M. N. (2018). Technology and digital content: Promoting learning-centered pedagogy. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology integration models in teacher education (pp. 227–243). Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Sondgeroth, B. (2016, September 23). 3 reasons educators should become a Level 1 Google Certified Educator. EdTechTeacher. https://edtechteacher.org/3-reasons-educators-become-level-1-google-certified-educator-ben/
   Google Scholar
• Uluay, G., & Dogan, A. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ practices towards digital game design for technology integration into science classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2471–2498. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041028
   Google Scholar
• Veldkamp, A., van de Grint, L., Knippels, M. C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in education. Educational Research Review, 31, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, M. A. (2014). Archive 2.0: What composition students and academic libraries can gain from digital-collaborative pedagogies. Composition Studies, 42(1), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishers USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Cheng, L. (2020). The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge. Computers & Education, 156, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar