Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes

References

• Abarbanell, L., & Hauser, M.D. (2010). Mayan morality: An exploration of permissible harms. Cognition, 115, 207–224. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A.M., & Salas, O. (2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner's dilemma game decisions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 242–246. 10.1016/j.socec.2010.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Akay, A., Karabulut, G., & Martinsson, P. (2013). The effect of religiosity and religious festivals on positional concerns: An experimental investigation of Ramadan. Applied Economics, 45, 3914–3921. 10.1080/00036846.2012.736944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, O., Rand, D.G., & Gal, Y.K. (2012). Economic games on the Internet: The effect of $1 stakes. PLoS ONE, 7, e31461. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, T., Ohtsuki, H., Wakeley, J., Taylor, P.D., & Nowak, M.A. (2009). Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8597–8600. 10.1073/pnas.0902528106
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30. 10.1162/BIOT_a_00018
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D.J., Choi, J.J., & Fisher, G. (2010). Religious identity and economic behavior. NBER Working Paper Series, 15925, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bering, J.M., & Johnson, D.D.P. (2005). “O Lord you perceive my thoughts from afar:” Recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 118–142. 10.1163/1568537054068679
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442, 912–915. 10.1038/nature04981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I., & Frey, B.S. (1999). The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38, 43–57. 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00121-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M.D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S.D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. 10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Religious solidarity: The hand grenade experiment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 295–320. 10.1163/156853708X358191
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640. 10.1126/science.1144237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costin, F. (1969). The scrambled sentence test: A group measure of hostility. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 461–468. 10.1177/001316446902900224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P.K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In R. Hassin, J. Uleman, & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 77–106). New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dreber, A., Rand, D.G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don't punish. Nature, 452, 348–351. 10.1038/nature06723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efferson, C., Lalive, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321, 1844–1849. 10.1126/science.1155805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbach, A., Friedman, R.S., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J.H., & Christakis, N.A. (2010). Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5334–5338. 10.1073/pnas.0913149107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J.H., & Kam, C.D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. Journal of Politics, 69, 813–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. 10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, F., Tarnita, C.E., Christakis, N.A., Wang, L., Rand, D.G., & Nowak, M.A. (2012). Evolution of in-group favoritism. Science Reports, 2460.
   Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, D., Rand, D.G., & Dreber, A. (2012). Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. American Economic Review, 102, 720–749. 10.1257/aer.102.2.720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J., & van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2011). Evolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 277–287. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, W.M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496. 10.1126/science.1215647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Baron, J. (1996). Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 201–218. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199603)26:2%3C201::AID-EJSP745%3E3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., & Ziker, J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484. 10.1126/science.1182238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, R. (2012). The experimental economics of religion. Journal of Economic Surveys. 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00716.x
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J.J., Rand, D.G., & Zeckhauser, R.J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399–425. 10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., & Tullett, A.M. (2010). Reflecting on God. Psychological Science, 21, 1184.doi: 10.1177/0956797610375451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, A.V., Burkart, J.M., & Van Schaik, C.P. (2010). On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: Combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2723–2735. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (2005). God's punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16, 410–446. 10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S. (2006). Learning to live in a global commons: Socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment. Ecological Research, 21, 328–333. 10.1007/s11284-006-0162-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2011). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research Methods, 44, 1–23. 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda, N., & Ohtsuki, H. (2007). Tag-based indirect reciprocity by incomplete social information. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 689–695. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3759
   Google Scholar
• McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125.
   Google Scholar
• Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H.J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Nature, 415, 424–426. 10.1038/415424a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62. 10.1126/science.1158757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, M.A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560–1563. 10.1126/science.1133755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, M.A. (2011). Supercooperators. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298. 10.1038/nature04131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P.G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raihani, N.J., & Bshary, R. (2012). A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0758.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G. (2012). The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 172–179. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G., Arbesman, S., & Christakis, N.A. (2011). Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 19193–19198. 10.1073/pnas.1108243108
   Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M.A. (2009). Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science, 325, 1272–1275. 10.1126/science.1177418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G., Greene, J.D., & Nowak, M.A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489, 427–430. 10.1038/nature11467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G., & Nowak, M.A. (2011). The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nature Communications, 2, 434.doi: 10.1038/ncomms1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D.G., Pfeiffer, T., Dreber, A., Sheketoff, R.W., Wernerfelt, N.C., & Benkler, Y. (2009). Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 6187–6191. 10.1073/pnas.0811552106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riolo, R.L., Cohen, M.D., & Axelrod, R. (2001). Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature, 414, 441–443. 10.1038/35106555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockenbach, B., & Milinski, M. (2006). The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature, 444, 718–723. 10.1038/nature05229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffle, B.J., & Sosis, R. (2010). Do religious contexts elicit more trust and altruism? An experiment on Facebook. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1566123
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, N. (2010). Shame and religious prosociality. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1644241
   Google Scholar
• Salwen, K., & Salwen, H. (2010). The power of half: One family's decision to stop taking and start giving back. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., Corneille, O., & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening:” Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143–154. 10.1080/10508610902880063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A.F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Rand, D.G., & Greene, J.D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428. 10.1037/a0025391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund, K. (2010). The calculus of selfishness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2009). The world's religions. New York: HarperOne. ( Originally published 1949).
   Google Scholar
• Sosis, R. (2006). Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the evolution of religion. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion, Vol. I (pp. 61–86). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12, 264–274. 10.1002/evan.10120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B.J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44, 713–741. 10.1086/379260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, S., & Watts, D.J. (2011). Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS ONE, 6, e16836. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., Billig, R.P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ule, A., Schram, A., Riedl, A., & Cason, T.N. (2009). Indirect punishment and generosity toward strangers. Science, 326, 1701–1704. 10.1126/science.1178883
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vilaythong, T.O., Lindner, N.M., & Nosek, B.A. (2010). “Do unto others:” Effects of priming the golden rule on Buddhists' and Christians' attitudes toward gay people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 494–506. 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedekind, C., & Milinski, M. (2000). Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288, 850–852. 10.1126/science.288.5467.850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbuch-Remington, M., Mendes, W.B., Seery, M.D., & Blascovich, J. (2005). The influence of religious stimuli outside of subjective awareness during motivated performance situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1203–1216. 10.1177/0146167205274448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, J.L. (2004). The automatic activation of religious concepts: Implications for religious orientations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 109–123. 10.1207/s15327582ijpr1402_3
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S.C., & Petty, R.E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D.S. (2002). Darwin's cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xygalatas, D. ( in press). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius. Religion, Brain & Behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161–197.
   Google Scholar